Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricontinental Chile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. As an additional note, it's important to keep in mind that per WP:GNG, "Sources do not have to be available online or written in English." North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:55, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tricontinental Chile

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are two problems with this article. First, there are some notability concerns as I am unable to find many RS for this, although there maybe some Spanish language sources that I haven't looked into. The bigger problem though is that I feel that this just a trivia article (see WP:TRIVIA). I have not heard of this concept before, and while I think its neat, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. funplussmart (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If this goes, it'll be on WP:GNG concerns and the fact this concept isn't really talked about significantly in English. There's a bit in Spanish about Chile's tri-continental nature, especially in teaching schoolchildren geography. For instance, not the best source since probably not significant coverage but it definitely mentions the tricontinental nature of Chile: [1] However, this isn't trivia: WP:TRIVIA discusses lists of trivia in articles, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE doesn't talk about geographical articles like this. SportingFlyer talk 05:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I realize that now. I still think there are some significant notability concerns though. And I still don't think Chile's transcontinental nature needs a Wikipedia article. funplussmart (talk) 12:01, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Please, consider our own language limitations before submitting an article for deletion. The concept is a legitimate scientific inquiry (see here). The Spanish language article is, as expected, better sourced (see here). The fact that it is a little-known topic outside of Chile does not warrant landing in AfD. Caballero/Historiador^⎌ 20:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Someone please close this AfD as withdrawn. I am now convinced this article should be kept. I need to take a break from posting bad AfDs. funplussmart (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.