Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Andrew Hutchins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Andrew Hutchins

Scott Andrew Hutchins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor politician never elected to office (see politician notability guideline), not the subject of significant coverage, potentially undeclared conflict of interest (User:Scottandrewhutchins has 30k edits, so I'd assume somewhat familiar with the guidelines...), no suitable redirect targets. czar 23:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. czar 23:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. czar 23:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails our notabilty guideline for politicians. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails GNG, and WP:POLITICIAN. Subject isn't notable. –Miles Edgeworth Talk 00:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Obviously fails WP:NPOL and can't find any other evidence of meeting WP:GNG. AusLondonder (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails notability guidelines for politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Being a non-winning candidate for political office does not get a person an article per WP:NPOL — and his notability claim as a writer is not referenced to media coverage about his writing, but to content where he was the bylined author of coverage about something else, which is not how you demonstrate a writer's notability either. Bearcat (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.