User talk:Muboshgu/Archive 28

--331dot (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		For creating Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, October 2015, Wikipedia's first article about a Speaker of the House election. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Good work on this article. Do you have any interest on topics related to the 2016 United States federal budget? Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 is a DYK waiting to happen. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 22:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I may have to work on those. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
5		Warrior stadium (talk)						Add sources
100		Chris Sale (talk)						Add sources
5		Baseball Prospectus Internet Baseball Awards (talk)						Add sources
169		Discount store (talk)						Add sources
6,939		South Africa (talk)						Add sources
402		Nippon Professional Baseball (talk)						Add sources
37		Kompakt (talk)						Cleanup
446		Jason Chaffetz (talk)						Cleanup
9		Obstructing government administration (talk)						Cleanup
960		The Transporter Refueled (talk)						Expand
14		Thank God You're Here (U.S. TV series) (talk)						Expand
2,346		Guantanamo Bay detention camp (talk)						Expand
16		El Paso Diablos (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
357		Tim Lincecum (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
600		Susan Rice (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
8		United States House Select Investigative Panel on Planned Parenthood (talk)						Merge
206		Freight transport (talk)						Merge
36		German-American Steuben Parade (talk)						Merge
136		Kris Medlen (talk)						Wikify
2,148		Hilary Duff (talk)						Wikify
22		Larry Langford (talk)						Wikify
12		National Nothing Day (talk)						Orphan
4		Castronovo Chocolate (talk)						Orphan
4		Kevin P. Coughlin (talk)						Orphan
81		Terrance Gore (talk)						Stub
17		Conan (band) (talk)						Stub
17		Michael Taylor (baseball, born 1991) (talk)						Stub
22		Orlando Calixte (talk)						Stub
4		1954 Nippon Professional Baseball season (talk)						Stub
19		Lane Adams (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Allison Ball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 09:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, my name is Zach and I'm a reporter for National Journal. I'm writing a story on political wikipedia editors and I'd love to talk to you for it. If you're interested, shoot me an email at zmontellaro(at)nationaljournal.com. I'm also happy to answer any questions you have! Zach NJ (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

This reporter has canvassed a dozen other editors. One might ask, What's The Story? Buster Seven Talk 21:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ken Vining

added a link pointing to Roberto Hernández

Mike Caruso

added a link pointing to Roberto Hernández

United States House Select Investigative Panel on Planned Parenthood

added a link pointing to Washington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

• Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
• Cas Liber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
• West Virginian (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
• Calvin999 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• Rationalobserver (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• Harrias (submissions) wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.
• Rodw (submissions) wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Why do you keep changing darrelle revis siblings has a brother and sister on his father side do your research Stenuff1986 (talk) 07:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The NYT reference confirms 3 children; Darelle and his two siblings. Buster Seven Talk 15:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

That's a Pro Bowl response right there, Buster7. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I have begun a discussion at the help desk on a possible related situation. I think the thread is ..."Preventing an edit war." Buster Seven Talk 19:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic UFC 193. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! George Ho (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Greetings,

Re: waiting for consensus on the Content added to the Eagles of Death Metal:

There has not been any discussion on this topic all day, so I've added a note to the talk page and asked if this discussion is, in fact, completed and we've reached consensus, and then invited comments.

If no one objects in the next few hours, I'll restore the removed content and (probably) add at least another source (a New York Times article). If you have any objections or suggestions, please feel free to communicate either via my talk page or on the article's talk page.

Also, I just want to say that one of your 'check-in comment dialogs' with another editor -- in which he writes to your 'In the name of Jesus Christ ....' and your response containing 'I'm Jewish' is one of the funniest exchanges I've seen in awhile. Thank you very much for that.

All the best.

--Ron

Ronreisman (talk) 08:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

I haven't weighed in on the BDS-related info yet, in part because I'm not firmly decided. I do believe that the content I removed is inappropriate, and I'm glad it got a laugh. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello.

