Wikipedia:Editor review/LAAFan 3

LAAFan

LAAFan (talk · contribs) I have just made one 4000th edit, and I would like an editor review to see how I'm doing. LAA Fan^sign _review 19:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Ahh, since you were so kind to ER me, it seems only fair that I return the favour :-) Regarding those two conflicts you mention...... ;-) As with most people (myself included), you seemed to miss a few edit summaries in the first few weeks of editing, but you've got it up to 100% now, which is good. Looking at your most commonly edited articles, I'm guessing there's a baseball theme to your interests ! I'd try and branch out a bit more into other areas (in terms of editing articles), and possibly try to cut down on the number of small repeated edits you make one after another - I've seen some admins pick this up as insufficient use of the 'preview' button, but I'm probably just as guilty in some cases ! However, the GA articles seem very good, and you seem to do accurate work in the admin area - page protection, AIV, removal of vandalism etc., and seem to be regarded well by other editors (even those you've adopted). To be honest, I can't really find anything critical to say - which could be bad as it either means you're perfect, or my review isn't thorough enough :-) I look forward to seeing your RfA ! :-) CultureDrone (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are some of your thoughts on this warning. You warned the user following this edit by yourself. This was the edit made by the user who you warned, which was following a reverting of this edit by User:45Factoid44. Though at the time of this warning the user did not have a well-established identity on Wikipedia, he did provide a detailed edit summary corresponding with a section on the articles's talk page. Thanks. Xenocide^Talk^|^{Contributions} 00:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
I'm most pleased with my article contributions, mainly Major League Baseball and Cy Young, two articles I improved to GAs.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I was in two conflicts about 5 months ago when I was brand new to Wikipedia. I've learned since then, so I'd like to not bring those two conflicts up.