Talk:1790 United States census
 | United States: Government Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
.svg)
Census Info
The census information from www.census.gov/population/documentation/twps0027/tab02.txt shows NYC as 33,131 and Philadelphia as 28,522.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.123.105.3 (talk)12:49, July 5, 2007 (UTC)
Blue links
They do not work. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Ranking
and greater Philidelphia was 4 square miles big and had 44,096 there was no greater new york area newyork had no suburbs adn only measured at best 2 miles big so rank NYC 2nd like it rightfully was
rank Philidelpih higher than Newyork city by including northern liberties and south wark "southern liberties" both of these towns were close to one mile big and also massachusetts had 51,202 people classified as urban in 1790 so mention that also —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.211.9.198 (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
The sort of "Totals" is not a numberical sort but is done on the leading digit. 71.126.36.121 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I would correct but I do not know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.36.121 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- I checked the table and it was working fine, sorting the content properly, numerically. It appears as if, in the course of the last five years, an anonymous hero has corrected this error for the page. CarlsonC (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1790 United States Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2020 United States Census which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Discrepancies
Before my one edit today, which changed only the Massachusetts figure in the "Total" column, there were the following discrepancies in the article's table of states and territories:
- Delaware: 59,094 is 2 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; this is explained in a footnote to the table.
- Massachusetts: 387,787 is 9,000 more than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
- New Hampshire: 141,801 is 84 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
- Vermont: 85,529 is 10 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
- National total: 3,964,905 is 32,176 more than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
President Lethe (talk) 22:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Norwalk 1790 census includes both stamford and greenwich, hence its inflated population.
If you check the source provided it shows data for 1790 with a large spike as those other towns are lumped in, before returning to its actual population of around 5000 seen in 1782 and in 1800. I suggest a note here since this distorts the importance of Norwalk in Connecticut at the time 87.210.242.77 (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Google Books vs. Archive.org
When an item is available from both locations, which should we link to? I accidentally duplicated the Virginia one at Archive.org. I like to saw logs! (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)