User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 53

Hi Ealdgyth. Now it's over, while we're waiting for the results I can now expand on some of the thoughts I expressed during the campaign. Whether you supported or opposed my candidacy is of course entirely up to you - important is that you participated in the process. I would just like to put two concerns of yours in perspective. 1) As far as I know there is no anti admin cabal, I have never said there was.if there is, it exist outside Wikipedia. I have always referred to an anti-admin 'brigade' and have constantly taken great care to mention that it is not a cohesive or organised group. It is a clearly identifiable archetype of editor who vehemently expresses extreme negative opinions about admins and does not refrain from making personal attacks, including lies in order to disparage them. They do not act in concert. 2) If one looks very closely, one will see that the questioners got the answers they deserve; there is no need to kowtow to them to get their vote. Whether or not I am offered a seat on the Committee is immaterial - I'm not sure I ever wanted to stand in the first place. If I am elected, I will concern myself with the day-to-day work of the Committee. If not, I will seek to bring about reforms of the electoral process, mainly focusing on the need for questions and voter guides to be at least objective and kept free of gender related and other socio-political barnstorming. I will be looking to you for support, and once again, thank you for taking part in this year's ACE. Regards, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm not clear about the last bits of your message - did you think my voter's guide was less objective than others? I will admit, voter's guides are opinions, but I do strive to at least base my opinions on concrete examples or other information rather than just gut feelings. (If I'd gone on gut feelings, I'd have supported two candidates instead of the five I did (acutally, it was six, but Timtrent withdrew). Also - I'm not sure why you are going to be looking to me to support ... something. I generally don't involve myself too much in the whole backstage stuff on Wikipedia. ArbCom elections are just about the only time I stick my head out of my content shell. I'm certainly not going to commit to supporting something that isn't yet laid out as to the exact proposals/etc. I'd like to also point out that my guide is pretty much focused on suitability for arbcom - there are folks (like myself) who just aren't suited for the role but that doesn't mean they aren't great folks. An example - Rich Farmborough - he's a great editor, does much needed work around the wiki, and I'm sure is a fine person in person also. I opposed him not because I think he's "bad" but because I don't see him as suited for arbcom. I admired your refusing to answer the signnpost's rather badly worked out "survey" - and I have no problems with you championing causes (I happen to disagree that it's a problem, but that's probably my non-admin status speaking). My point on your answers wasn't that you needed to kowtow to the questioners - it was that your answers did not give me the impression that your temperament was suited for arbcom in my opinion. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Actually, my message didn't require a reply - I thanked everyone who wrote a guide. And as I said, I'm not in the slightest bit concerned whether I get elected or not, 'competitions' are not really my scene but this is the only way the Arbcom can be perpetuated. At the end of the day the seats will all be filled anyway, and as someone once said, we get the committee we deserve, not the one we need. I voted for nine of the best of the bunch but in reality there is only one who I think is really suited for the task (and they are certain to be elected). And that's where a possible reform might help, and where those who write voter guides might like to support any future proposals for improvement of the system. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diuma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C.. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Anyone have access to this article in the Journal of Ecclesiastical History? Ealdgyth - Talk 15:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Or this in Theatre Survey ? Ealdgyth - Talk 15:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

And in Nottingham Medieval Studies Ealdgyth - Talk 15:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Nottingham Medieval Studies or Northern History. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Regarding that last one, I'd recommend asking at WP:MERSEY and WP:GM, as I'd be shocked if the Manchester and Liverpool universities don't have access and there's bound to be someone there with an academic account. Boing! said Zebedee immediately springs to mind as someone who'll either have access himself, or know someone who does. I know any association with the NW England projects will immediately get you tainted as a cats-paw of the conspiracy, but given that I can see Peter Damian on your talkpage I'm sure you can cope with Jimbo's cronies lumping you in with the Toxic Personalities. ‑ Iridescent 17:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I know someone who might have access to the Northern History article via Lancaster Uni, but he's been flooded out and can't get into campus - I'll ask him and get back to you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I have emailed you the Northern and Nottingham articles. Any problems please advise. I can copy to Ecclesiastical one next time I go to the library but I don't know when that will be. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Dudley. They came through fine. And there isn't any great hurry ... the subjects of the articles will still be dead when I get back to them...

