1990 Polish presidential election

Presidential elections were held in Poland on 25 November 1990, with a second round on 9 December.[1] They were the first direct presidential elections in the history of Poland, and the first free presidential elections since the May Coup of 1926. Before World War II, presidents were elected by the Sejm. From 1952 to 1989—the bulk of the Communist era—the presidency did not exist as a separate institution, and most of its functions were fulfilled by the State Council of Poland, whose chairman was considered the equivalent of a president.

1990 Polish presidential election

← 198925 November 1990 (first round)
9 December 1990 (second round)
1995 →
Turnout60.63% (first round)
53.40% (second round)
 
Wybory 1989 13 (cropped v2).png
Stanisław Tymiński (Święte Psy, 1990) (cropped).jpg
NomineeLech WałęsaStanisław Tymiński
PartyKO "S" (PC)Independent
Popular vote10,622,6963,683,098
Percentage74.25%25.75%


President before election

Wojciech Jaruzelski
PZPR

Elected President

Lech Wałęsa
KO "S"

There were six candidates who successfully managed to register - Solidarity chairman Lech Wałęsa, Canadian entrepreneur Stanisław Tymiński, Prime Minister Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Members of the Sejm Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz and Roman Bartoszcze, and anti-communist oppositionist Leszek Moczulski. Despite for a long time coming first in opinion polls, Tadeusz Mazowiecki's campaign failed to convince voters to his side, and he did not enter the runoff, coming third in the first round. Stanisław Tymiński came second in a large upset unforseen by every political force in the country, and, being seen by other candidates as a liar and oppurtunist, managed to unite both the postcommunist and Solidarity establishments against him. In the second round, Wałęsa won almost 75% of voters, being the largest landslide electoral victory in Polish political history.[2][3]

Background

Fall of Communism

Wojciech Jaruzelski (left) and Czesław Kiszczak (right)

Following the Polish Round Table Agreement, universal parliamentary elections were held in Poland. They were the first free elections since 1928, and began the era of democratic and free market[a] reforms in Poland, as the power of the Polish United Workers' Party (PZPR) began quickly disintegrating - early next year, the party would dissolve, succeeded by the Social Democracy of the Republic of Poland (SdRP), where most of the communist party's wealth was controversially transferred, and the short-lived Polish Social Democratic Union.[4]

The last attempts at salvaging power by the PZPR was the appointment of Czesław Kiszczak as Prime Minister, who was first assigned the mission of forming a new government with 237 votes (and 173 against), but later, after a defection from ZSL and SD, his proposed government failed to receive the Sejm's confidence[5]. Instead, Solidarity compromised with the communists in a historic compromise, wherein PZPR Chairman Wojciech Jaruzelski would be elected to the newly-created position of President, while a Solidarity-aligned candidate - Tadeusz Mazowiecki - would become Prime Minister.[2]

Split within "Solidarity"

Frasyniuk with Mazowiecki, 1991

The concept of the execution of such compromise was controversial within Solidarity. Liberal and left-leaning[6] members like Bronisław Geremek, Jacek Kuroń, Władysław Frasyniuk or Adam Michnik wanted to create a grand coalition with reformist wing of PZPR. However, the right-leaning faction, led by Lech Wałęsa, and the Kaczyńscy brothers - Lech and Jarosław Kaczyński wanted to instead create coalition with PZPR's satellite parties - the ZSL and SD. The former group formed the Citizens' Movement for Democratic Action faction, and the latter, the Centre Agreement group.

On 7 August, Wałęsa denounced Kiszczak's mission, and declared that the Citizens' Parliamentary Club [pl] (OKP), Solidarity's parliamentary club, will be working with ZSL and SD to form a new government. On the 8th and 9th, Geremek and his allies denounced Wałęsa's decision during meetings of Solidarity's leadership and the OKP respectively. However, Wałęsa did not change his decision, and on 24 August, ZSL and SD rejected Kiszczak, instead throwing their support behind Tadeusz Mazowiecki, who formed a Solidarity-ZSL-SD coalition.

