Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 June 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:NickPatsaourasBustatPatsaourasTransitPlaza.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Saltysailor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is no FOP for 3D works in the USA; derivative of non-free content FASTILY 00:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Hooper Councill statue.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dtg84 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is no FOP for 3D works in the USA; derivative of non-free content FASTILY 00:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete all. Msact is welcome to upload them to Commons in the future. Deryck C. 13:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weeping European Beech Tree at McKillop Library, Salve Regina University, Newport, RI - August 29, 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Msact (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 03:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This file was already listed at FFD and kept, for the record. Same for the other files in this batch, and the uploader doesn't seem to have been notified.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure what "Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use" means. I uploaded these images for use on various Wikipedia pages about tree species and about the cities/towns or historic places where the trees are located. Is the problem that there's a person in the photos along with the trees? I do that to better show the size of the tree, but I can use photos without people in them if that's an issue. Also, at the time that I uploaded these images, I think I hadn't started uploading to Wikimedia Commons yet - so if the problem is that I should have uploaded them to Commons instead, I can do that. I'm not so concerned about these being taken down; I'm more concerned about doing things correctly in the future. Thanks. --Msact (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  @Msact: Generally, if one makes images of a tree one wants to only have a tree in the image, I guess. Hence why they are being called "personal images". And yes, if they are free images they should be uploaded to Commons rather than here, although I know this isn't an universally held opinion.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thank you for the information - I appreciate it. --Msact (talk) 00:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sariaya Quezon Montage.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GEOGIA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image is a collage (which is not a good idea to begin with), but there is no sourcing provided identifying the component elements. The upload comments include the claim "This is for educational purposes only and no copyright infrigement (sic)" but that cannot be ascertained without the sources for the collage. Many of the free licenses require attribution which is missing here. Whpq (talk) 04:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. It has been demonstrated that this fair use image is not easily replaceable. Deryck C. 21:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Technetium.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Double sharp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#1, could be replaced by a free image FASTILY 06:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to try, but I doubt you will find success. Technetium is not sold to the general public (although it is not that bad a radiation hazard, because it has a very long half-life and decays to clean stability, so make of that what you will given that thorium and uranium are). Double sharp (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did search for US government websites and Creative Commons websites and didn't find any photo of the element itself. As a rare radioactive element free images will be very hard to come by if any exist.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - After poking around and reading about this element, it does appear that access to it for a photograph would be difficult. An example from WP:NON-FREE was helpful in making this decision. "In considering the ability to take a free photograph, it is expected that the photographer respect all local property and privacy laws and restrictions. For example, we would not expect a free photograph of a structure on inaccessible private property that is not visible from public locations." I think that this controlled access radioactive element is a similar case to an inaccessible structure. It is not reasonable to expect that a free equivalent could be made. -- Whpq (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schertzmap.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Derekmarc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be a crop of a (non-free) map, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 06:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Antonioschertz.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Derekmarc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be a crop of a non-free map (see watermark in bottom left corner), likely copyvio FASTILY 06:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newschertzmap.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Derekmarc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be a crop of a (non-free) map, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 06:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Payanam 1976 film .jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sangavitamilmani (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is actually a picture of the 2011 film. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delores redd2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vinci57 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, likely no encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 11:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dem2 vehicle.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dragos muresan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, very low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 11:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demaina.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Solitary Copt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 11:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Denvertemps.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Trodaikid1983 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused jpg graph. Kelly ^hi! 11:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anderson House commemorative plaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Slowmover (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative of non-free content (text on plaque) FASTILY 11:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: FUR → PD-1923 czar 19:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerry of the Islands by Jack London.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lamro (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The book this is a cover of was published in 1917, and the source does not indicate it's a newer cover, so {{PD-1923}} likely applies here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus, feel free to clean this up with whatever details you found. I saw several editions of the book in WorldCat so you'd just want to make sure that the cover is coming from the 1917 edition. This is a change you can just make boldly czar 20:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as uncontested. Uploader's user talk doesn't inspire an WP:AGF keep argument either. Deryck C. 21:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sariaya Official Seal.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GEOGIA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is supposed to be the official seal of Sariaya so the claim that the uploader is the copyright holder is problematic. Aws one would expect to the copyright for an official government seal to rest with the government. We may consider conversion to a non-free rationale but there is no source given for where this cam from. The municipality's official web site http://sariaya.gov.ph/ uses a very small version of the seal that has a white background and not the gold textured background seen in the uploaded image so it is unclear if this is indeed the official seal with the appropriate colour schemes. Whpq (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariah Carey - Love Takes Time US cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smarty9108 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Thank You for you addition George, but I believe for the benefit of the article, a CD single needs to be added, the image was obviously taken by an eBay user and was not a good picture, also I personally wish more Cassette singles for LTT were available in better resolution, but apparently not. troublednbored (talk) 23:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.