Talk:Radon's theorem
Latest comment: 3 years ago by David Eppstein in topic Proof is formally incosistent
Proof is formally incosistent
and are defined as sets of points of . However, in it says and , indicating that contain a set of natural numbers. Shouldn't and be defined as a subset of and accordingly the desired partition as and . TheViking98868768763 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Easier fix is to replace etc by . —David Eppstein (talk) 16:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Now is not defined. doesn't make sense. TheViking98868768763 (talk) 19:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- It's defined at the start of the section, in the sentence " there exists a set of multipliers". One can reasonably expect readers to match the subscripts from the xi's to the ai's. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Now is not defined. doesn't make sense. TheViking98868768763 (talk) 19:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchIndian Premier LeagueWikipedia:Featured picturesPornhubUEFA Champions League2024 Indian Premier LeagueFallout (American TV series)Jontay PorterXXXTentacionAmar Singh ChamkilaFallout (series)Cloud seedingReal Madrid CFCleopatraRama NavamiRichard GaddDeaths in 2024Civil War (film)Shōgun (2024 miniseries)2024 Indian general electionJennifer PanO. J. SimpsonElla PurnellBaby ReindeerCaitlin ClarkLaverne CoxXXX (film series)Facebook2023–24 UEFA Champions LeagueYouTubeCandidates Tournament 2024InstagramList of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finalsJude BellinghamMichael Porter Jr.Andriy LuninCarlo AncelottiBade Miyan Chote Miyan (2024 film)