When I'm reverted twice, I don't appreciate very much to be accused of edit warring. I explained that birth control activism was already stated in the resume, and that she taught also as a nurse, but she was also famous for her columns, as it is stated in the text. So I don't feel your reverts were appropriated. But don't worry, I give up. --La femme de menage (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

I was simply letting you know about the sanction on that article in case you did not know. I simply agree with the other editor. If you want to further discuss this issue, we can do that on the article's talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Does it means that if an other editor agrees with me, he or she is allowed to revert you ? --La femme de menage (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Per WP:BRD, it should stay as it was before the change until/unless a new consensus emerges from discussion. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Sure. I know this way of thinking. Cheers. --La femme de menage (talk) 02:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

This "way of thinking" is Wikipedia policy. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oakland Athletics minor league players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distrito Federal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

The image of the perpetrator is nominated as FFD. I invite you for commentary. --George Ho (talk) 19:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Based on what you said, you should vote to delete.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 19:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

What's confusing about that the subject is clearly notable and any content disputes should be worked through on the article's talk page? I'm confused by your delete vote.– Muboshgu (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

You lack strategic thinking.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 20:35, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I put in for page protection of Jordan Zimmermann at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Hopefully that will cut down on the vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It's been approved, problem solved. Taffe316 (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

People just don't remember the deals that fall through (*cough* Wilmer Flores). – Muboshgu (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

For every page changed before deals are official, Wilmer sheds another tear. Taffe316 (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
70		Major League Baseball rosters (talk)						Add sources
109		Polish People's Party (talk)						Add sources
7		Cha Woo-chan (talk)						Add sources
5		Yang Hyeon-jong (talk)						Add sources
99		KBO League (talk)						Add sources
28		Asian Baseball Championship (talk)						Add sources
2		Kim Kwan-yong (talk)						Cleanup
126		Rick DiPietro (talk)						Cleanup
22		History of the Miami Marlins (talk)						Cleanup
4		Jang Won-sam (talk)						Expand
18		2010 Toronto Blue Jays season (talk)						Expand
48		Doosan Bears (talk)						Expand
144		Buddy Caldwell (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
794		Chicago White Sox (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
48		Home Run Derby (Major League Baseball) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2		Vince Conde (talk)						Merge
64		Lila Rose (talk)						Merge
10		Michael Ynoa (talk)						Merge
577		Uralic languages (talk)						Wikify
3		Yang Sang-moon (talk)						Wikify
13		Cody Ransom (talk)						Wikify
0		Misael Argeñal (talk)						Orphan
1		Financial Hub Center (talk)						Orphan
3		Lee Wang-pyo (talk)						Orphan
4		Erik Cordier (talk)						Stub
1		Kevin Pucetas (talk)						Stub
244		TVF Pitchers (talk)						Stub
3		Kim Seong-han (talk)						Stub
28		Boy Logro (talk)						Stub
8		Mary Grace Baloyo (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the "thanks", and you're welcome. Quick question: did you (a) intentionally thank me 3 times for the same edit, (b) accidentally thank me 3 times for the same edit, but knew you'd done it, or (c) only thank me once, and MediaWiki is acting up yet again and notified me 3 times? (It's certainly no big deal, and I'm not complaining!) I ask because someone I'm not really on good terms with thanked me 4 times for an edit a week or two ago, and although it would have made sense for them to thank me once, as a kind of olive branch, I kind of assumed they were being a jerk because of the number. Now that you thanked me 3 times, I'm wondering if the poor guy wasn't trying to annoy me, but was made to look bad by the software. Makes me feel kind of bad, and very glad I dropped it and didn't go complain about them somewhere... --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

I think (b), or maybe (c). It didn't immediately go through, so I might've clicked it more than once. It could be a software problem, hopefully that editor wasn't being a jerk. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Embarrassingly, I misremembered what happened; the editor I had in mind only thanked me once and I couldn't figure out his intentions, and another editor thanked me 4 times for something, and I never bothered to ask them why. Got them conflated in my aging brain. So I'm pretty sure it was a software glitch for both of you. Anyway, thanks, and cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

