Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/207.81.56.49

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

207.81.56.49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

207.6.12.137 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Mumun 無文 00:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

At the Regina neighbourhoods article the disruptive anonymous IP User:207.81.56.49 from Victoria, B.C., used sockpuppetry in order to feign support for the mis-representative inappropriate edits of User:207.6.12.137, another disruptive anon. IP from Victoria, B.C. here re the diffs: this, this, and this. Here are the actual edits here, please note the edit summary. The anon. IP has re-engaged in edit-warring as well at the same article. Mumun 無文 00:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

This highly disruptive anon. IP is suspected of being User:Mayor Quimby, another user who also engaged in sockpuppetry, edit-warring, repeated vandalism, and making legal threats against several of those who tried to thwart Quimby's actions. The main evidence for this is the highly similar pattern of editing and personal attacks engaged in by User:Mayor Quimby, User:207.81.56.49, User:207.6.12.137, I wrote up my concerns about the behaviours engaged in by this individual here. Quimby was indef. blocked, and User:207.81.56.49 was briefly blocked for evading the indef. block of Quimby. All of this was sparked by the user's single purpose of inserting misrepresentative, misleading and inappropriate statistics in Regina and Regina neighbourhoods. Mumun 無文 00:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock puppet and Mumun 無文 has shown a single minded purpose in insuring that the statistics are viewed as misrepresentative, misleading and inappropriate. However, these statistics are quite the opposite. I recommend a view of them at Talk: Regina Neighbourhoods, in the compromise section. I challenge those that review this, and Mumun 無文, to supply a reasonable and logical reason for this belief .--207.6.12.137 04:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

• Both IPs are clearly the same person. 207.6.12.137 gets a 72 hour block for evading the indef block on User:Mayor Quimby; if there are ongoing problems at REgina, Saskatchewan semi-protection is probably the best option. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]