In his pursuit of becoming Poland's strongman President during the transition to democracy, Wałesa set several requirements - most importantly that the Prime Minister be younger and less politically experienced than him. Despite meeting both, Mazowiecki quickly turned out to be the polar opposite of what PC desired. Setting aside anti-communism and embracing reformism, he quickly distanced himself from the Centre Agreement and saught to collaborate with ROAD and the Forum of the Democratic Right (FPD).[2]

Planning the election

On 27 July 1990, the leaders of PC began collecting signatures for a petition aimed at President Jaruzelski, appealing for him to resign and for new indirect presidential elections to be held, with the intention of electing Lech Wałęsa. The petition was opposed by ROAD and FPD, who instead aimed at holding direct presidential elections later in the year. Jaruzelski, knowing the end of his term was near, asked Sejm Marshal Mikołaj Kozakiewicz to call a direct presidential election whenever the concrete date of the election was established.[2]

The Sejm voted to shorten the term of Jaruzelski's Presidency on 21 September. On 27 September, the Parliament passed a constitutional amendment, which defined the criteria for a presidential candidate (and president) and defined the elections by the five-point electoral law (wybory pięcioprzymitonikowe (Polish)) - the elections must be secret, direct, equal, universal and proportional, and on 2 October, the precise dates of the electoral process were defined, as the election was called by Sejm Marshal Kozakiewicz.[7]

It was required to get 100,000 signatures to run in the election. Only six managed to get past the threshold of signatures - Lech Wałęsa, Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Roman Bartoszcze, Leszek Moczulski and an unknown Canadian entrepreneur[3], Stanisław Tymiński.

Candidate selection

Solidarity

Solidarity Citizens' Committee

Lech WałęsaTadeusz Mazowiecki
Chairman of Solidarity
(1980-1991)
Prime Minister of Poland
(1989-1991)
Potential candidates
Lech WałęsaTadeusz MazowieckiAndrzej Stelmachowski
Chairman of Solidarity
(1980-1991)
Prime Minister of Poland
(1989-1991)
Marshal of the Senate
(1989-1991)

The conflict between Wałęsa and Mazowiecki grew irrenconcilable by late 1990. After several failed attempts at reconciliation and political clashes over positions in the Solidarity movement and trade union, the final attempts at finding a compromise for the presidential election were organized by clergy of the Catholic Church. One was held on 7 July, another on 31 August, where Mazowiecki tried and failed to convince Wałęsa to abandon his presidential ambitions, even promising to field a compromise candidate (presumably Senate Marshal Andrzej Stelmachowski). A last chance at conciliation took place on 18 September, during a meeting with Primate Józef Glemp. Ultimately, the two adversaries from Solidarity ran opposing campaigns - Wałęsa was endorsed by the Centre Agreement, and Mazowiecki by the Citizens' Movement for Democratic Action and Forum of the Democratic Right. The Solidarity movement mostly sided with Wałesa during the election[2].

Social Democracy of the Republic of Poland

Social Democracy

Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz
Member of the Sejm
(1989-2005)
Potential candidates
Włodzimierz CimoszewiczEwa ŁętowskaAleksander Kwaśniewski
Member of the Sejm
(1989-2005)
Ombudsman in Poland
(1988-1992)
Chairman of Social Democracy
(1990-1995)

The incumbent President of Poland, Wojciech Jaruzelski, polled to receive 18.5% and 16.6% of the vote if he had ran again in May 1989 and May 1990 respectively. Others from the old communist party, like Władysław Baka or Tadeusz Fiszbach [pl] were also polled to win 2.7% and 1.9% (Baka), and 1.7% in 1990 (Fiszbach) respectively[8]. However, SdRP saught to modernize its image away from the nomenklatura, and the speculated candidates were reaching the end points of their careers regardless. The General Secretary of SdRP, Leszek Miller, at first endorsed the nonpartisan Ombudsman Ewa Łętowska to be the party's candidate. However, she rejected the offer. As such, Miller endorsed SdRP chairman and future President Aleksander Kwaśniewski, who also rejected, knowing he would lose in a landslide and likely undermine his position in the party by doing so. Kwaśniewski controversially chose to endorse Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz instead, who was the leader of SdRP's parliamentary club. The Supreme Council of the party held a vote which confirmed Cimoszewicz's nomination, and he became the official candidate of the party in the presidential election.[2]