We're all older than we used to be, if we're lucky. Thanks for editing the ITN blurb. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

I was the first to edit John Lackeys page why did you make a change to take credit for it. That is jacked up. Rojocube (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't know how many times to tell you this: there is no such thing as "credit" here. You made a bad set of edits without a source. Yes, you put it in the edit summary, but it belongs on the page. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I did have a source.http://vineline.mlblogs.com/2015/12/08/cubs-and-rhp-john-lackey-agree-on-two-year-deal/ you clearly ignored it to boost your ego to steal my thunder and take credit once it became official b — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rojocube (talk • contribs) 21:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

"Credit" from whom? There is no such thing and believe I don't do anything here to "boost my ego". You need to put the source with text ON THE PAGE and you didn't do that. You also made some funky edit to the banner template that I was undoing. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I saw on B/R that he got traded, so I added it. It is NOT VANDALISM BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW HOW TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE. Let me be free. Go on ESPN and look. I dare you. Do it. It is all over the place. (Sorry, I forget, on B/R it did not say anything. Can you put this in a response because I don't how to really respond back.) Tybomb124 (talk) 01:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I've looked. They say it's pending medicals. Remember how certain everyone was that Wilmer Flores was traded back in July? That's why we have to wait for final confirmation. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

@Tybomb124: You can refer to Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1 for a crash course on adding citations. Worst case, just add the URL to the edit summary.—Bagumba (talk) 03:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

it was officially reported by several close mlb insiders, talked about on mlb network, and was confirmed by local news and espn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.218.232 (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Not confirmed. The Aroldis Chapman deal falling apart should show you that these deals do fall through. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Sources: http://www.timesunion.com/sports/article/Yankees-acquire-Cubs-Castro-6685140.php

http://www.pinstripealley.com/yankees-rumors-hot-stove/2015/12/8/9874390/yankees-cubs-trade-starlin-castro-adam-warren-brendan-ryan

I you could restore my edits that would be greatly appreciated. Sneakycrown (talk) 03:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Better source: "The player to be named will reportedly be infielder Brendan Ryan." That's not 100% confirmation. If it's a player to be named later, then he will be named later. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

My apologies. shall clear up any further edits with you first.

Oh, and plus, yahoo sports: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/report--yankees-acquire-starlin-castro-from-cubs-010607312.html Sneakycrown (talk) 03:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Yeah it's best to be clear because sometimes the sources contradict each other. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I made the same mistake at the 2016 Chicago Cubs season and used a ref. mentioning B. Ryan. I then went to the Roster and clicked "transactions" which took me to the MLB.com site which, I assume, is as official as it gets. PTBNL was used there... so I changed the info Buster Seven Talk 04:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey good job today man. There was a lot going on and a lot of IPs not understanding that a trades is not official till its official, but we made it lol. Taffe316 (talk) 05:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! You too. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Evan Scribner page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

The trade was officially announced 1 hour before I changed the Wikipedia page. It was confirmed by both the Astros and Phillies. Jordandlee (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Great, thanks for waiting for the confirmation that it indeed happened. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Why remove my revision when before I even entered the page it had labeled him a San Diego Padre. All I did was add his updated info, nothing more. You should check better at who puts players with their new team without even putting; 1)a source 2) for who they were traded for and the date and 3) why put just the name of their new team on their profile box but not update anything else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1remains (talk • contribs) 22:12, December 10, 2015‎

I removed it because you didn't source it. You should include a source if you don't want to see your edits reverted. Remember the other day when everyone was sure Aroldis Chapman was traded? He wasn't. I will revert any unsourced addition of that sort without question and won't apologize for it. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

8 years 180million

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2577003-jason-heyward-to-cubs-latest-contract-details-comments-reaction Rojocube (talk) 19:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

"Financial terms are not yet available"... I'm not seeing any official announcements or confirmation that he's passed a physical and signed on the dotted line. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

