Joeyramoney

Hahahah. "Ass-burger." Haha. That's hilarious, dude! You must be some sort of comedic genius, or something! Where on earth do you get such edgy material?!?!

Hello, you left this message on my user page:

you are not upholding wikipedia policy, you are a common vandal. i realize that you are very offended by people opposing the EU. But what i can't understand is why you think that someone crossing out an EU flag on their page is obscene. this is in no way an insult to the people of europe, it is simply a statement against the organization. i heavily doubt that anyone is at all offended by it other than you, and crossing out the us flag honestly does not bother me, even though i would actually have some vague reason for it, as the US flag represents a people, not an organization. for the love of God, leave us all alone. you will not change anything. -Joeyramoney 17:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Someone answered to it:

I'm offended by people mangling the European flag. A flag is a flag, you can't claim that the EU one is less important because it "represents an organisation, not a people". It represents the people of Europe. If you think it wrong for someone to deface the American flag, then it is equally wrong to deface the European flag. Rusty2005 13:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

no, it really doesn't represent anyone. most europeans would not give the slightest shit about that flag. just take my word for it. Joeyramoney 23:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to respond and thank you for choosing to represent your opinion now without crossing out the EU flag. I am not "very offended" by people opposing the EU, I just think that more respect would be nice. I would never cross out a flag because I know people get offended by these things and I think there are many easy ways to express legitimate concerns avoiding unnecessary bad feelings. I am concerned about some aspects of the EU as well, e.g. the agricultural subsidies and the antidumping cases the EU and US use to disrupt the message of free trade they are proclaiming themselves. I however acknowledge that the EU has enormous achievements in allowing a continent to prosper that was previously very diverse in economic development and civil liberties. I already did change something as several users saw my point and chose not to use the crossed out flag any longer. Have a good time here. ROGNNTUDJUU! 23:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

um, no, it's still crossed. you are the only one bothered. no one is represented by this flag. I'll cross flags as i like. you are annoying. kthnxbye.-Joeyramoney 23:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

What specifically is your opposition RE the European Union? id be interested to read your views. thanks eski Boi 17 year old UK

somehow stumbled upon your page via User:Karmafist, who now appears to be singing the tune of a reformed abusive ex-admin. i don't trust him, but he cited bad treatment of you as a case study. (i was once the victim of Karmafist.) there are some good personalities here and some bad (at least one has visted your usertalk page, but i'll leave him unnamed). i like your politics/philosophy as depicted by your userboxes. live long and prosper. Rbj 08:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

ewwww lol Joeyramoney 22:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:13-playtime-big.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

what timezone is the main page displaying? according to my watch, it is only the 3rd.Joeyramoney 02:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

It displays UTC, which is currently on April 4. joturner 02:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Do you disapprove of the use of CE? You didn't give a reason. Zora 22:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

i hate "CE" and there was no real reason for it. it's well established throughout the article what time period this is.

It doesn't matter that you hate it, not everyone in the world is Christian. --Khoikhoi 23:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

you know exactly when muhammed lived, and so does pretty much evryone else. you don't have to tell people that the pilgrims landed in 1620 AD, it's implied if there's no suffix. anyway, isn't it more politically correct not to have anything at all? i'm sure that "CE" really annoys a lot of people. be more sensitive. Joeyramoney 23:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Old conversation, but I thought I should weigh in here to clear up some misconceptions; for one, the Manual of Style disagrees with you. Conventions like British vs. American English and CE vs. AD should be based on the original editor's style to avoid revert wars of people converting to the format of their preference. The only exception is in articles for which one style should obviously be preferred (such as United Kingdom or Christianity), where the preferred style should always be used no matter what style was used by the original editor. —Cuiviénen (talk•contribs), Saturday, 13 May 2006 @ 01:53 UTC

amazing how politically correct has become a slur. --Jewish Mayflower descendant 00:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi Joeyramoney,
I didn't actually mean to call them "funnel clouds" in the scientific sense (I didn't know it even existed) it was just my description of the way the clouds looked to me. --Fir0002 www 08:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I saw that you complained that no one was blocking an anonymous IP which kept vandalizing Platteville, Wisconsin. This is most likely due to the fact that the vandalism was getting automatically reverted by a bot, no administrator noticed it, and no one mentioned it to an admin. If you notice something like this happenening, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or, even better, post it onWP:AIV. (Oh, and I've blocked the guy for a week now.) Cheers --BaronLarf 16:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Any reason you deleted this talk page? Bruxism 07:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Don't do this. Everything in Wikipedia needs to follow our Wikipedia:Verifiability policy. Thanks for understanding. Jkelly 20:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

they seemed really unnecesary, as any brief glance at the lyrics rather explicitly illustrates the theme. it's not just one interpretation. same for the second quote, i realize that most wikipedians think that every single word of sentence must have a link, but it really just is quite evidently a delicate ballad, and is obviously pretty enduring if it has a paragraph on it, which is far more than most ramones songs ever get on here. if your case of wiki-paranoia is so insatiable as to warrant me, somneone who knows far more about this than you, to find a website that reflects the exact wording used in the article, fine. go bother someone else in the future. Joeyramoney 20:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Civility. Jkelly 20:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ugggggntitled-1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Are you saying that the Esquire should hold the distinction of being the first mass produced solidbody electric guitar? My sources say that the pre-Broadcaster/Telecaster Esquires were not produced in significant numbers--perhaps about 50. They didn't really get into mass production until the introduction of the 2-pickup Broadcaster (with the truss rod). Rohirok 23:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

perhaps you should consider fucking off...

