Talk:Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film)

	Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 25, 2013 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 11, 2023.

Film: Comic book / Japanese / American

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Comic book films task force. This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Japan: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:08, May 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles

	Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ian F Whitman, Ikhan-rollins. Peer reviewers: Imartins34, Lkhk32, Zxmaria, Starlyia, Brandon Shortrede.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed merge of The Art of Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind into Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film)

Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Merge boldly performed due to no quorum. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The artbook is definitely toeing the line with regards to notability, and it seems like it would be permastub material either way. I think the content of the artbook article could easily find a home in a subsection of the film article, or possibly the article on the manga. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Lacking any comment in this discussion for almost a month, I'm going to go ahead and perform the merge. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

   Y Merger complete. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

About the reverts

Latest comment: 7 months ago8 comments2 people in discussion

 – —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey Chorake, thanks for your contributions to this article! Please make sure you understand the policy on self-published sources. Information from these kinds of sources are generally not reliable, and not eligible for citation on Wikipedia. I'd recommend that you read through the links in this message and the ones above, which will help you determine which sources are reliable. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I think three separate sources are fine to confirm what information is already present in the credits for the film proper. Chorake (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm not commenting on the number of sources but on their quality. Also, I'm going through your edit in more detail now, and I'm not sure the information you're adding needs to be in the article per WP:WEIGHT, which requires that balance be maintained in articles by including information included in reliable sources. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I think it's only fair that the people involved in the post-production should be acknowledged by name if the same amount of detail is to be extended to those involved with the second. Chorake (talk) 02:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Totally fine if you want to include that! I'm only saying that your additions need to be supported by sources that are secondary, independent, and reputably published, as described at WP:RS. Wikipedia isn't a reflection of editors' opinions, but a representation of information provided in reliable sources. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

All well and good. I don't want any misunderstanding between us, but as I'm sure you're aware for these kind of pedantic topics, it does take a little extra digging for reputable sources. Thank you for your patience. Chorake (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

@Chorake: Thanks for doing that; the Almanac and American copyright database sources appear to support your edits. I've removed the unreliable database which you reinstated, but I don't think that matters anymore since all of the information is already sourced. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)