Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seales School of Music and Performing Arts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seales School of Music and Performing Arts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uncited orphan article, notability not demonstrated. Proposed deletion template was removed with the assertion that "lack of sources is no reason for deletion", but that did not address notability. I have searched Google News in vain for news coverage; I found one external source and added it, but it is scarcely more than a directory entry. – Fayenatic London 12:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is called a school but it is a commercial training institute, and not a place for secondary education or higher learning. By WP:NHS, secondary schools typically do not get deleted. There is no precedent for keeping Wikipedia articles about for-profit training businesses. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence found (Google, Highbeam, Questia) that this enterprise is notable. The Commonwealth Business & Arts entry that is one entry in a 6 page list of partnership enterprises across the world and not in itself evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As a for-profit entity, it must be held to the standards for notability of companies, and the lack of coverage and achievements means that this article fails. Ducknish (talk) 21:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.