Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

• LordVoldemort728 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I have created more than 200 articles in which 192 articles exists in main page and they all are notable. I only create articles about Notable Politician like Member of Parliament, Member of Legislative Assembly and Head of State or Government. I know all about WP:GNG and I am also very active in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for all Indian articles. You can see here Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/India I have discussed about the deletions in almost all articles listed there. You can find me at that page. (Note - I have discussed many of the deletion with my old username User:Contributor008 which I globally renamed so you can find my these two usernames in the page respectively. LordVoldemort728 (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Suhaengpyeongga (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I have created 29 articles on Korean music. Only a few of them are stub-class and none of them were deleted. Also, I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 수행평가 (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Bquast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello, I write a lot of pages on technology standards, and the United Nations system as well as other topics. I have tried to follow the normal publication process, but ICT standards move quite fast and waiting 3 months for publication is not ideal.

I have made some honest (minor) mistakes in the past, and I have learned from this. The most recent new articles have all been well received.

One recent mistake, (while working on Artificial Intelligence) is that I noticed Natural Intelligence linked to a corporate entitity article. I thought this was deceiving, so I moved that to Natural Intelligence (company). I quickly created a placeholder in the newly empty Natural Intelligence, this was not well received (moved to draft). It was an exceptional reason for hastily adding content (not actually creating a new article), but I will be sure to follow the rule also under exceptional circumstances.--Bquast (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC) Bquast (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• UtherSRG (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Admin since 2004, created lots of articles. New creations do not appear to need patrolling. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Schwede66 21:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Malo95 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I create normally articles about international handball competitions which are notable. I have 3 deleted page (Not include moved page etc.) out of 178 pages which I created. Two of them were in my early days where I was not as informed about importance as today. It would reduce. work of other authors if I could have this right. Thank you very much. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mandsford (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Admin who held autopatrolled before becoming an admin, new creations do not appear to require patrolling. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mandsford, please note that references are not to be preceded by a space; all else seems fine. Schwede66 21:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Kingoflettuce (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I have created a handful of articles, so it's probably about time. Kingoflettuce (talk) 08:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Kingoflettuce (talk) 08:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Bridget (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Created over 50 articles, new creations do not appear to require attention from NPP.

Bridget technically already has autopatrolled as a global rollbacker, but I've been enforcing the consensus at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Archive 37#Autopatrol and global rollback by manually marking her articles as unreviewed. This request should be evaluated to the same standard as if she weren't a global rollbacker. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done DanCherek (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]