UtherSRG

You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"

What own words? What do mean?

• What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talk • contribs)

See here. Polygnotus (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I've blocked them. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

@UtherSRG: Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello UtherSRG,

I noticed that you were working on the film page Obara'M, which was deleted. I want to work on that same film page but I would also like to be aware of any issues this topic had in the past to avoid repeating the same thing.

I would really appreciate your help in understanding why this topic was previously deleted.

Thanks. Aivrie (talk) 19:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I deleted it as WP:CSD#G5. You may start it fresh. I suggest Draft:Obara'M. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, you just deleted the Draft:Reliance Global Corporate Security

It has been recreated by the same editor. Could you delete and protect.

Greetings from Los Angeles,  // Timothy :: talk  17:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Can and will. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi UtherSRG, might find my SPI complaint at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nittin Das relevant. Cheers, microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, just wondering what clerk action are you requesting there? I couldn't understand from just reading the case. Any clarification would be appreciated. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 15:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Looking for a CU between the two possible puppets. If neither are CBNB, perhaps they are themselves the same. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

That would be a CU request. As far as I know, clerk actions are usually for moving, merging, and splitting cases. From what I can see, Trace010 appears to be closer in connection to CBNB. Sword-Emperor-dev definitely appears fishy, but does not overlap with Trace010 and behaviorally aren't the same. (my bet is what Girth Summit said, another UPE editor picking up the same ticket for Akuma Saningong)

I'm going to close the case for SEd, then as I don't see further actions necessary. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 02:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

Thank you for the info on the reversion on human. I feel a bit too lazy to start a new debate on this on the talk page as it is outside the scope of my usual, more intensively focused topics. I can't help but be curious though: what was the compelling reason that its exclusion was deemed beneficial to the article, as there is nothing in the talk page about it (I checked beforehand). Kehkou (talk) 04:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I think the jist of the decision is that humans are essentially domesticated, and we don't list the status of for domesticated species; we are no longer "in the wild". - UtherSRG (talk) 10:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

The discussion has been archived. Near the top of the talk page is a set of archival links, as well as an archive search box. I believe found the relevant discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I appreciate your activity. But I created draft:Shwapnopuron which were brought under Afd. It was saying that WP:NORG failed. But from my point of view it does not violate the criteria of being notable in any way. An organization needs to be significant,

1) Reliable multiple sources

2) Independent

3) Secondery, In-depth and others

The article was created by maintaining all these criteria. This is evident by looking at the sources added to the references. Your last comment was to upgrade the issue of deletion discussion, where WP:NORG was lacking but this article meets all the criteria. All the sources are from prominent, reliable and national newspaper like Ittefaq, Jagonews24, Manab Zamin.... Please review the sources. Sulupa (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

The deletion discussion disagrees with you. Please find a way to address the issue. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

This article may be moved from draft to the main article and brought under a new Afd with previous issues. However there was no discussion in the previous Afd and it was soft deleted. Coming up, there may be discussion in Afd this time. Where the editors will judge the article. Sulupa (talk) 17:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Note my statement at WP:RFU when I restored it. It would immediately be eligible for deletion in main article space. If restored to article space, you run the risk of it being hard deleted. I'm giving you the opportunity to improve the article to prevent that. If you do not wish to improve the article, you can either let it sit in draft for someone else to improve, or you can move it into main article space. If you move it, I will nominate it for deletion. I urge you to seek assistance from the Teahouse in figuring out how to improve it. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)