Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Malcolmxl5

User:Malcolmxl5   run at Sat Aug 23 14:36:49 2008 GMT   Category:              8   Image talk:            2   Image:                 5   Mainspace              10961   Portal:                3   Talk:                  2452   Template:              18   User talk:             437   User:                  620   Wikipedia talk:        224   Wikipedia:             1449   avg edits per page     2.28   earliest               23:18, 9 April 2007   number of unique pages 7087   total                  16179   2007/4  77   2007/5  206   2007/6  611   2007/7  867   2007/8  807   2007/9  1127   2007/10 1068   2007/11 1101   2007/12 2751   2008/1  1180   2008/2  534   2008/3  1184   2008/4  737   2008/5  1272   2008/6  776   2008/7  1225   2008/8  656   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red   denotes edits without an edit summary)                  Mainspace   147 [2]Lomana LuaLua   92  [3]Nigel Reo-Coker   84  [4]Celtic F.C. season 2000-01   82  [5]Freddy Eastwood   79  [6]Scott Carson   76  [7]Carlton Cole   76  [8]Teddy Sheringham   74  [9]Jermain Defoe   70  [10]Billy Bonds   63  [11]Stephen Bywater   60  [12]First Civil Service Commissioner   55  [13]Hayden Mullins   54  [14]Office for National Statistics   54  [15]Bobby Zamora   51  [16]Marlon Harewood                            Talk:   23 [17]Freddy Eastwood   17 [18]Carlos T�vez   11 [19]Yossi Benayoun   8  [20]William Lawrence Balls   8  [21]Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs   7  [22]Scott Parker (footballer)   7  [23]Arthur James Turner   6  [24]Julian Waterfall Pollack   6  [25]Trenton, Ontario   5  [26]Rayavaram (Krishna district)   5  [27]Billy Bonds   5  [28]Edward Vick   5  [29]Tilbury   4  [30]George Kay   4  [31]Alan Curbishley           Image:   4 [32]Keynsham Town.JPG                 Portal:   2 [33]Wales/New article announcements             Template:   3 [34]Mansfield Town F.C. squad   2 [35]Wrexham F.C. squad                         User:   248 [36]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox   174 [37]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult   70  [38]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox2   61  [39]Malcolmxl5   12  [40]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive5   11  [41]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive4   9   [42]Woody/Sandbox   4   [43]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive2   4   [44]Fabrictramp   3   [45]Gogo Dodo   2   [46]Justmeherenow/Obama family of Kenya/Sandbox   2   [47]West Ham Fan   2   [48]MediaStudies110           User talk:   53 [49]Malcolmxl5   10 [50]Gogo Dodo   8  [51]Muffin Man 23   7  [52]69.157.65.118   6  [53]Poeloq   6  [54]Malcolmxl5/Archive 1   6  [55]Blotto adrift   5  [56]Joseffudge   5  [57]Redrocket   5  [58]Mr Hall of England   4  [59]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox   4  [60]Kurt Shaped Box   4  [61]Meco   4  [62]207.188.72.46   4  [63]86.160.240.191                         Wikipedia:   150 [64]WikiProject Football   30  [65]WikiProject Football/New articles   14  [66]WikiProject Football/Booklist   12  [67]Articles for deletion/Frankie Loscavio   11  [68]Articles for deletion/Lewis Stanson   9   [69]WikiProject Football/Links   9   [70]Articles for deletion/Tymm Hoffman   9   [71]Articles for deletion/Nicolai Lomov   9   [72]Pages needing translation into English   8   [73]Administrator intervention against vandalism   7   [74]Articles for deletion/GlavUpDK   7   [75]Articles for deletion/Systemshock   7   [76]Articles for deletion/Celtic F.C. season 2000-01   6   [77]Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 15   6   [78]Articles for deletion/John FitzGerald                 Wikipedia talk:   165 [79]WikiProject Football   6   [80]New pages patrol/patrolled pages   5   [81]WikiProject Non-league football   3   [82]WikiProject Automobiles/Archive 10   3   [83]WikiProject Astronomy   3   [84]Manual of Style (flags)   2   [85]WikiProject Mathematics   2   [86]Noticeboard for India-related topics   2   [87]WikiProject Australia   2   [88]WikiProject Topical outlines   2   [89]Archived delete discussions   If there were any problems, please [90]email Interiot or post at   [91]User talk:Interiot.

• The edit count was retrieved from this link at 14:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC).

1. • Surely an admin candidate who !votes Delete in AfDs for obviously non-encyclopedic articles should be a reason to support, not oppose? Or am I missing something? All those articles were obvious deletes apart from the two that ended up merge/no consensus. If we opposed everyone who !voted Delete on an AfD that was eventually kept, we'd have no admins at all. Also, some of those AfDs are over a year old.... bizarre. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

1. • From what I know, Le Grand Roi opposes the candidate if they have opposing viewpoints on any RfAs - CL — 19:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • This is one of the the most idiotic and personal opposes I've seen. Yanksox (talk) 20:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • Immature responses are not how to convince people to support. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • I am opposing because those were encyclopedic articles that were unjustifiably deleted. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • This is a personal vendetta against the deleting admin, not the candidate at large. Furthermore, I'm sick of people that act almost like mere pond scum and just pounce on this like a soapbox. I remember one character in particular that did it to my RfA and others and was blocked sometime after for being a sockmaster. I'm not saying anything in particular, but just putting it out there. Yanksox (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • What?! I am opposing because I disagree with the candidate's interpretation of inclusion criteria and how they would likely close AfDs. Those discussions I cite above were closed by several different admins. Which one do I allegedly have a vendetta against? --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • This is not a vendetta against the deleting admin, but against all admins who have ever deleted anything. --T-rex 21:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   • If that were so, then I would not have would have to oppose those who closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adams equation, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alhaji sani labaran, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagot Beast, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butt harp, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canyon of the Vaginas, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delboo, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorian's identity, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy-cook rice (joke), etc. I don't oppose people because they argue to delete as I myself have argued and nominated to delete more articles than I good number of editors I have seen have argued to keep. I oppose based on what and why editors argued to delete. Someone can actually be a deletionist of sorts and every thing they argued to delete I might not disagree with. Look through those whom I have supported and I am sure they have argued to delete here and there. It has nothing to do with simply arguing to delete, again, it is what I believe to be misinterpretations of inclusion criteria or incorrect arguments. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   Le Grand Roi, I understand your opinion, but can you at least provide diffs from, well, 2008 next time? Wizardman 21:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   I shall keep that in mind. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

   Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles has a right to oppose. He opposed my RFA, but I learned a lot because of his oppose !vote. It is important for editors to understand that deleting some articles can undo years of work of other editors. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)