8 years 185 million. Its just been announced. For the terms. So it's official JHey is a cubs. I would take the credit for it but once I change it you'll change it back so you're the last edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rojocube (talk • contribs) 19:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Reporters are reporting it, but reporters are often enough wrong. It's not mentioned at Cubs twitter or any other official place, so it's not official. And again with this "credit" thing, I have no idea what "credit" you think any of us get for this. If you change it back, I will revert you, unless it's confirmed as official. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Announced is not the same as official. We are not newspaper reporters that want to be the "first with the story". When it shows up here its more than likely "Official". So far, I don't see it...but it is good news. Buster Seven Talk 20:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Or if it shows up here. Honestly, all of this rush to edit reminds me of one of my favorite articles by The Onion: "Area Man Honored To Be One Who Added Death Date To Heath Ledger's Wikipedia Page". – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

First of all, that last sentence was disrespectful, don't act like a prick just because you revert things just because you see fit in doing so. Second, if you had seen the player page before I edited it, someone had put that he was a Padre WITHOUT EVEN PUTTING A SOURCE! YET, MY EDITS WERE REVERTED... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1remains (talk • contribs) 15:22, December 11, 2015‎

How was that disrespectful? I simply pointed out that I'll revert any edit that doesn't meet WP:V. Now, you calling me a "prick", that's pretty disrespectful. I can't speak for whatever edits you're talking about before yours, but I strive to revert them all. And please, end all of your talk page comments with your signature. Four tildes. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

First of all, its none of your business and second of all, I'm a card carrying member of the Liberal Party of Canada. So, if you feel compelled to use ad hominem characterizations, at least be correct, please. I'm not really mad, actually it always seems odd and interesting to me to see how some people are so quick to assume things about other people and throw a label on them and how more often than not the labels don't fit, e.g. with McCarthyism. If you wish to enjoy some personal growth, I'd suggest trying to go a day without assuming anything about anybody; and then a week; and then a month...get the idea? I'm just trying to be of use to you and your editing accomplishments with this suggestion. Nocturnalnow (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

You're right that I shouldn't use labels. I apologize. I wanted to say "you with the anti-Clinton agenda", since you clearly have one, but that was a bit cumbersome to type. There's no assumption in that, your behavior does speak for itself. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

I do not have an anti-Clinton agenda. I just think there is a tendency among editors to give high level U.S. politicians a non NPOV positive slant on their BLPs. Its obvious I think. Just look at the difference between Nixon's lede and Putin's. Putin's BLP is much more NPOV I think, whereas Nixon, both Bushes and both Clintons' ledes are over-weighted on the positive and puffy. If I am correct, its likely a natural result from a majority of editors who look up to the office of President of the United States and the people who occupy it; I don't have that predisposition. Nocturnalnow (talk) 21:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tommy Hanson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian McCann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

	Seasons Greetings
	Christmas! Christmas, everywhere, on every talk page, I do dispair Seasons being greeted and Wikibreaks told, but still time for a little more editing, for being WP:BOLD! So go on, go forth and enjoy beyond concern Your Wiki will be waiting for when you return. Buster Seven Talk 19:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This card was designed by User:Samtar

