Talk:Ascribed status

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lbecmer2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Can religion be considered Ascribed on some level?Those born into particular religions. -- LogicX 19:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

while being born into a religion is asrcibed, the issue here is whether some religions have greater status than others. So, if your social rank is based on the religion into which you were born, yeah that's ascribed status, but unless real prestige is conferred.... Are you ruling class because of your religion? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.103.38.48 (talk) 05:01, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

I think that the section about the Caste system in India is lacking some information. It only existed because the bhramins messed with the Vedas and Puranas for their own gain. It is hard, but it is possible to seperate that from the rest of Hinduism.66.235.43.172 (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ascribed status. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100308100024/http://www.glencoe.com/catalog/index.php/program?c=1675&s=21309&p=4213&parent=4526 to http://www.glencoe.com/catalog/index.php/program?c=1675&s=21309&p=4213&parent=4526

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

All 2409:4042:2E9E:357B:B516:1363:9F01:C1DB (talk) 03:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)