Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Parking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Social Parking

Neologism. "Social parking" gets 717 Google hits,[1] but most of these are about real life (car) parking. "Social Parking" plus "domain name" (what this is all about) gives only 5 Google hits[2], none of them indicating that this is a notable concept. No relevant hits in Google Scholar[3] or Google News either. Fram 11:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a domain industry-specific term. It is recognized among domain name monetization professionals. -Mayyada
Delete - NN and unverifiable. Spawn Man 12:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - never heard of it, no sources or references. Neologism I believe RyanLupin (^talk/_contribs) 13:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, spam. Corvus cornix 16:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. It sounds more like antisocial parking to me. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 20:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - From the author: There is Domain parking and there is also Social Software. The active and practical combination of the two is Social Parking. This term is recognized among domain name monetizer. It is industry-specific. -IDNexpert 02:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please provide reliable sources which discuss this term as a central point of the discussion in the source. Corvus cornix 22:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as references seem to exist: [4]. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This reference doesn't apply. A 'synthesis of commuter parking and community green space' is not what this topic is about. EdJohnston 05:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources comment on this term. What's provided here doesn't even satisfy the requirements of WP:NEO, to show that the word is generally accepted under this meaning and not a pure neologism. EdJohnston 05:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because the entry generally makes sense. The author has cited relevant references as well. Fastabbas —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 23:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentCited references are various Wikipeia articles. Not sure how that affects things. Closing admin, Fastabbas is a very new user. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:07, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless a reliable source can be produced. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.