User:Lunahom/sandbox

Ecotourism is the idea of responsible trips and travel to areas that might be protected and especially fragile. The intent is to create as little detrimental impact on the environment as possible. South Africa has used ecotourism to sustain and improve its immense biodiversity, as well as invigorate its economy. Tourism is the fourth largest generator of foreign exchange in South Africa^[1], and ecotourism is the idea of encouraging visitors while promoting and supporting a country's biodiversity. South Africa contains a lot of biodiversity, and so ecotourism is a way for the country to benefit from wildlife in a non-consumptive and legal manner as opposed to illegal activities like poaching and trafficking for the international wildlife trade.

The first real mention of 'green' or 'eco-tourism' on a world-wide stage was in the Agenda 21 for the Travel and Tourism Industry, published in 1997 by the World Tourism Organization. ^[2]After the fall of the apartheid state and South Africa's first democratic election in 1994, the Constitution of South Africa, and later the 1997 white Paper on South African Land Policy attempted to address the racial imbalance in land ownership in the country. People who had previously been forcibly pushed off of their land were allowed to reclaim land in its stead. This new land had significant touristic potential.^[1]

In 1996, the South African Government's Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism created a plan to develop and manage the tourism industry in a responsible and sustainable manner, "key elements" of its strategy were identified as:

• "assessment of environmental, social, and economic impacts of tourism developments;
• monitoring of tourism impacts with open disclosure of information;
• involvement of local communities in planning and decision making;
• ensuring the involvement of communities who benefit from tourism;
• maintenance and encouragement of natural, economic, social and cultural diversity;
• sustainable use of local resources;
• avoidance of waste and over-consumption."^[3]

This program, dubbed Tourism in GEAR, emphasized that tourism in the country should be led by the government, powered by the private sector, centered on community, and labour conscious.

Despite the creation of this plan, the South African government has had trouble developing systems of regulation. Some initiatives have been developed but with little follow through. Some private sector tourism companies seek international certification by organizations like Green Globe 21 or Iso 14001-based programs, but not many do this. ^[3]

Ecotourism can be used to ensure those local to the area are involved in the experience, and are benefitting from the economic growth that comes with revenue generated. In traditional tourism models, most of the money in package tours will go to airlines, hotels, and other international countries. But with an eco hotel created for ecotourism purposes, they are more likely to hire and purchase locally thus, putting more money back into the local economy.

On the other side, ecotourism developments are frequently financed by foreign investors who are likely seeking untapped markets. There is a sense that ecotourism further commodities natural resources, and reserves.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).South Africa's unique geography allows the country to support such a diverse population of plants and animals. It is important to protect biodiversity in South Africa because people still rely on natural resources for food and medicine. Plants and flowers are widely used as traditional forms of medicine and treatment for common ailments. The Western Cape of South Africa has 8,000 plant species and 7 out of 10 of them exist nowhere else on earth.^[4] Some of these plants are currently being researched for treatment of HIV patients.^[5]

Protecting the biodiversity of South Africa is important for maintaining the integrity of the ecosystems, and also protecting the health and wellbeing of South African people. Eco-tourism ecotourism has the capacity to promote conservation of biodiversity, and also has the capacity for disruption of wildlife and damage to the environment. The nature of these impacts varies according to the type of ecotourism activities and how the tourism operators meet the tourists’ expectations.^[6]

Some critics say that the potential benefits of ecotourism might be limited by the limited viewing preferences among tourists to protected nature reserves, suggesting that most tourists are primarily interested in seeing charismatic mega-fauna usually confined to government or privately-owned parks. 'Fan favorites' in South Africa are the most popular species, particularly among first-time and overseas visitors, but African visitors and experienced wildlife viewers were more interested in bird and plant diversity, scenery, and rarer, less easily-observed and/or less high-profile mammals.^[7] Many of the species that were most favored by ecotourists in South African are endangered/extinction prone and thus often absent from wildlife areas due to sensitivity to human encroachment and competition with more abundant species. Hence, ecotourism may provide incentives for the conservation of intact guilds, and management for ecotourism may align more closely with biodiversity conservation.^[7]

For some endangered species, but not all, ecotourism can extend expected survival time, but calculation outcomes vary depending on population parameters and starting sizes, predation, and ecotourism scale and mechanisms. However, tourism does not currently compensate over other major conservation threats associated with natural resource extractive industries.^[8]

Collaborative partnerships are what guide, or should guide any ecotourism efforts. Studies suggest that participation in ecotourism brings mixed results on biodiversity conservation and community livelihoods due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders in the design, planning, and implementation of ecotourism projects.^[9]

Dr. Shaffer comments:

I look forward to more. This is a great start. With your last two sections you have some opportunities to connect your written material to larger discussions of African conservation and wildlife trafficking and trade in a comparative way that could be linked to other parts of wikipedia.

I've chosen to evaluate "Species affected by poaching"^[10]

• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

I'd say most everything in the article is relevant. The authors included some larger context/history related to poaching in the different regions, but not anything excessive. Nothing that I found distracting.

• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is neutral! They give examples and specific numbers of poaching, and then provide fact checking to those reports. Such as when they're talking about the "300 African elephants in Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe" reported poached. They explain that these numbers were exaggerated, and provide relevant citations.

• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I think the article does side with the idea that poaching might be a problem/bad thing/doesn't represent the opposition position.

• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?All the links that I tried worked, however some articles didn't seem to be easily accessible to the public. Many of them are coming from public sources (government reports) and while they could have incorrect information (if a government wants to hide the fact that poaching is a problem???) I think for the most part they are reliable sources.

• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

The section on South-East Asia is a stub (can that term be used here?). It definitely needs to be fleshed out.

• Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

From what I can tell there is a lot of consistent editing and updating going on behind the scenes. I saw multiple "dead link updates"

• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

The article is a lot of numbers, and not a lot of analysis which makes sense because in class we're more likely to talk about how or why things happen, but wikipedia articles should be dedicated to presenting the events.