User contributions for 92.67.227.181

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:5013:50, 28 July 2022diff hist +6‎ Talk:Common green bottle fly‎ →‎Myiasis: clarification
13:4413:44, 28 July 2022diff hist +385‎ Talk:Common green bottle fly‎ →‎Myiasis: new sectionTag: New topic
13:2713:27, 28 July 2022diff hist +82‎ Lucilia caesar‎ that name can also refer to L. sericata, according to that article
13:0913:09, 28 July 2022diff hist +525‎ Talk:Lucilia caesar‎ →‎The image looks crushed: new sectionTag: New topic

13:0913:09, 23 July 2022diff hist +729‎ User talk:Sideswipe9th‎ →‎Re: Not assuming good faith on User talk:Sideswipe9th.: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic

23:4423:44, 18 July 2022diff hist +49‎ Talk:Arabic star‎ NOTFORUM doesn't apply here, because my comment is part of a discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. It has nothing to do with unrelated topics, or statements based on anyone's thoughts or feelings.Tags: Manual revert Reverted
23:4323:43, 18 July 2022diff hist +1,287‎ User talk:Sideswipe9th‎ →‎Don't just delete comments: new sectionTag: New topic
23:1523:15, 18 July 2022diff hist +49‎ Talk:Arabic star‎ don't delete comments, reply insteadTags: Manual revert Reverted
23:1423:14, 18 July 2022diff hist +280‎ User talk:Praxidicae‎ →‎Don't just delete comments: new sectionTag: New topic
17:5717:57, 18 July 2022diff hist +371‎ Arabic star‎ +ref
17:1717:17, 18 July 2022diff hist +40‎ Star (glyph)‎ →‎Five points: I like the layout change, but the change in wording crucially changed the meaning and it was no longer correct
16:4716:47, 18 July 2022diff hist +498‎ Talk:Star (glyph)‎ →‎⛯ and ☼: new sectionTag: New topic
16:4016:40, 18 July 2022diff hist +276‎ Star (glyph)‎ adding images for glyphs that aren't widely supported yet
16:3116:31, 18 July 2022diff hist +299‎ Wikipedia talk:Extended image syntax‎ →‎em sizes: new sectionTag: New topic
16:2316:23, 18 July 2022diff hist +978‎ Star (glyph)‎ there's no reason for most of the stars to be that big and there's no need for so much padding; it becomes a real usability issue: I could fit only four (4!) on screen
14:4414:44, 18 July 2022diff hist 0‎ Star (glyph)‎ →‎Five points: I don't know why the software made the entire row header cells, in no universe was that a reasonable interpretation of the wikitext
14:4114:41, 18 July 2022diff hist +361‎ Star (glyph)‎ it officially has five points; some fonts might not go along with this and that is certainly defensible, but for now this is what Unicode says
14:1314:13, 18 July 2022diff hist +49‎ Talk:Arabic star‎ →‎IslamTag: Reverted
14:0214:02, 18 July 2022diff hist +1,192‎ Arabic star‎ the original shape of the asterisk was ※ + it has nothing to do with typewriters, because fonts that mimic such typewriters would show five lobes on the regular asterisk as well (look at Courier New for example) + unichar introduces extraneous space; this wasn't its intended purpose and the codepoint ✻ itself isn't really the topic here, we show it for illustration only + Star of David