Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secular Christmas stories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secular Christmas stories

Secular Christmas stories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic may be notable, but this unreferenced essay with OR issues has remained unchanged for over 10 years. I think it is time for WP:TNT. Note that I started a properly referenced Christmas in fiction where this could redirect to, if desired, but I don't think any merge is helpful (given it would merge unreferenced, possible OR). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The discussion seems to be leaning towards redirect or delete, but there is not consensus on a target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, snood1205 19:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Unreferenced, and appears to be WP:OR. Merging would be inappropriate due to this fact, and I wouldn't really support a Redirect at this point, as neither of the proposed Redirect targets actually mention the concept currently. Rorshacma (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Some people might be well-served by a list of secular Christmas stories, perhaps as a subcategory of Category:Christmas children's books, but this is not that list.
  • Delete There is no properly sourced content here, so there's nothing to merge. Neither proposed redirect target covers the topic at present, so redirecting there would not be appropriate. TompaDompa (talk) 23:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.