Polish People's Party

Polish People's Party

Roman Bartoszcze
Member of the Sejm
(1989-1993)
Potential candidates
Roman BartoszczeJózef Zych
Member of the Sejm
(1989-1993)
Member of the Sejm
(1989-2015)

On 10 October, the Supreme Executive Committee of PSL declared the candidacy of party chairman Roman Bartoszcze. However, Bartoszcze, as an anti-communist oppositionist, was disliked by the postcommunist ex-ZSL wing of the party. As such, the parliamentary club of PSL, which was seated mostly by members from the ZSL wing, declared ZSL activist Józef Zych's candidacy on 11 October. The next day, the crisis was resolved, as the Supreme Council of PSL confirmed Bartoszcze's candidacy, which believed that voters would be much more likely to support a candidate which did not derive from the communist establishment.[2]

Confederation of Independent Poland

Confederation of Independent Poland

Leszek Moczulski
Anti-communist oppositionist
Potential candidates
Leszek MoczulskiLech Wałęsa
Anti-communist oppositionistChairman of Solidarity
(1980-1991)

In August 1990, the KPN was split, with ~300 of its ~1500 members seceding, forming the Confederation of Independent Poland – Democratic Faction (Polish: Konfederacja Polski Niepodległej – Frakcja Demokratyczna, KPN-FD), accusing KPN's leader Leszek Moczulski of authoritarian rule over the party. When elections were called, whereas KPN-FD endorsed Wałęsa outright, KPN offered to endorse Wałęsa, on several conditions: for Wałesa to support an instant resignation of President Jaruzelski, immediate withdrawal of the Soviet Army from Poland and condemn the Balcerowicz Plan. Ultimately, with Wałęsa not fitting the conditions, Leszek Moczulski decided to himself run in the election[9]. With 111 thousand out of 100 thousand required signatures, he managed to pass the threshold to run.[2]

Independents

Independent

Stanisław Tymiński
Entrepreneur

Stanisław Tymiński was a Canadian-Peruvian entrepreneur born in Poland, who returned to Poland to contest the presidential elections. He was the only candidate without any political party's backing who managed to cross the threshold of 100,000 signatures needed to contest the elections, in the meanwhile mass-distributing his political manifesto, "Sacred dogs [pl]".[2]

Rejected candidates

The following candidates registered to run, but failed to cross the threshold of 100,000 signatures required to run in the election[10]:

Campaign

Wałęsa's election poster

First round

While most voters generally believed the candidates they backed would do best to solve most of the country's issues, there were two major outliers - ~40% of voters believed Bartoszcze would best fix the country's agricultural problems, compared to his 7.15% general vote share, and ~20% of voters believed Moczulski would best deal with the communist nomenklatura and withdrawal from the Eastern bloc, compared to his 2.50% vote share.[11]

Mazowiecki's starting situation was rather unfavorable. Despite holding control over TVP, the Polish national television, his team were inept at utilizing such a vital campaign organ (which would provide tremendous help to every consecutive presidential candidate which controlled it). Though well-respected, the public perceived Mazowiecki as uncharismatic[12][13], and his lack of oratory skills led to him massively limiting his public appearances. In light of these obstacles, Mazowiecki tried to deemphasize the importance of his own persona, instead elevating his electoral platform, a strategy that found little appeal outside of intelligentsia circles (which already overwhelmingly supported him). A defining symbol of Mazowiecki's personal isolation was an advertisement his team aired at the beginning of the campaign, presenting him walking around a park, surrounded by bodyguards. In contrast, Wałesa's image was quite overt - Solidarity's chairman held dozens of rallies, meetings and other public events, his persona was charming, characterized as a "plebeian tribune", a "sheriff" bringing communists to justice, promising to directly overlook everything that needed resolution - such a persona enjoyed much public popularity[2]. Tymiński's campaign, that completely faltered at the start, blossomed after TVP began the period of airing campaign ads. His advertisements, which in a simple fasion criticized the government and proposed a "real alternative". The advertisements were so effective that even in an entire voivodeship where Tymiński's campaign had no presence, he had gotten the largest amount of votes of any candidate in the first round. However, that did not mean Tymiński did not campaign in other ways - he held several rallies where he tried to expand his appeal to certain groups[2].

