Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 October 25

< October 24	October 26 >

October 25

File:AUS Alphanumeric Route F1.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:16, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AUS Alphanumeric Route F2.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:AUS Alphanumeric Route F4.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:AUS Alphanumeric Route F5.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:AUS Alphanumeric Route F7.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:AUS Alphanumeric Route F8.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

recreated as proper SVGs with corrected names File:New South Wales freeway F1.svg File:New South Wales freeway F2.svg File:New South Wales freeway F3.svg File:New South Wales freeway F4.svg File:New South Wales freeway F5.svg File:New South Wales freeway F6.svg File:New South Wales freeway F7.svg File:New South Wales freeway F8.svgafter request at WP:HWY/RM old images can now be deleted as redundant and misnamed KylieTastic (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, redundant to the actual SVG files. Salavat (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georges.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image and likely copyright violation. The original image is probably fine, but the actual source would be difficult to track down after 15 years. Then it was overwritten by a copyright violation - the uploader didn't update the description, but the upload description includes a copyright notice and a link to the source (archived version) which shows no indication of meeting our licensing needs. I find no evidence that the original image was ever used. I recommend deleting both images, but would not argue with a decision to only delete the most recent. ★ Bigr Tex 21:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value (and questionable licensing for the current image). Salavat (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the current image and Keep the original image. The current image is a clear copyright violation. The upload comment even states it is a copyrighted work. The Hurricane Georges timeline images is properly licensed, and should be transferred to Commons as it could be used for illustrating the hurricane's image and position over time if somebody were to want to do that. It is in scope for Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 01:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the current image and Keep the original image. as Whpq. KylieTastic (talk) 14:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.