Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temporary foreign worker program in Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. This discussion is redundant to another discussion already taking place at Talk:Temporary foreign worker program in Canada for merging. Because the nominator isn't proposing anything deletion-related, I will close this discussion and let the merge discussion continue. However, it's been more than a week since the merge was first proposed and they say silence is consensus, so it may be advisable to just WP:BOLDly perform the merger right now at this stage. -v/r- (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary foreign worker program in Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-neutral point of view spin off of the main article Temporary_residency. This essentially duplicates the information found in Temporary_residency however provides it in as a quasi news report ("it was claimed", "were said to be") and also offers CBC reports as research. I propose we merge the relevant information into Temporary_residency and (delete) redirect this article. Mrfrobinson (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to original article, Temporary residency. If there were something potentially either factual or a notable opinion, add it to that article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. "Merge and delete", Mrfrobinson's suggested outcome, violates the CC-BY-SA License and the GFDL, without carefully noting who is responsible for the merged data. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I will amend my suggestion to merge and redirect. Mrfrobinson (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.