The Prime Minister's presidential campaign oriented around defending and lauding his accomplishments - notably beginning the economic transformation, signing a treaty with Germany that put an end to fears of Germany pursuing reclamation of its pre-war borders - and convincing undecideds to see the reforms positively. However, his campaign had very little in terms of actual election promises. Meanwhile, Wałesa promised to soften the mass privatization schemes of Finance Minister Leszek Balcerowicz which was largely responsible for perpetually increasing poverty and unemployment and give every Pole a "hundred million (old) złotys" to let citizens better participate in the economic restructuring. Despite his campaign team writing a formal electoral program titled "New beginning", Wałęsa did not stick to it, and later admitted he did not even read it[2]. Wałesa did not, however, promise to solve every problem, unlike Tymiński, whose extreme promises became a major point of success among the increasing crowds of citizens dissatisfied with the new rule of Solidarity[2].

At later points of the campaign, Mazowiecki's campaign turned rather negative, disorienting his own voterbase and hurting his image, and began airing advertisements showing Wałesa amputating Poland from western Europe with an axe, or with said axe destroying an alarm clock which had previously been repaired by presumably Mazowiecki.[2] Wałęsa's response to such advertisements was to air his own, notably a cartoon in which, weilding the same axe, he destroyed the "thick stroke"[b] and chased away red spiders, signifying communists. Mazowiecki's ally, Gazeta Wyborcza editor-in-chief Adam Michnik, presented Wałesa as a dangerous strongman who would introduce a "catastrophic, Peronist-esque regime"[6]. In some circles, Mazowiecki was accused of secretly having Jewish ancestry, a notion which he rejected and condemned.[14] Meanwhile, Wałęsa insinuated Mazowiecki led an inactive, elite government that prided itself in the prestige of governance alone, contrasting it with proposed his model of real societal intervention[2].

Mazowiecki, with his fatally operated campaign, quickly declined in opinion polls. Despite them showing Mazowiecki continuously declining, Mazowiecki's team was in denial that they had fallen behind Wałęsa (who by November polled 10 points ahead of the Prime Minister). His fall was so severe that he had fallen even behind Tymiński - who was considered such a nonfactor that Mazowiecki's team only took him into account after Tymiński accused him of treason during a rally a mere week before election day[2].

On 25 November, the first round of voting took place. In an upset victory, Mazowiecki failed to enter the second round, falling five percentage points behind Tymiński. The results were as follows: Wałęsa - 39.96%, Tymiński - 23.10%, Mazowiecki - 18.08%, Cimoszewicz - 9.21%, Bartoszcze - 7.15%, Moczulski - 2.50%. The day after the election, Mazowiecki, humiliated, announced that he would soon be resigning from the office of Prime Minister, which he did on 12 January next year.

Second round

After the announcement of the results, Wałęsa received a large array of endorsements from the majority of his former opponents - on 28 November, OKP formally endorsed Wałęsa's candidacy. On November 30, the Catholic Church in Poland, which did not directly endorse any candidate beforehand, finally chose to endorse Wałęsa. On 1 and 2 December, ROAD and then Mazowiecki begrudgingly endorsed him aswell. PSL and KPN also endorsed him - only Cimoszewicz, who represented the postcommunist camp, did not support either candidate[2].

Tymiński attempted to extend his appeal towards Mazowiecki's and Cimoszewicz's liberal and leftist voters. His attempts at broadening his voterbase, like opposing anti-abortion laws, or praising President Jaruzelski and the period of martial law, contradicted his previous statements about his deep belief in Catholic social teaching, and targeted the intelligentsia environment which were not receptive to his overall populist image in general. Tymiński's momentum, which rose extremely quickly, also seemed to reach its peak at the beginning of the second round[2].

On 1 December, a pseudo-debate, which took form of a joint press conference where the candidates were free to talk with eachother, took place. Tymiński appeared with a black briefcase, claiming it contained incriminating evidence against Wałesa, who replied by ordering Tymiński to show the evidence, assuming Tymiński was bluffing. Tymiński, who did not open the briefcase, proved the clear loser of the debate. A legitimate debate planned for the next day was cancelled when Tymiński refused to take part, his image being damaged enough in the previous debate[2].