Hi there

there's power in numbers. Lonecanine

Don't tell me how to write articles. When you can use proper grammar you stupid prick, then you can be the judge. Until then you can shut your punk ass up. User: Transkar

User talk:Transkar

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jkelly 02:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

it was on content. did you even read the article in question? it pisses me off when ickle newbies make a mess and expect others to clean it up. Joeyramoney 03:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I replied to you here. ~leif ☺ _(talk) 03:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I read it on here [1]--Daisy-berkowitz 22:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

I am still very queasy about using half the article to quote another site. --Fantailfan 00:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Stagger Lee on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. JD[^talk|_email] 18:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, my apologies. It would appear I've reverted back to vandalism again... Sorry. --JD[^talk|_email] 19:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

sarite. :) Joeyramoney 19:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

excuse me? i removed the blurb about a list of recordings because no such list exists. sorry if i should have discussed this first (although no one has added anything to that heading in the several months that it has been there), but that was not vandalism. Joeyramoney 19:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance on the Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos article, but could you clarify what was wrong with the wording? I don't see anything wrong with my phrasing. Daniel Olsen 03:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

At the risk of catching hell from the WP:NPA police, your question at Talk:Abortion was moronic. You'd be better off researching that kind of thing on your own before asking such an ignorant question. If it weren't for your age, you'd come off as some kind of racist troll instaed of a plain old idiot. --Elliskev 23:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Cross posted to User talk:Elliskev.

I concur that his comment on Talk:Abortion was a little bit too sensitive, and not necessarily the most productive way to handle that situation. That said, your post above is most assuredly a personal attack, and you are now being warned to cease and desist. I am especially not impressed that you posted this far more serious assault on Joey's user talk page, where it would presumably attract less attention than on the article talk page. I see from your talk page you have been warned before; take this one to heart and try to be more civil in your dealings with others. And one final note; age is completely irrelevent. One of the admins I most respect is 16 (15 when he made admin) and one of the trolls I block on sight is over 50. Maturity, not age, is the focus. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:30, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Joeyramoney, please accept my apologies for my uncivil comments. Calling another editor an idiot is not constructive. It's not nice. --Elliskev 13:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

This post[2] is completely unacceptable. Refrain from personally attacking others. "absolute douchebag" is beyond the threshold of tolerance, and I seriously considered blocking you immediately for that. This is your one heads-up: if you want to engage in exchanging insults and flame wars, Wikipedia is NOT the place. Find somewhere else. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

you read his response to me and what he has said to others. i'm sorry if that was out of line, but i'm not the problem here. Joeyramoney 16:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

When I post to him, I'll talk about what he did. I'm posting to you, and I'm talking about what you did. Is this somehow unclear? You are responsible for your posts. I don't care if he called you every name in the book, deleted your posts, and forged your signature. (If he did those things, report him of course.) Do not make personal attacks regardlss of what the target of your personal attacks may or may not have done. Two wrongs do not make it ok; they make you both in the wrong. KillerChihuahua^?!? 18:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Next time, just say you withdraw and someone will close it out. Someone might get the wrong impression. SynergeticMaggot 00:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Joeyramoney,

You might be interested in looking at User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Religion, User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Beliefs, and User:GRBerry/Userbox migration before you start worrying about the POV police too much. Rfrisbie^talk 12:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

You wrote, "why did you remove the image from this article without explanation? i don't see how it doesn't belong. Joeyramoney 05:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)"

Hi. The fair-use rationale for that particular cover states that it can only be used to signify the album in question. So it's fine for the Ramones (album) article, but not okay for the Ramones (group) article. =] Feel free to find another, fair-use, promotional, or free-use image for the article, and I'll gladly assist you with adding it to the page. --DieHard2k5 | Talk 15:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The image was up for deletion over copyright concerns. I assumed good faith and assumed you were the original creator (translator) and acted accordingly.

The only real copyright issue I see is that the spanish version is released under GNU which is incompatible with PD license you used. Nothing too serious, but wont hurt to address it either.

Furthermore, it would be nice to know what data the map is based on. I was wondering if you could inquire this with the spanish guy who created the original image.

--Cat out 01:52, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The image needs an update, Brazil's color is wrong.

As I am a complete newbie on Wikipedia, I couldn't update it myself, though I tried...

Could you update it for me? Or teach me how to do it?

ViniciusBrazil (talk) 01:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)ViniciusBrazil

Ok, the official lyrics are fight like a bomber, not fight like a farmer like you or whoever keeps changing it back to. Stop it. You're adding inaccurate information to a song that has one of the best guitar solos ever.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. -- AuburnPilot^talk 03:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[3]

... should I ask?

I admire your honesty, though. - Che Nuevara 03:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize image talk pages. You should know better. Rklawton 04:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Either your account is being used by someone else, or you have decided to start vandalizing. Please clarify. I have blocked this account to protect it. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 05:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I see you are editing again. Can you please clarify what happened before I blocked you? Was your account used by someone else, or did you decide to vandalize a bit? HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 18:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

i keep myself logged in all the time, so my little brother (or someone) must have been massing around. sorry 'bout that, Joeyramoney 20:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok, but you are responsible for your account, so perhaps you should stay logged out after use, or lock your door, or lock your computer. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 21:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

You may wish to check this article.--Taxwoman 15:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Snowbeltmap.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making comments like this one. This can be seen as trolling the article's contributors and is generally incivil. Thanks. Leebo⁸⁶ 14:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hol7008a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

hey, like ur pic ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 18:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

You are a really lousy person. Please do everyone a favor and leave Wikipedia. We don't want you around! --84.249.199.74 (talk) 22:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Image:Snowbelt.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Snowbelt.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JaGa^talk 02:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Category:Template:User Pinhead, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:User Pinhead has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kumioko (talk) 01:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:6 western floral.jpg, which you've attributed to Copied from eBay. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:6 western floral.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:02, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The article Beat on the Brat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CrowzRSA 23:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The file File:Snowbeltmap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)