Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted DiBiase and Cody Rhodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 16:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ted DiBiase and Cody Rhodes

Non-notable tag team. -- iMatthew _T.C. 01:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant to the existing articles on each member of the tag team. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 01:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per previous AfD on the same subject. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just because articles exist for the members doesn't mean all tag team article should be deleted. The articles on the team provide more in-depth info to prevent the main articles from being bloated. In this case, they've done nothing notable as a team, however. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Non-notable tag team. Tavix (talk) 02:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ultra speedy delete only because the very first line in the article is patently wrong. They formed at Night of Champions, and didn't even appear at Great American Bash. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.46.131 (talk) 06:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable tag team. WWF (oops excuse me WWE) has been putting teams together for years not all of them are notable and this one definitely isn't. No prejudice against recreation when they achieve something notable though. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They have won the Tag Titles. Darrenhusted (talk)

Can We just have it up for a month or two please? i will do any thing!! Dmanskater11 (talk) 15:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anything you say? Are you familiar with that episode of the Brady Bunch when Peter was Greg's slave for a week? Darrenhusted (talk) 13:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom 13 62^talk 15:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, just deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simply Priceless. Nikki311 19:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should have been CSD under recreation of deleted material. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PCE 1 August 2008

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.