TVP released material in a smear campaign against Tymiński on 4 December, pinning several allegations against him, among which, that he abused his wife and children. Several years after the campaign, Tymiński won a lawsuit against TVP for defamation, but at that point the election had already been long over[2].

On 9 December, the second round of the presidential election took place, in which Wałesa won in a landslide victory of 74.25%, compared to Tymiński's 25.75%, which was the largest landslide in the history of Polish elections.

Campaign spending

Candidate19902024
SpentCostSpentCost
Wałęsa5,551,556,20584588,303,40513
Tymiński3,332,461,00087753,006,33614
Mazowiecki5,667,041,184190690,140,31630
Cimoszewicz1,827,428,175120729,067,18819
Bartoszcze436,412,9503946,941,6126
Moczulski369,129,8528975,871,40214
Source: [15]

Opinion polls

PollsterDate of pollingWałęsa
"S" (PC)
Tymiński
IN
Mazowiecki
"S" (ROAD/FPD)
Cimoszewicz
SdRP
Bartoszcze
PSL
Moczulski
KPN
Others and
Undecideds
Election results25 November 199039.9623.1018.089.217.152.50-
CBOS22-23 November 19903327181093-
CBOS17-18 November 199027201756124
CBOS10-11 November 199030.512.620.65.87.61.921.0
OBOP23-24 October 199033(Others)2823133
CBOS17-23 October 199033.2(Others)41.820.3
CBOS11-16 October 199027.3(Others)39.827.7
Election called by Sejm Marshal Mikołaj Kozakiewicz (2 October 1990)[16]
CBOSSeptember 199017.8(Others)15.866.4[c]
CBOSJune 199015.6(Others)18.066.4[d]
CBOSMay 199016.1(Others)23.960[e]
Tadeusz Mazowiecki becomes Prime Minister of Poland (24 August 1989)
CBOSMay 198918.7(Others)2.379[f]
Sources: [11][17][8][15][18][19]

Results

CandidatePartyFirst roundSecond round
Votes%Votes%
Lech WałęsaSolidarity (PC faction)[20]6,569,88939.9610,622,69674.25
Stanisław TymińskiIndependent3,797,60523.103,683,09825.75
Tadeusz MazowieckiSolidarity (ROAD and FPD factions)[20]2,973,26418.08
Włodzimierz CimoszewiczSocial Democracy of the Republic of Poland1,514,0259.21
Roman BartoszczePolish People's Party1,176,1757.15
Leszek MoczulskiConfederation of Independent Poland411,5162.50
Total16,442,474100.0014,305,794100.00
Valid votes16,442,47498.4514,305,79497.65
Invalid/blank votes259,5261.55344,2432.35
Total votes16,702,000100.0014,650,037100.00
Registered voters/turnout27,545,62560.6327,436,07853.40
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Aftermath

Bielecki in 1991

Prime Minister Mazowiecki, utterly humiliated, resigned from his office soon after the election. His successor, Jan Krzysztof Bielecki, was another liberal, who was again selected by the criteria Wałęsa set out for any possible Prime Ministers - to be younger and less experienced politically. Bielecki, though not significantly changing the course of the country, was more subservient to the now-President and his vision.[2]

ROAD and FPD were devestated by Mazowiecki's loss. In May 1991, they united into the Democratic Union (UD) (with a small social-democratic splinter forming the Democratic-Social Movement). UD contested the 1991 parliamentary election, becoming the biggest party in the Sejm with 62 seats until a splinter led by former FPD members.[9]

President-elect Wałęsa resigned from his role as Chairman of the Solidarity trade union shortly after becoming president, endorsing Lech Kaczyński to become the new chairman of the trade union. He faced the liberal-aligned Bogdan Borusewicz and relatively nonpartisan Marian Krzaklewski. On the 3rd Congress of Solidarity on 22-25 February, despite Wałesa's endorsement, Kaczyński lost the vote for union leadership to Krzaklewski, who would become an important politician for the duration of the next decade.[2]

