User contributions for OyMosby

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

19:1919:19, 31 May 2024diff hist +68‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article
19:1019:10, 31 May 2024diff hist +774‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article: ReplyTag: Reply
19:0219:02, 31 May 2024diff hist +1,156‎ User talk:OyMosby‎ →‎Dalmatia reverts: ReplyTag: Reply
18:5318:53, 31 May 2024diff hist +4‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ →‎Genocide: link to Armenian genocide article
18:5018:50, 31 May 2024diff hist 0‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ More appropriate here
18:4818:48, 31 May 2024diff hist −2,855‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ →‎As a military, political, and economic tactic: agree with other user this is UNDUE and not consensus as many non-Italian victims was targeted in this reprisal. As with the lead, this modern take on Yugoslav wars provides a good example.Tag: harv-error
18:3318:33, 31 May 2024diff hist +35‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ These were swapped but this eems more notorious and fitting for the lead of the two in regarding to the Yugoslav Wars and coining of the phrase.

16:1716:17, 27 May 2024diff hist +1,298‎ Dalmatia‎ Undid revision 1225720213 by Botushali (talk) Isn’t the onus on the one changing the stable form? Hence removing long-standing information should require talking it out on the talk page. It seems recently removed rather than added.Tag: Undo

18:0518:05, 26 May 2024diff hist +118‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article: ReplyTag: Reply
17:4917:49, 26 May 2024diff hist +341‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article: ReplyTag: Reply
17:4017:40, 26 May 2024diff hist +134‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article
17:3817:38, 26 May 2024diff hist +40‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article
17:3817:38, 26 May 2024diff hist +715‎ User talk:Buidhe‎ →‎Ethnic Cleansing Article: new sectionTag: New topic
17:3217:32, 26 May 2024diff hist +53‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ →‎Etymology: from source
17:2217:22, 26 May 2024diff hist +70‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ →‎Etymology: reference to the name of the genocide
17:2017:20, 26 May 2024diff hist −181‎ Ethnic cleansing‎ →‎Etymology: Undue given why would it be significant who was the first individual in every nationality to use the term, also for next sentence is not what the sources said. It said both factions used the word. Not the order.
14:0514:05, 26 May 2024diff hist +2,151‎ List of ethnic cleansing campaigns‎ →‎1940s: This was removed as “unsourced” in September 2023 despite being sourced.

16:4316:43, 25 May 2024diff hist +45‎ List of genocides‎ →‎List of genocides: given this covers all threeTag: Disambiguation links added
16:3416:34, 25 May 2024diff hist +14‎ List of genocides‎ →‎List of genocides: why was this part removed? Seems a significant change of context
16:1516:15, 25 May 2024diff hist +38‎ Pula‎ →‎Post–World War II and modern era: citations needed

22:4622:46, 24 May 2024diff hist −10‎ Dubrovnik‎ Seems undue since both historically used and where the city is in modern day. Did the edit have consensus when added? Returned to typical format like other city articles
22:4122:41, 24 May 2024diff hist −8‎ Dubrovnik‎ Historically both were used.
22:0222:02, 24 May 2024diff hist +53‎ Rijeka‎ Undid revision 1225463494 by 37.212.57.4 (talk) Why? UnexplainedTag: Undo
22:0222:02, 24 May 2024diff hist +29‎ Zadar‎ Undid revision 1225463247 by 37.212.57.4 (talk) Why? UnexplainedTag: Undo

04:5304:53, 21 May 2024diff hist −8‎ Rijeka‎ Again, just as all other language versions listed, follow format
04:5104:51, 21 May 2024diff hist −37‎ Zadar‎ Format for city articles with multi lingual name listing
04:4904:49, 21 May 2024diff hist −49‎ Split, Croatia‎ Per format of city articles with multiple language names
04:4104:41, 21 May 2024diff hist +54‎ Zadar‎ If concern is for modern day Italian speaking population in this region, this would appear better wording
04:3604:36, 21 May 2024diff hist +96‎ Split, Croatia‎ If representation for the modern Italian speaking population there, this would seem a better wording
04:2804:28, 21 May 2024diff hist −166‎ Split, Croatia‎ This was added with an edit summary “fix”. Spalato became the official name in the 18th century so it seems undue and misleading to imply it was the definitive historical name. There were multiple forms. Hence the original “others names” section redirect makes more sense. Unless there was mass consensus on this which I didn’t see?
04:1504:15, 21 May 2024diff hist −284‎ Zadar‎ Was there consensus for this addition? Seems numerous edit wars had followed. There wasn’t only one historical name so this is undue and pov. Mentions of Zadar in the 12th century had predated Zara of the 15th century per Etymology section. And there were other names before. Why would Zara be defacto the historical term? This implies some nation’s having more important than others. The original direction to the naming section is neutral. Has been for many years. Unless I am missing something?