- Frequently, some pages transcluding {{Admin dashboard}} are going on overflow and appear at Category:Pages_where_post-expand_include_size_is_exceeded.
This Template:Admin dashboard/light has been rewritten by including directly all the parts that were dispersed in so many sub-templates. - The "leaks out boxes" error has been fixed.
- Pages RFPP and UNFAA are simply linked (i.e. not transcluded) when too busy
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
Administrative backlog
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
- 160.202.36.185 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. No reverts, edits seem constructive, and last warning on talk page is over a year old. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 58.84.62.49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Thaniyavarthanam: Vandalizing other pages as well. Aadirulez8 (talk) 20:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. level 2 now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Loki Laufeyson causes mischief because he has an eating disorder (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. TLJ7863 (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 8 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 6 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Chanusmartz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Shiite Iranian (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SPAMMANER (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gimlifest (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TwentyFourSevenThreeSixtyFive (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- ADookie (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Just Some Butt Hole (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "(anal|butt|bum|ass+|arse|anus|azz+)[ -]*(sex|sec*k+s|sechs|bleeding|leakage|seepage|hole)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Socksunlimited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Featured article must get Lokification (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: 40chars. Violating string: pheatured article must get lokiphication" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Username exceeds 40 characters. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Ambproduction (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 19:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 20:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Secretlondon (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent unsourced credits changes. Waxworker (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:902:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and user vandalism. There are new id of Malhari91 as Ddpak. Ddpak doing same edits for removing the sourced content same like Malhari91 and 2409:40C0:20:3EFC:8000:0:0:0. They looks like same and one person. Shankrrao Thorat (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Awareness and its first-link loop
(Potentially)
- Mind (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Thought (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Consciousness (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High levels of IP disruption to Awareness, reordering links to "save" the philosophy effect despite consensus (see talk page) for the current link order. I recommend one-month temporary semi-protection to Awareness until IP editors realize such efforts are futile.
Saving the philosophy effect could disrupt Mind, Thought, and Consciousness, because editing those articles could save the philosophy effect. There already has been one such edit to Mind, although protecting the chain is not warranted right now. However, if such edits become pervasive, I would suggest one month temporary semi-protection. Closetside (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Full protection. As soon as the protection expired, edit warring started again (changing the infobox away from the RfC consensus version). Or alternatively please just block the one edit warring editor. Number 57 22:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Block: User Semsûrî keeps on reverting edits and claiming that the map and Anthem should be sourced (they're very clear and don't need to be sourced)....... . Kirkukturk3 (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- See editor's talk page. 20:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: remove protection for this page Wikipedia:Requests for page protection173.72.3.91 (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection was put up to stop a sockpuppet account from edit and it's been 15 years and i haven't seen any of that happening. User1432532758 (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection: Whitelock was added 7 years ago for disruptive editing, and there no longer is as much disruptive editing. For the article of an important American city, it's probably better not to whitelock. Josethewikier (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: I'm not against a goldlock protection and I can understand arbcom's decision, however it would be ideal if the protection is temporary (even if it's 4 years or something like that); if that fails immediately, then should we consider a definitive goldlock protection. Josethewikier (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
