Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Smackdown vs. Raw 2009

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Smackdown vs. Raw 2009 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No such game has been announced. Article is full of unsourced info and speculation. IF such a game gets announced and enough infomation is avaiable, it can get a article in the future. TJ Spyke 02:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —TJ Spyke 02:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - violation of WP:CRYSTAL SexySeaBass 02:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTAL ball. The game has not been officially announced, no reliable sources cited. --Jtalledo (talk) 03:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete now if this game was release by EA, we could be sure of a sequal, but not in this case... Fosnez (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per reasons stated above. Rockhound (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:Crystal. Nikki311 00:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per what Nikki311 said, Wikipedia is NOT a crystal ball. NimiTize 02:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this is just pure speculation and violates WP:CRYSTAL. This is an article created blindly with little-to-no real sources of information.--EclipseSSD (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. John Hayes^talk 14:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per violation of WP:CRYSTAL. In a couple months, when more information comes out legitimately, *then* create the page. DJBullfish 22:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.