List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 69

This is a list of cases reported in volume 69 (2 Wall.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1864 and 1865.[1]

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "nominative reports").

John William Wallace

Starting with the 66th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was John William Wallace. Wallace was Reporter of Decisions from 1863 to 1874, covering volumes 68 through 90 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 23 of his Wallace's Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, The Andromeda is 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 481 (1865).

Wallace's Reports were the final nominative reports for the US Supreme Court; starting with volume 91, cases were identified simply as "(volume #) U.S. (page #) (year)".

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 69 U.S. (2 Wall.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[2] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) were decided the Court's membership began at ten justices, then shrank to nine upon the death of Chief Justice Taney in October 1864, and increased again to the statutory number of ten when Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase took office in December 1864:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. TaneyChief JusticeMarylandJohn MarshallMarch 15, 1836
(29–15)
March 28, 1836

October 12, 1864
(Died)
Salmon P. ChaseChief JusticeOhioRoger B. TaneyDecember 6, 1864
(Acclamation)
December 15, 1864

May 7, 1873
(Died)
James Moore WayneAssociate JusticeGeorgiaWilliam JohnsonJanuary 9, 1835
(Acclamation)
January 14, 1835

July 5, 1867
(Died)
John CatronAssociate JusticeTennesseenewly-created seatMarch 8, 1837
(28–15)
May 1, 1837

May 30, 1865
(Died)
Samuel NelsonAssociate JusticeNew YorkSmith ThompsonFebruary 14, 1845
(Acclamation)
February 27, 1845

November 28, 1872
(Retired)
Robert Cooper GrierAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaHenry BaldwinAugust 4, 1846
(Acclamation)
August 10, 1846

January 31, 1870
(Retired)
Nathan CliffordAssociate JusticeMaineBenjamin Robbins CurtisJanuary 12, 1858
(26–23)
January 21, 1858

July 25, 1881
(Died)
Noah Haynes SwayneAssociate JusticeOhioJohn McLeanJanuary 24, 1862
(38–1)
January 27, 1862

January 24, 1881
(Retired)
Samuel Freeman MillerAssociate JusticeIowaPeter Vivian DanielJuly 16, 1862
(Acclamation)
July 21, 1862

October 13, 1890
(Died)
David DavisAssociate JusticeIllinoisJohn Archibald CampbellDecember 8, 1862
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1862

March 4, 1877
(Resigned)
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly-created seatMarch 10, 1863
(Acclamation)
May 10, 1863

December 1, 1897
(Retired)

Notable Cases in 69 U.S. (2 Wall.)

Sketch of interior of a slave ship

The Slavers Cases

The four Slavers Cases ((The Bark Kate), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 350 (1865); (The Bark Sarah), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 366 (1865); (The Weathergage), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 375 (1865); and (The Bark Reindeer), 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 383 (1865)), involve three ships seized by the federal government near New York City, and one seized off Newport, Rhode Island. The ships appeared to be set up for the slave trade, and had voyages planned to the western coast of Africa where the slave trade flourished at the time. The cargo, fittings, and other circumstances surrounding the ships led to a presumption that they were engaged in slaving, contrary to several federal statutes.

In The Bark Kate (at pp. 363–64), Chief Justice Chase wrote in his opinion for the Court:

In considering this evidence, it is to be borne in mind that for more than three hundred years the western coast of Africa has been scourged by the atrocities of the slave trade, and that this inhuman traffic, although at length proscribed and pursued with severe penalties by nearly all Christian nations, has continued, with almost unabated activity and ferocity, even to our times. Fears of forfeiture of property, and even of life, have been easily overcome by hopes of enormous gains, and so long as markets for slaves remain open, and imperfect execution of the laws permits the expectation of profit from crime, the most conspicuous results of penal legislation will be, more cunning in the contrivance and more adroitness in the use of means for evading or defeating its intent and operation. The difficulty of penetrating the disguises of crime is enhanced in the case of the slave trade by the circumstance that a very considerable traffic [in lawful commerce] . . . has sprung up and is carried on with the same African coast from which human cargoes are collected. It does not seem unreasonable, since it is the paramount interest of humanity that the traffic in men be at all events arrested, to require of the trader who engages in a commerce [that] . . . is necessarily suspicious from its theater and circumstances, that he keep his operations so clear and so distinct in their character as to repel the imputation of prohibited purpose.

In each of the four cases the Supreme Court upheld seizure of the ships by the federal government.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 69 U.S. (2 Wall.)

