Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjaya Fernando

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 21:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjaya Fernando

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Lacks GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 14:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 14:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 09:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment looks quite notable for a Sri Lankan and has some sources maybe we are used to English language people having more sources but for alsokeone with an obscure country as this seem notable. --The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 (talk) 05:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources are provided that discuss the subject.--Rpclod (talk) 03:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The standards for notability on Wikipedia don't encompass "looks quite notable for a Sri Lankan," whatever that means; they do not in fact differ between someone born in Trincomalee, Tokyo or Terre Haute. As far as actual notability guidelines go, there is no evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 12:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.