Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallgeese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 04:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tallgeese

Non-notable fancruft and/or original research. Doesn't have a connection to reality as required by WP:NOT. Contested prod. MER-C 02:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not OR/Fancruft. See Gundam Wing. Just H 03:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - definitely not either of the above. I don't watch anime and I've heard of this. --Haemo 03:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

None of you have provided comprehensive evidence that the subject has any real world significance whatsoever, as required by WP:NOT#IINFO. Not to mention the lack of sources. This is merely a plot summary. MER-C 05:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unverifiable WP:OR -- since when do animated science fiction outfits get encyclopaedic entries?? /Blaxthos 08:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. See RX-78 Gundam and Optimus Prime. Shrumster 20:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INN. MER-C 07:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I was merely answering Blaxthos' question, and wasn't using the articles I mentioned to support any view. Shrumster 21:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep well known and documented --TommyOliver 18:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How so? There's still no assertion of real world significance or notability in the article. And how about rebutting the points in the nomination? MER-C 07:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- Ned Scott 03:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Surprising that as soon as it comes to Gundam Wing, people shout keep all the way, while UC is no response.George Leung 04:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I hate Gundam Wing with a passion, I'm going to have to vote keep and rewrite. One of the primary antagonists of the series. Appears in several non-Gundam Wing games. Has several model kits, die cast figures and other commercial merchandise. Article needs to reflect these, but it's definitely notable. Shrumster 21:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It needs a bit of work, maybe it should go on a diet - the infoboxes looked awful when I visited the page just now. dreddnott 21:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, possible merge. I'm a Gundam fan, but I don't think we need a separate article on every single suit. Personally, I don't know of any real-world significance outside of possibly the model series, so I'd prefer to merge it into a list of AC Mobile Suits, but if said real-world notability can be added, then keep. Tiakalla 06:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's one of the main suits across multiple series. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.