Suggest the feedback button at the end of articles should be labelled "Feedback" (followed by any comments like "Help improve this page" etc. if necessary. I also suggest that the feedback button be stuck at the top with similar buttons like "article", "edit" etc. This would clarify the situation and also be consistent.--CPES (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There's quite a high amount of vandalism on the article feedback pages. Most of these are from anonymous editors who have little or no other contributions. Most of them never seem to get admonished or warned on their talk pages. Is there anything we could be doing to reduce the apathetic attitude towards this? Perhaps linking article feedback to user contributions instead of just logging it would be a good help? Alternatively, we could make contributions designated "inappropriate" visible to everyone through a specific url; instead of just monitors. I hope to read any suggestions that can be made on this pressing issue. --Thebirdlover (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Editor Assistance FAQ links here but there is just this page about retired software a link to what appears to be an unfinished experimental project for adding feedback mechanism to regular articles. So how does an editor looking to improve their work request feedback? Thank you. Beakermeep(talk) 03:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RFF redirects to this page, and I even added the redirect2 tag to it (as WP:FEED also redirected here), but I'm certain that people going to this shortcut are more likely to look for Wikipedia:Rules for Fools. Should we discuss this? --TL22 (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]