Starting in January 1991[9], Roman Bartoszcze's position within PSL began dissipating. His period as chairman concluded when after controversially signing a cooperation agreement with Rural Solidarity and PSL "Solidarity", party leadership decided to oust him and replace him with Waldemar Pawlak, who would become a future Prime Minister. Bartoszcze's ousting led to him creating a new party, the Polish People's Christian Forum "Fatherland" [pl], which had significantly less success than PSL and never won any seats in any election.[2]

Leszek Moczulski, who used the presidential election to spread his agenda and promulgate his party, succeded in his goals, as KPN won 7.5% of the vote in the following 1991 parliamentary election, three times as much as he had personally amassed in the presidential election. However, the low result itself was a point of disappointment for Moczulski and his party.[2]

Tymiński became largely irrelevant following the election, sometimes appearing in elections as a perennial candidate. He founded a political party, which was vehemently opposed by a large sector of society - 38% supported its delegalization[21]. In 1991, its candidates were disqualified in 90% of districts[22], and would only secure 52,735 votes, winning 3 seats. The party would not win any seats in any following selections. After running for president again in 2005, he only won 23,545 votes[2]. He contested another election in 2023, running for Senate, winning only 18,052[23] votes[24]. Though his political career was barely relevant following the first direct presidential election in Poland, his name became famous worldwide, and many would try to draw lines between Tymiński and other "populists", such as American presidential candidate Donald Trump or Law and Justice chairman Jarosław Kaczyński[25].

