Template talk:Single-purpose account

I read this and found no explanation of why a single-purpose account (SPA) is a bad thing.

The only information I saw on whether a SPA is a bad/good thing is their apparently typicaluse in sock puppetry.

Is it deemed problematic for a user to have an account they only use for some edits?If so, why?

Could someone provide some additional explanation?

2601:1C1:C180:4F40:5C4A:BE6D:F0D9:20B5 (talk) 04:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

This is typical template documentation and it just describes how to use the template. The background is at WP:SPA which might be included under "see also". Johnuniq (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! (I have forgotten how to tag Johnuniq.)

2601:1C1:C180:4F40:0:0:0:452D (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Add "subst:" to the sample template at the top of the page so that it displays a proper example rather than an error message. QuietHere (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: or actually "already done" – there is an initial {{safesubst: that is enclosed in <includeonly> tags that, if removed, will show a barebones example template as rendered in [my sandbox]. Editors thought it best to show examples in the template documentation, and to readily show other editors who come to this page the exact error they will see if they forget to substitute this template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 18:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Okay, that logic makes sense to me. Looks a bit silly but that's no big deal. Thanks for explaining! QuietHere (talk) 18:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

my pleasure! Paine  19:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)