Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 17

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Outrageous-Scan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nick2341 (notify | contribs).

• Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:FUC, criteria #8. - Fastily (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corrie_ten_Boom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Idontknow610 (notify | contribs).

• copyright holder not specified, fails WP:NFCC10 Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AungSan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dr._Blofeld (notify | contribs).

• cropped from image that has been deleted for lacking source information, doesn't seem likely to be PD (70 years after death of photographer) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:VincentCorrao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• no indication at source that this is a "FBI surveillance photo" Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sciascia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• no indication at source that this is an "FBI surveillance photo" Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErnstToller.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• no date on image, subject died 1939, a good chance this is non-free Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MadMike.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• fails WP:NFCC10 - copyright holder not identified, just sourced to random personal website Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JeanSchramme.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• copyright holder not identified, sourced to website that is clearly not the copyright holder Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HajiMastan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• copyright holder not identified; also seems from the image page that a mugshot exists, which is a better alternative (fewer fair use issues) and should be used instead Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HymieWeissdead.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• not necessary to see dead body to understand article, fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. - Fastily (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:VincenztDruccidead.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• again, not necessary to see body to understand article Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the image name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MarioCondello.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• no real source. who is the copyright holder? Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted, violation of NFCC2 (regardless of age) – Quadell ^(talk) 15:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErnestoFonsecaCarrillo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson_Noel (notify | contribs).

• non-free image taken by news agency, fails WP:NFCC2 - respect for commercial opportunities. they'd love to license this to us for a fee. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, this is so old that it doesn't have the commercial opportunities envisaged by NFCC2. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per above. - Mafia Expert (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Streets of Buckhead2.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DAP388 (notify | contribs).

• GFDL license claimed but source http://www.atlantaskyriseblog.com/?p=56 indicates Copyright © 2008 atlantaSKYrise, LLC. All rights reserved. Whpq (talk) 02:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but images like this should be tagged as {{subst:npd}} rather than listed here. Stifle (talk) 09:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC #1. The fair use image can be replaced with a free eqivalent. It is Wikipedia policy to respect the copyright law of all nations whether thay are party to any copyright treaty with the United States or not -Nv8200p talk 01:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster with mistake in The.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adek336 (notify | contribs).

• Invalid fair use. Image is replaceable. Copyright holder is unknown, article has nothing to do with the property being referenced, it is about a common typo. I'm pretty sure typos could expressed in (free) text. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Just a note, but Iran has no entry on Commons' Freedom of Panorama page. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  That would only cover permanently placed items, this is a temporary paid ad. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't see how this image infringes on anyone's rights. The picture is of a generic ad, with a person standing (publicly) in front of it. No monetary loss can possibly exist for any possible owner of this image, as it does not sell anything. Furthermore the image IS educational, has everything to do with the article being referenced - its about typos, and the image is one of a public space, with a typo in a billboard. It's completely relevant. As it exists on the billboard, it illustrates the commonality of the typo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.104.19 (talk) 04:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The fair use copyright tag on this image CLEARLY states "...or of the poster itself..." as being valid. The image shows the commonality of the mispelling. I believe it should stay. Mckeznak (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per Wikipedia:Non-free content, particularly "no free equivalent", the usage of this image falls outside of Wikipedia policy. The usage of "teh" can be illustrated quite easily with free content. One could create it by running an IRC session and typing a phrase deliberately and then taking a screen grab. It's quite clear that the image is replaceable as identified by the nominator. -- Whpq (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - As noted in U.S. Copyright Office Circular 38a, Iran is not a party to any copyright treaty with the United States. Assuming the poster is "Iranian" as described in its summary, it is public domain under the applicable U.S. law, and is therefore not Wikipedia:Non-free content. TJRC (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the poster is not flat, therefore constitutes a 3-d object.Harrypotter (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  In that case, we're violating the copyright of the person who owns the poster and of the person who took the picture. Good point. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 17:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as replaceable fair use. Stifle (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is not fair use, replaceable or otherwise, because it is not copyrighted; see above. TJRC (talk) 17:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:With epifano and robert.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andrew Parodi (notify | contribs).

• Not used in an article, nor likely to be used in an article. Is a personal photo used on a user page: WP:NOTMYSPACE Aboutmovies (talk) 07:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by WereSpielChequers (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PapalCross.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dulcimerist (notify | contribs).

• Redundant to commons:File:PopesCross.svg, commons:File:Papal.png, and commons:File:Tricross.svg. Too low resolution to ever be used in any article, considering how easy it is to create a similar image of better quality. Plrk (talk) 08:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted it per author's request on User talk:Plrk WereSpielChequers 11:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MrGodsmark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by O3scotto (notify | contribs).

• Image that serves no real purpose apart from being used in an article with a speedy deletion tag currently placed upon it. Uksam88 (talk) 12:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otis Redding.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Registered user 92 (notify | contribs).

• Stock photo. Cannot be fair use. ViperSnake151 13:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Bus route 83.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AimalJan (notify | contribs).

• Very low quality, I don't feel this image has a place here. Jenuk1985 | Talk 16:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• LQ Delete --Narson ~ Talk • 17:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Buses route 297.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AimalJan (notify | contribs).

• Very low quality, I don't feel this image has a place here Jenuk1985 | Talk 16:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• LQ Delete --Narson ~ Talk • 17:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Bus route 79.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AimalJan (notify | contribs).

• Very low quality, I don't feel this image has a place here Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• LQ Delete --Narson ~ Talk • 17:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Bus route 224.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AimalJan (notify | contribs).

• Very low quality, I don't feel this image has a place here Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• LQ Delete --Narson ~ Talk • 17:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.