Results by Voivodeship

First round

Lech WałęsaStanisław TymińskiTadeusz MazowieckiWłodzimierz CimoszewiczRoman BartoszczeLeszek MoczulskiTurnout
Voivodeship#%#%#%#%#%#%#%
Bialskopodlaskie52 28241,47%26 06320,69%85096,75%12 69410,08%23 41018,58%30342,41%128 59759,64%
Białostockie127 53842,50%36 04612,01%38 94812,98%81 58127,18%11 7033,90%43021,43%304 82260,95%
Bielskie185 83245,08%88 75621,53%81 44719,76%28 1166,82%16 1563,92%11 9042,89%418 86366,44%
Bydgoskie156 97131,13%139 96427,75%93 10218,46%65 33912,96%35 5877,06%13 3332,64%511 42664,91%
Chełmskie39 42739,66%21 13721,26%73167,36%12 75312,83%15 82215,92%29602,98%101 42358,00%
Ciechanowskie62 02236,19%55 69832,50%11 6576,80%17 54910,24%21 65512,63%28091,64%174 87257,67%
Częstochowskie129 51437,23%111 13531,95%48 63113,98%25 0457,20%22 5146,47%11 0353,17%353 50362,57%
Elbląskie61 02131,66%60 31531,29%32 99517,12%19 63210,19%14 3177,43%44712,32%195 53159,52%
Gdańskie336 89352,28%92 96514,43%142 38222,09%38 4545,97%19 0312,95%14 7212,28%652 48763,23%
Gorzowskie60 60529,79%54 42326,75%46 02722,63%24 39411,99%13 2946,54%46712,30%206 74959,86%
Jeleniogórskie75 14834,17%60 76027,63%47 26421,49%21 8519,94%89074,05%56952,59%223 07360,44%
Kaliskie101 24531,43%87 93627,30%54 18016,82%36 29611,27%35 51411,03%69292,15%328 59665,56%
Katowickie505 89130,99%507 73731,10%398 62724,42%126 8697,77%31 2941,92%62 1443,81%1 653 25257,35%
Kieleckie159 47234,40%121 53726,22%50 85510,97%51 54211,12%68 23114,72%11 8892,56%471 81857,72%
Konińskie72 75337,60%53 83527,82%17 9809,29%19 60610,13%25 38913,12%39282,03%197 59760,33%
Koszalińskie65 09331,04%60 34428,78%42 25920,15%22 80910,88%14 2446,79%49352,35%212 90959,08%
Krakowskie279 19251,16%55 02810,08%138 54825,39%29 1295,34%27 2044,99%16 5883,04%553 36060,34%
Krośnieńskie107 21750,84%45 06621,37%20 8439,88%13 3956,35%18 7928,91%55812,65%215 34563,59%
Legnickie69 69533,03%68 28032,36%39 26918,61%17 4078,25%11 2415,33%50932,41%213 67261,11%
Leszczyńskie43 70224,76%50 56028,65%35 65220,20%20 99911,90%21 95112,44%36072,04%180 14567,79%
Lubelskie197 69646,65%74 55917,60%49 08711,58%39 2749,27%50 39211,89%12 7423,01%430 19158,47%
Łomżyńskie71 26350,64%35 79225,43%93676,66%9 4106,69%12 2948,74%25971,85%143 51159,29%
Łódzkie233 99243,57%112 80521,00%105 60619,66%59 87811,15%11 0452,05%13 7452,60%543 44258,76%
Nowosądeckie181 78362,29%32 91911,28%36 98912,68%12 4484,27%20 7917,12%68802,36%299 20263,39%
Olsztyńskie92 94430,63%102 68433,84%45 27914,92%34 57011,39%20 9666,91%69302,28%307 98159,94%
Opolskie140 07337,53%79 06421,19%89 43723,97%30 6188,20%23 4326,28%10 5602,83%381 09353,28%
Ostrołęckie70 35344,70%48 09230,56%9 7436,19%11 7907,49%14 9559,50%24561,56%160 72758,48%
Pilskie53 72525,24%56 79926,69%47 23622,19%27 66213,00%22 00410,34%54162,54%217 15866,16%
Piotrkowskie115 91443,47%66 28724,86%24 9319,35%24 0389,01%29 05710,90%64312,41%271 66259,04%
Płockie76 61435,55%72 64933,71%20 2449,39%20 1709,36%21 83910,13%40051,86%219 34659,25%
Poznańskie197 63032,21%129 25221,06%181 13629,52%60 4909,86%31 9025,20%13 1812,15%662 62068,59%
Przemyskie81 62448,17%28 37216,74%17 66710,43%10 9926,49%26 99915,93%37912,24%173 29661,24%
Radomskie152 94450,54%54 23617,92%23 9057,90%27 3489,04%37 99912,56%61802,04%308 17158,35%
Rzeszowskie173 17454,89%57 11418,10%31 82310,09%18 1445,75%27 0568,58%81622,59%321 60465,43%
Siedleckie121 73846,05%67 36025,48%14 5815,52%17 6166,66%39 00514,76%40481,53%269 98059,09%
Sieradzkie59 52333,87%51 31729,20%16 1449,18%17 92310,20%27 27815,52%35802,04%178 95160,82%
Skierniewickie69 46441,03%47 14827,85%15 2268,99%13 6598,07%20 39012,05%33922,00%172 27356,54%
Słupskie49 23030,36%47 05529,02%31 42619,38%18 06311,14%12 4657,69%39192,42%164 51358,37%
Suwalskie65 75937,50%50 91829,04%19 16510,93%19 73811,26%15 4188,79%43452,48%178 24755,52%
Szczecińskie116 80028,16%105 90025,53%117 94928,43%40 9509,87%17 5284,23%15 6893,78%420 35859,66%
Tarnobrzeskie108 57244,81%60 42424,94%16 8196,94%18 3297,56%32 52313,42%56522,33%247 94659,54%
Tarnowskie149 95853,09%35 32012,50%40 37914,29%13 0954,64%36 32312,86%73952,62%289 50063,47%
Toruńskie82 81829,34%76 51627,11%54 44319,29%29 03810,29%22 9718,14%64882,30%286 00260,56%
Wałbrzyskie107 83733,95%95 83930,17%61 44919,34%31 4139,89%13 2124,16%79202,49%321 80259,76%
Warszawskie651 94750,67%162 76112,65%321 57124,99%108 5938,44%21 1481,64%20 6321,60%1 296 64464,28%
Włocławskie59 27433,87%43 81025,03%18 62110,64%24 96714,27%24 31013,89%40372,31%178 03257,33%
Wrocławskie209 98442,14%101 73820,42%118 98723,88%36 4447,31%20 8354,18%10 3142,07%503 88660,28%
Zamojskie94 89645,52%32 19815,44%10 5685,07%16 6698,00%49 48323,74%46592,23%212 70060,23%
Zielonogórskie80 52729,08%71 09225,68%66 99524,20%35 23612,73%16 2995,89%67412,43%281 57561,03%
Poland6 569 88939,96%3 797 60523,10%2 973 36418,08%1 514 0259,21%1 176 1757,15%411 5162,50%16 702 00060,63%

