Talk:Sindhi language

I have noticed something which is that the examples for scripts script differ.

For example in the Arabic script it is written:
جنھن تي عربي ٻوليءَ جو بہ تمام وڏو اثر آهي
जंहिं ते अरबी बो॒लीअ जो बि तमामु वॾो असर आहे
“Jinhein te/ti arbi boli a jo be tmaam vdo asr ahe/ahi”*
“Which has a major influence on the Arabic language”**

Where the example in the Devanagari script:
जंहिन ते कुझ द्राविड़ी उहुञाण पण मौजूद आहिनि
جنھن تي ڪجه دراوڙي اھڃاڻ پڻ موجود آھن
“Jinhein te/ti kuj dravri uhyan pn mojod ahin”*
“Which also has some Dravidian features”**

I’m not sure what to make of it, but I would like other’s opinions on this as to what it should be changed to or if it needs to be changed at all.

“*”(transliteration might not be exact/precise as I don’t speak Sindhi)
“**”(using Google translate)
Taimoorahmed11 (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

The terms "Aurat", "Arvad", "Avret", and "Awrath" may refer to: Women of Asian religious or cultural descent and identity.

Self nomination for AFD since article copy pasted to Draft:Aurat for incubation because IMHO current article title Aurat (word) is misleading and confusing leading to western systemic bias and stifling the article growth. Please find Detail reason at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurat (word)

I invite project members to review current and potential sourcing and weigh in on the AfD discussion. Thanks!

Bookku (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello many greetings,

Requesting your proactive contribution and support in updating Draft:Aurats (word) in relation to the related languages you know well.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

A blocked user inserted this interesting table in the article but unfortunately I don't think it's citable. Aryaman^{A (talk, contribs)} 19:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

But why did you remove it? Even if there are no sources, what is the likelihood that someone made this up?

Sounds like a lot of effort to pull a prank, not how vandals usually behave. If anything you could have added the template ^{[citation needed]}. 178.120.60.253 (talk) 11:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, this table was used by me, and i used this table from a citation already mentioned, so I thought it was unnecessary to put a citation again, if you put it back, i can use the citation again. Thanks AngelicDevil29 (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)