Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surfers (talker) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surfers (talker)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Nothing notable in a search of the standard databases (EBSCOhost, PQ, Google Books, etc.) A redirect to talker would suffice, as it's one of the more prominent examples, but was challenged and in any event still has poor sourcing. czar 00:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. czar 00:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, still no significant sources seven years after the last AfD in which the article barely survived. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.