Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 19

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:D&DUnicorns.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Polisher of Cobwebs (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I am not convinced that the fair use argument for this image is valid. The topic of a "unicorn" has plenty of images— the argument that the only valid image of this particular rendition of an unicorn, the one from the Monster Manual, is this particular rendition, appears circular. The image is protected by copyright, and a fair use argument for its use on the English Wikipedia must be watertight... to argue it is the only image that could be used because it is the only image of a unicorn is, of course, groundless. To me, this looks like something we cannot host. But I am interested in having others' input on this. KDS4444^Talk 10:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, the article is Unicorn (Dungeons & Dragons); does that topic have copyrighted character designs or can they be recreated as free images without running into derivative works?Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Can you clarify for me what constitutes "copyrighted character design"? If by that you mean, is the "character" a creation unique to and therefore copyrightable by TSR Games in the way that Mickey Mouse and Darth Vader are property of Disney, my own answer is "I don't think so." TSR does have several monster character concepts which are unique to it, but that list won't include any of the "classical" monster like pixies, or ogres though I believe would include things like the otyugh et al. KDS4444^Talk 14:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The image is replaceable by one that is freely licensed. The D&D unicorn is based on the creature of myth, and its external appearance is not different from the usual depictions of mythical unicorns. -- Whpq (talk) 22:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• I concur with Whpq. If someone wants to find a free equivalent from commons, it can be changed out without further discussion. Jclemens (talk) 04:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Disha Patani at loafer movie success meet.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jashafi24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This picture is most probably copyrighted. Biwom (talk) 10:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, it is. Tagged it for F9; I guess the uploader confused "publicly available" with "public domain".Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tito.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Puepue11 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is shadowing a Commons file, but it's not at all clear what the photo is about and the uploader's edit history is not insightful. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turovsky.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Torban (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There are two files here, an older one which I can't identify at all and a second one which exists at File:Turovsky2.jpg. This file is unused and shadows a Commons file so should probably be deleted unless someone can identify the topic. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Argentine Rugby Union Ricky81682 (talk) 06:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uar rugby logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fma12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free logo being used in Argentine Rugby Union, Argentine national rugby union team, Argentina Jaguars, Argentina national under-20 rugby union team and Argentina national rugby union team (sevens). The usage in teams article does not seem to comply with WP:NFCC per number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. I suggest removing the badge from all the articles with the exception of "Argentine Rugby Union". - Fma12 (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in Argentine Basketball Federation, remove all other instances. — ξ^xplicit 06:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caab sunlogo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fma12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free logo being used in Argentina national basketball team, Argentine Basketball Federation and Argentina women's national basketball team. The usage in teams article does not seem to comply with WP:NFCC per number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. I suggest removing the badge from all the articles with the exception of "Argentine Basketball Federation". Fma12 (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in Argentine Hockey Confederation, remove all other instances. — ξ^xplicit 06:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cah logo new.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fma12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free logo being used in Argentina men's national field hockey team, Argentina women's national field hockey team and Argentine Hockey Confederation. The usage in teams article does not seem to comply with WP:NFCC per number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. I suggest removing the badge from all the articles with the exception of "Argentine Hockey Confederation" Fma12 (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monstermanualcentaur.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Polisher of Cobwebs (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is being used under a fair use claim. I am not convinced such a claim is valid. The "centaur" as a creature is not a character concept owned by TSR games, and so this artist's rendition of one, which is in close concert with the original Ancient Greek imagery, does not qualify as a fair use of the image. If you want a picture of a centaur, we have plenty of those— there is no compelling reason I can see why this particular image must be used, and therefore no viable claim for fair use of it. KDS4444^Talk 15:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. As far as I'm concerned, there is no need for a fair use claim of this image, so the centaur depicted is not the same than TSR Games' one. Fma12 (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The D&D centaur is based on the centaur of mythology, and has the same external appearance so any free image of a centaur should suffice. No need for a non-free one. -- Whpq (talk) 22:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree with Whpq. Jclemens (talk) 02:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Table.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mdd4696 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

See Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 7#Template:Protected generic image name. Stefan2 (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Use more precise file name.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kimsey0 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is now shadowing a redirect on Commons which points to an image with identical content. The local copy is now unnecessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: All of the files seem to have been deleted, so there is no point in keeping this open any longer. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Brett.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:PICTURE.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Webb.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Picture.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

As per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 7#Template:Protected generic image name, these should be deleted and upload protected as well.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: does this need to be discussed again? Could these placeholders not be deleted under the consensus of the previous discussion you linked? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: I've seen (offwiki) some events where two very similar things ended up being treated differently at the end due to some important difference or another. I don't think this is the case here, though, so probably yes.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the local versions of these files, and create-protected each. It does not seem to be possible to upload-protect a non-existent image; perhaps this is a bug? For example, see the 18:02 entry in this log, which did not seem to have any effect on the file. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: I just tried to upload a file to and I receive "Upload error This image name or media file name is protected." so I guess that creation protection does the same thing.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The way the interface is designed (with upload and create protection separately listed) leads you to believe you can set them differently. But perhaps it's not needed. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colivadino usinas.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sherlock4000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low-quality crop. c:File:Usinas collivadino.jpg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The version of "Usinas" uploaded to Commons is better. - Fma12 (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, delete the local version.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.