Second round

VoivodeshipLech WałęsaStanisław TymińskiTurnout
#%#%#%
Bialskopodlaskie80 10469,30%35 48230,70%118 08254,78%
Białostockie188 57170,15%80 22729,85%274 94654,92%
Bielskie305 05282,83%63 24617,17%377 06159,79%
Bydgoskie275 40164,79%149 69135,21%437 75855,50%
Chełmskie56 91564,36%31 51435,64%90 76151,84%
Ciechanowskie90 87258,90%63 41341,10%158 17159,64%
Częstochowskie204 65469,62%89 30830,38%300 79053,13%
Elbląskie102 56464,24%57 09435,76%163 91949,82%
Gdańskie516 06187,38%74 50212,62%603 57158,64%
Gorzowskie103 82362,67%61 85437,33%170 38949,26%
Jeleniogórskie129 95671,31%52 29428,69%186 72250,50%
Kaliskie181 83365,68%95 01434,32%286 18257,01%
Katowickie956 83772,29%366 85427,71%1 354 20146,84%
Kieleckie262 31564,33%145 43135,67%417,76351,11%
Konińskie104 77361,43%65 79638,57%175 50253,40%
Koszalińskie108 56062,51%65 10737,49%178 43249,43%
Krakowskie476 31390,20%51 7769,80%536 48458,47%
Krośnieńskie160 54880,61%38 62119,39%203 38260,04%
Legnickie121 85569,37%53 80430,63%179 58251,07%
Leszczyńskie89 87161,17%57 04638,83%153 03357,56%
Lubelskie295 26176,74%89 48223,26%392 63853,25%
Łomżyńskie99 29775,23%32 70024,77%135 11555,77%
Łódzkie355 95479,27%93 06620,73%459 35249,54%
Nowosądeckie275 56490,87%27 6909,13%309 25565,24%
Olsztyńskie149 93059,02%104 01340,98%260 64250,71%
Opolskie256 80079,11%67 82720,89%332 97546,47%
Ostrołęckie101 55269,84%43 85830,16%149 21154,22%
Pilskie107 83861,50%67 68037,50%182 87555,67%
Piotrkowskie169 35772,27%64 96927,73%240 00552,12%
Płockie112 83859,10%78 01440,90%195 46852,74%
Poznańskie382 21974,63%129 93825,37%528 19854,59%
Przemyskie130 47979,68%33 26720,32%167 20459,15%
Radomskie220 86577,94%62 50422,06%289 62854,76%
Rzeszowskie258 06085,72%42 98814,28%307 73662,54%
Siedleckie177 95772,88%66 20827,12%250 08854,68%
Sieradzkie91 54960,30%60 26639,70%156 13153,07%
Skierniewickie102 18469,28%45 31630,72%150 90349,52%
Słupskie84 70763,07%49 59536,93%138 06648,83%
Suwalskie99 10263,15%57 82036,85%160 53749,91%
Szczecińskie219 56266,68%109 72933,32%337 52159,64%
Tarnobrzeskie157 46070,24%66 72129,76%229 10155,15%
Tarnowskie248 36689,13%30 27710,87%284 54662,24%
Toruńskie160 86767,84%76 26932,16%243 05551,28%
Wałbrzyskie187 64370,53%78 41029,47%271 73450,39%
Warszawskie913 62586,87%138 10613,13%1 072 54257,02%
Włocławskie92 78359,33%63 60940,67%160 20351,42%
Wrocławskie364 11982,72%76 14217,28%448 91253,63%
Zamojskie143 16172,95%53 09027,05%200 47456,76%
Zielonogórskie146 91966,06%75 47033,94%229 19149,65%
Poland10 622 69674,25%3 683 09825,75%14 650 03753,40%

Notes

References

  • Obwieszczenie PKW z dn. 26 XI 1990 r., Dziennik Ustaw. Nr 83, poz. 483 (Polish)
  • Obwieszczenie PKW z dn. 10 XII 1990 r., Dz.U. Nr 85, poz. 499 (Polish)