Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Littlemixfan!

Littlemixfan! (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

27 April 2024

– A user has requested CheckUser, but more information is required before deciding whether to check.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Reneradelsilver (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Reneradelsilver restored an article from redirect using the same wording as Littlemixfan! seven years ago.[1][2] Other than that, the behavior isn't as convincing as it should be. Checkuser requested to make certain. Binksternet (talk) 19:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Girth Summit, that's all I got. This user is not acting like the puppet master or socks. Binksternet (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Additional information needed: Binksternet, is there any more evidence than that they reinstated a song article? I mean, it's not unlikely that there are two people in the world who think that the same song is notable, and I'm not going to run a check on someone based on that alone. (I'll add that we don't have any recent CU data for this case (last confirmed sock was blocked in 2018), so even scouring the CU logs for data is going to be of limited use.) Girth Summit _(blether) 12:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]