Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Milk thistle flowerhead.jpg
Milk Thistle Flowerhead
Very clear image with excellent sharpness and good subject isolation without serious DOF issues.
- Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 02:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support this is a very nice image, as you said clear, great subject isolation and no DOF issues. Highly encyclopedic also. Arjun 03:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Minor support. Small focus issues with the green petals in the back and the purple fuzz toward the back. Also it's kind of "just another flower picture" --frothT C 03:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support good detail. Noclip 05:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Support per above Krowe 06:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Support per Froth. Joe 09:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me. Technically good and very encyclopedic. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 20:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Support It is not the most interesting flower but it is definitely a great photo non the less. Why1991 00:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - I love your photos, Fir, but I'm just not crazy about this one. I can't really comment on the technical aspects, but I do think they're fine. However, like froth said, it's just another picture of a flower (albeit a very pretty one.) At this point, it'd take a FPC of a jungle flower to impress me with flora. --Iriseyes 00:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. The lighting's a little harsh, but overall it does a good job of displaying the flower. --Tewy 01:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support This is a nice picture. Nice detail on the thorns. --Midnight Rider 22:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Another FP material from Pete's FP producing factory. - Darwinek 00:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Almost perfect quality (I only wish for a bit more DOF). NauticaShades 14:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral. Exactly what I look for in a photo of a flower like this... but it doesn't "wow" me. While it's probably technically perfect, I don't find it that compelling. Perhaps a different composition or something? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 20:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. As per above. Focus is good and proves my point that every square inch of a FP need NOT be in perfect focus, but it's just not special enough for me. Sorry. --Mactographer 22:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per above, composition is not appealing. Alvesgaspar 08:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. However, my preference is for cropping the empty space on the right and squaring it a bit (which will also improve the thumbnail detail assuming the same image width on the page). Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 16:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Milk thistle flowerhead.jpg Raven4x4x 06:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchIndian Premier LeagueWikipedia:Featured picturesPornhubUEFA Champions League2024 Indian Premier LeagueFallout (American TV series)Jontay PorterXXXTentacionAmar Singh ChamkilaFallout (series)Cloud seedingReal Madrid CFCleopatraRama NavamiRichard GaddDeaths in 2024Civil War (film)Shōgun (2024 miniseries)2024 Indian general electionJennifer PanO. J. SimpsonElla PurnellBaby ReindeerCaitlin ClarkLaverne CoxXXX (film series)Facebook2023–24 UEFA Champions LeagueYouTubeCandidates Tournament 2024InstagramList of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finalsJude BellinghamMichael Porter Jr.Andriy LuninCarlo AncelottiBade Miyan Chote Miyan (2024 film)