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
22		Æthelweard (historian) (talk)						Add sources
8		John Potter (bishop) (talk)						Add sources
15		John Sumner (bishop) (talk)						Add sources
722		Mercia (talk)						Add sources
1,077		Quetzalcoatl (talk)						Add sources
75		Robert Runcie (talk)						Add sources
25		Tritheism (talk)						Cleanup
1,013		Normans (talk)						Cleanup
69		Saint Mungo (talk)						Cleanup
18		Religious image (talk)						Expand
179		History of the Church of England (talk)						Expand
7		Lullus (talk)						Expand
2		Correctory (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
655		Pope Pius XII (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
24		Clifford Truesdell (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2		Ignorantia sacerdotum (talk)						Merge
163		Lawrence of Rome (talk)						Merge
10		Diocese of St Asaph (talk)						Merge
449		Book of Common Prayer (talk)						Wikify
705		Edward the Elder (talk)						Wikify
1,066		King James Version (talk)						Wikify
0		Andrei Moiseyenkov (talk)						Orphan
0		Apex Community Park (talk)						Orphan
1		Archie Kemp (talk)						Orphan
7		Richard FitzJames (talk)						Stub
6		Dean of Arches (talk)						Stub
4		Richard Osbaldeston (talk)						Stub
11		Matthew Hutton (archbishop of Canterbury) (talk)						Stub
11		John Fordham (bishop) (talk)						Stub
5		John Barnet (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chad of Mercia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | title = [[Bishop of York]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monroe Edwards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bond and Natchez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm aware that several people with access to various journals watch this page, so I thought I might ask here if anyone could email me this article. I'm currently waiting for a GA review on another article I was working on, so in the meantime I thought I might try to improve the Battle of the Winwaed article. (Much of it is unsourced.) Thanks. Biblioworm 00:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

If anyone sends it to Biblioworm, I'd not turn it down either... Ealdgyth - Talk 02:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@Biblioworm: Can you send me an email? Ealdgyth, you have some. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

I sent the email. Biblioworm 16:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ealdgyth. User:Corinne did this TFA summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC (and a bang-up job, too). You can use the page history to get a diff comparing it to the lead section of the article; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 02:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Precious again, your Robert de Chesney, "definitely a mover and shaker in his time period"!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

	Seasons Greetings
	Christmas! Christmas, everywhere, on every talk page, I do dispair Seasons being greeted and Wikibreaks told, but still time for a little more editing, for being WP:BOLD! So go on, go forth and enjoy beyond concern Your Wiki will be waiting for when you return. Buster Seven Talk 20:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This card was designed by User:Samtar I also live in Central Illinois...near Varna. B7

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Ealdgyth: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Because you despise talk page templates. Anyway, enjoy the holidays! Esquivalience ^t 00:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Warmest Wishes for Health, Wealth and Wisdom through the Holidays and the Coming Year! Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 12:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
9		Adam Orleton (talk)						Add sources
42		Gasteracantha cancriformis (talk)						Add sources
10		John White (bishop) (talk)						Add sources
850		Fawlty Towers (talk)						Add sources
15		Charles Gore (talk)						Add sources
172		Winchester Cathedral (talk)						Add sources
211		Edgar the Peaceful (talk)						Cleanup
846		James Monroe (talk)						Cleanup
4		Robert Gregory (priest) (talk)						Cleanup
569		Dessert (talk)						Expand
31		George Bell (bishop) (talk)						Expand
2,043		New Orleans (talk)						Expand
76		Basil Fawlty (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
292		Super Bowl XVIII (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
219		Lord Randolph Churchill (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
226		Viking expansion (talk)						Merge
323		Surety bond (talk)						Merge
345		Simony (talk)						Merge
13		Thomas Denman, 1st Baron Denman (talk)						Wikify
129		Rouen Cathedral (talk)						Wikify
2		Dario di Giovanni (talk)						Wikify
2		4-Iodopropofol (talk)						Orphan
1		Association Sonneurs de Veuzes (talk)						Orphan
3		Alsetex 410 (talk)						Orphan
3		William Wilson Cash (talk)						Stub
10		Gay Island (talk)						Stub
4		Ernest Pearce (talk)						Stub
10		Maurice (bishop of London) (talk)						Stub
4		Mervyn Charles-Edwards (talk)						Stub
6		Thomas Polton (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Ealdgyth,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 11:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Bishops Hunberght and Humbertus have the same name and both are Humberht in PASE. I think their titles should reflect the fact that they have the same name. Any opinion? Srnec (talk)

