Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Barber II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mkativerata (talk) 11:44, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

William Barber II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have some influence / profile, but WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 08:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:17, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment to my mind this nom should stand or fall according to his significance within National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. I note that this has no "People" category for its important officers. I do not know enough of the subject to vote. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - he appears to be high up in NAACP. Bearian (talk) 23:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - significant coverage in multiple RS = meets notability requirements. LadyofShalott 17:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Nomination withdrawn after imorvements and comments at AfD. Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.