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Dermott v. Jones1 (1865)SwaynenonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Hawthorne v. Calef10 (1865)NelsonnonenoneMe.reversed
Drury v. Foster24 (1865)Nelsonnonenone"Federal Ct. Minn." (sic)affirmed
Miles v. Caldwell35 (1865)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Mo.reversed
Providence T. Co. v. Norris45 (1865)FieldnonenoneC.C.D.R.I.reversed
Gregg v. Forsyth56 (1865)NelsonnonenoneC.C.D. Ill.dismissed
Banks v. Ogden57 (1865)ChasenonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Brooks v. Martin70 (1864)MillernoneCatron"Federal Ct. Wis." (sic)affirmed
Badger v. Badger87 (1865)GriernonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Brobst v. Brobst96 (1865)Nelsonnonenonenot indicatedcertification
Day v. Gallup97 (1865)Waynenonenone"Federal Ct. Minn." (sic)dismissed
Humiston v. Stainthorp106 (1865)NelsonnonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.dismissed
Murray v. Lardner110 (1865)SwaynenonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Heckers v. Fowler123 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Ex parte Dugan134 (1865)per curiamnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.certiorari granted
The Circassian135 (1865)ChasenoneNelsonS.D. Fla.affirmed
Freeborn v. Smith160 (1865)GriernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Nev.affirmed
Sheets v. Selden's Lessee177 (1865)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Chittenden v. Brewster191 (1865)NelsonnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Campbell v. Read198 (1865)ChasenonenoneC.C.D.C.dismissed
Bank Tax Case200 (1865)NelsonnonenoneN.Y.reversed
Florentine v. Barton210 (1865)GriernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Cooke v. United States218 (1864)Chasenonenonenot indicateddismissal denied
Smith v. United States219 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Miller v. Sherry237 (1865)SwaynenonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Marine Bank v. Fulton Bank252 (1865)MillernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
The Venice258 (1865)ChasenonenoneS.D. Fla.affirmed
Pico v. United States279 (1865)FieldnonenoneN.D. Cal.affirmed
Bronson v. La Crosse & M.R.R. Co.283 (1864)NelsonnonenoneC.C.D. Wis.reversed
Ransom v. Williams313 (1865)SwaynenonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Case v. Brown320 (1865)GriernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Harvey v. Tyler328 (1865)MillernonenoneW.D. Va.affirmed
The Slavers I350 (1865)ChasenonenoneS.D.N.Y.affirmed
The Slavers II366 (1865)CliffordnonenoneS.D.N.Y.affirmed
The Slavers III375 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
The Slavers IV383 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.D.R.I.affirmed
Albany B. Case403 (1865)per curiamnonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.affirmed
Mrs. Alexander's Cotton404 (1865)ChasenonenoneS.D. Ill.reversed
Tobey v. Leonards423 (1865)WaynenonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Milwaukee & M.R.R. Co. v. Soutter I440 (1865)Chasenonenone"Federal Ct. Wis." (sic)dismissal denied
United States v. Billing444 (1865)Griernonenonenot indicatedaffirmed
Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. Joliffe450 (1865)FieldnoneMillerSan Francisco Cnty. Ct.affirmed
The Baigorry474 (1865)Chasenonenonenot indicatedaffirmed
The Andromeda481 (1865)ChaseNelsonnoneS.D. Fla.affirmed
Kutter v. Smith491 (1865)MillernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Levy Court v. Coroner501 (1865)MillernonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Milwaukee & M.R.R. Co. v. Soutter II510 (1865)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Wis.reversed
United States v. Stone525 (1865)Griernonenone"Federal Ct. Kan." (sic)affirmed
The Ann Caroline538 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
The Morning Light550 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Gordon v. United States561 (1865)per curiamnonenoneCt. Cl.dismissed
The Sutter Case562 (1865)NelsonnonenoneN.D. Cal.reversed
United States v. Pacheco587 (1865)FieldnonenoneN.D. Cal.affirmed
Read v. Bowman591 (1865)CliffordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Hogan v. Page605 (1865)NelsonnonenoneMo.reversed
Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.609 (1865)MillernoneNelsonC.C.D. Wis.reversed
The Fossat Case649 (1864)NelsonnoneCliffordD. Cal.reversed
Lowber v. Bangs728 (1865)SwaynenoneCliffordC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Ex parte Fleming759 (1865)MillernonenoneD. Wis.mandamus denied

Notes and references

See also

Certificate of division

External links