Well, Hunberght is Hunberht in the Handbook of British Chronology (3rd ed). Humbertus is also Hunberht in the HBC - just to make things more fun. Probably go with "bishop of XXX" as a disambig? Ealdgyth - Talk 21:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan de Neville (landholder), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Young. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ealdgyth, sorry I reverted your edits on Richard Basset but your actions were unreasonable on the following counts:-

• To contain long paragraphs is bad writing and breaking them up is good re wikis style guide. It is standard to list the issue in biographies as a bullet list. Your reversion of this seems malicious; why are you are not undoing the bullet lists on all of the other biographies?
• References can be inaccurate. Having two increases the verifability of something. It is pointless removing any above the count of one.
• Just because a book is relatively old doesn't mean it is not a useful source of information. Some of the most comprehensive county histories are 200+ years old. Yes they contain mistakes (as do new books) but they often contain references to hard to access latin documents which are invaluable to someone that really wants to research. Can you provide proof of the accuracy of the more recent refs on the page?

You would have more time on your hands to actually write stuff if you didn't change everything that isn't done precisely the way you want it. Wiki's main problem is lack of content and lack of references. You would better use your time by adding to wiki, rather than endlessly editing. Sliven2000 (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

This should be discussed (minus the last sentence which quite honestly is utterly uncalled for) on the article talk page, where I already started a discussion. Kindly strike the last sentence as a comment on the editor and not the content. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

You'll go mad! Best of luck, but whoooah! Myself, more and more, I concentrate on improving poor but highly-viewed existing articles, which as you know are legion, at a fairly gentle pace. The Wikipedia:Take the lead! January contest seems a good idea too. Johnbod (talk) 03:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

I have a huge list of redlinks that need filling in - partly missing articles from the DNB and partly things I've redlinked along the way. I'll keep working on improving other articles too - but there are still a large number of missing articles in the medieval area. I've got Harold Godwinson, Thomas Becket, and a few other articles on my radar for this year ... but there is a lot of reading involved with those. It's fun to dig and find out stuff about notable but obscure folks too. I'm also working on some themes - John's evil counselors, Becket's clerks, Becket's murderers, and maybe Companions of William I of England. We'll see. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Can anyone see a worthy DYK in Halenald de Bidun? I'm utterly failing at this one... Ealdgyth - Talk 21:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Well...not really. Not at all, actually... Biblioworm 23:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, normally I can find something but ... not this time. Oh, well. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Becoming a monk? Odd children's names? Johnbod (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, just how many of the Norman invaders were in fact Bretons? - I have no idea of course, but it struck me as a curious anomaly. You could do an {{ill}} to Pays de Dol [fr], btw; there isn't much to link to at Vildé-Bidon. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, his dates make it clear he didn't participate in the Conquest... he lived into Henry II's reign. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Go for the quirky slot: *DYK... that no one is certain if the second wife of Halenald de Bidun was his second wife? Montanabw^(talk) 16:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Nice idea. Except, no doubt, some people are indeed certain. --Dweller (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

He's just a very very boring guy. Guess he'll live without a DYK! Ealdgyth - Talk 16:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Did you know that Halenald de Bidun was such a minor character in history that a bunch of experienced Wikipedians couldn't even meet the rather low bar for finding a decent DYK hook about him? --Dweller (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Good one! Biblioworm 17:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

How about "Halenald de Bidun died a monk at St Andrews Priory, despite marrying twice and having at least seven children?" Hchc2009 (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

And also a complicated one. I just couldn't follow that paragraph about his wives and all his children. Biblioworm 17:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Halenald probably felt similarly...! Hchc2009 (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

I know I did. It's not much fun when authorities differ on things...and then you have to explain how and why they do. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alan de Neville (forester)

added a link pointing to Market

William Ketel

added a link pointing to John Leland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Best to you. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)