User talk:Nokia 1280
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hi Nokia 1280! I noticed your contributions to Lê dynasty and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! — MarkH21talk 01:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for assuming that English is not your first language, but a lot of your additions to Lê dynasty fall short of the English grammatical and encylopedic style standards required on Wikipedia. As an example, don't assert in WP:WIKIVOICE that a historical figure was cruel
or that some event was ironic
. Your content additions are greatly appreciated, but I would suggest first proposing texts on the talk page or in a sandbox first before making massive changes to existing articles. I'd be very happy to work with you on these portions of text.
Also, please note that some of your additions rely heavily on primary historical sources, which should only be cited with care. — MarkH21talk 01:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Lê dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MarkH21talk 01:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nokia_1280 reported by User:MarkH21 (Result: ). Thank you. — MarkH21talk 02:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]