Talk:COinS

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 185.190.132.3 in topic Conins
WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / Websites / CompSci Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

For Wikipedia's use of COinS, see COinS in Wikipedia

Latent vs static URL

Is the terminology "latent URL" as opposed to "static URL", or am I misunderstanding? — Omegatron 05:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

A latent URL is an "unactivated" OpenURL--one with no resolver. It shouldn't be used instead of static in that context, as I was trying to use "static URL" to refer to an OpenURL that has been bound to one particular resolver--an "activated" OpenURL. I don't know if there is better terminology for this.... --Karnesky 05:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I meant "is COinS a latent URL, as opposed to a static URL?" — Omegatron 00:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes. Originally, that was basically the only purpose--to provide a standardized latent OpenURL (and some earlier proposals involved less client-side processing to "activate" the URLs (not enclosed in spans, no need to split/separate/process tags--literally just the OpenURL CO without the URL to the resolver). With the processing & with other applications for COinS metadata (such as reference management), I don't know how much this should be stressed. It might be worth a mention. --Karnesky 01:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
It should certainly be explained. History, rationale, etc. — Omegatron 01:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Problems

We should mention the problems brought up by this post, though we need to put more neutral and "advantages" content first. — Omegatron 00:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

ContextObjects are a part of openurl

"The Context Object (“CO” in COinS) is the technical name for the part of an OpenURL that describes the item somebody wants to find." — Omegatron 05:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not use COinS anymore

Wikipedia seems to have removed COinS support, as of November 2012. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Citation/core#Removing_COINS_metadata -- 80.168.173.68 (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

This change is most likely temporary. Further, Wikipedia uses COinS on 'Cite this page', book sources, and other cases, e.g. [1] or Special:BookSources/978-1-880124-61-1. --Karnesky (talk) 13:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)`

Example needed

Some sample HTML demonstrating COinS would be very helpful. -- Beland (talk) 16:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Conins

100000 conins 185.190.132.3 (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)