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brad Winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Any idea on how to handle things like [[1]]? You seem to have more experience with the crazies than I do. Taffe316 (talk) 07:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@Taffe316: Pretty much handle it the way you're handling it, matter of fact and relying on WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. I'd try to mention some of the notable deals that fell through. Seriously people already forgot about Iwakuma? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Yeah I guess they did forget about that already, even though it was like a week ago. Alright well thanks man, I appreciate it. Taffe316 (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
332		Murray Rothbard (talk)						Add sources
3		John Spiros (talk)						Add sources
734		Falcon 9 booster landing tests (talk)						Add sources
3		Medal of Honor Aircraft (talk)						Add sources
125		Disney Research (talk)						Add sources
706		Cincinnati Reds (talk)						Add sources
6,202		Chewbacca (talk)						Cleanup
1,816		Wookiee (talk)						Cleanup
40		Mets–Yankees rivalry (talk)						Cleanup
645		Aftermath (Star Wars novel) (talk)						Expand
12,404		Palpatine (talk)						Expand
140		Speeder bike (talk)						Expand
3,056		The Force (Star Wars) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
6,671		Star Wars expanded universe (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
35		Kerner Optical (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
154,204		Star Wars (talk)						Merge
1,211		AOL (talk)						Merge
396		Jedi Council (talk)						Merge
56		Rosetta Stone (company) (talk)						Wikify
4		Paul Bangay (talk)						Wikify
453		School shooting (talk)						Wikify
38		Llewyn Davis (character) (talk)						Orphan
4		Beecroft's Toys (talk)						Orphan
2		ManOpen (talk)						Orphan
3		Gary Hebl (talk)						Stub
3		Cody Horlacher (talk)						Stub
5		Brossard—Saint-Lambert (talk)						Stub
4		Tyler Vorpagel (talk)						Stub
5		Mark Born (talk)						Stub
2		Oskaloosa High School (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Iknowthegoods. You recently undid an edit I made to the page Joakim Soria, claiming that I had added premature information about a reported sports transaction. I beg to differ. The transaction is NOT based on anonymous sources and HAS been officially announced. I have since gone ahead and re-update the article, and have included a cite a reliable source. If you still believe I have made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Iknowthegoods (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I was just wondering why, after I updated my Joakim Soria contribution and added citations, you went back and again deleted it? The first time you let me know and told me what I needed to do, etc. The second time, there was no explanation. I'm asking honestly, because if what I added was STILL unfit, even with the cited source and whatnot, I'd like to know for future reference. Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Thank you. . – Iknowthegoods (talk) 03:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Still waiting for a response. Do I need to start a new topic on your talk page? – Iknowthegoods (talk) 03:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I was hoping you could refer to (and answer) my question regarding my contributions to the Joakim Soria page. You can find the information and the question in the Joakim Soria, 2015 section above. Thank you. – Iknowthegoods (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I missed that earlier post, and just now got back from a holiday break. I'll check into it. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

If you're referring to this edit, it's because it wasn't an official transaction yet. That was December 9. The deal was made official on December 10, the day he passed his physical exam. That exam is a prerequisite for any deal's completion, as failed physicals have tanked agreed-upon deals before (see Grant Balfour for an example). – Muboshgu (talk) 20:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey there! Hopefully I'm doing this right. Thanks for correcting my mistake. I was informed that someone was coming right after me and filling out the page Frank Edelblut with information from frankedelblut.com... but I guess he didn't show up. Thank you so much for the welcome though! I'll definitely look into how things are done here at Wikipidea. Jedelblut (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Muboshgu, may you continue to make Wikipedia a better place in the New Year. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 07:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:FA-Class National Football League/New York Giants subproject articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, happy new year. I've given you a review at the link above. I'll be happy to approve it if you could address the minor quibble and perhaps come up with a more gripping hook. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I was planning on adding the reference after I finished some work I was doing. For now look it up was so it didn't get removed. I wanted people to know that it was a real thing. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

No, read WP:BLP. Some random Twitter users claiming that he cheated doesn't belong in his bio, even with a source. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

There are articles about it, it's just the original photos were posted on Twitter, and then loads of sites made articles on it. Leggomygreggo8 (talk)

Those "loads of sites" don't follow Wikipedia's guidelines for handling biographies. They post whatever they want to post, and we have to be selective in what we incorporate. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Pennsylvania lieutenant governor elections, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Naraht (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jacob deGrom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Why did you take my edit away on Daniel Murphy? Mets1237 (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Because it was unsourced and redundant with the existing sourced info. I should have included that in my edit summary but I accidentally completed the edit without one. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

The fact I can get it right away with the new version is better to be the first half of the day before I get a follow back on my way home from work to be the first half of the day before I get a follow back on my way home from work to be the- Mets1237 (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Mets1237

I don't understand a word of what you typed there. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

than a week and a lot more fun and I don't think that I have a great way of the day before I get a follow back on my way home and watch movies and I love the new version is not the same as I can Mets1237 (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Mets1237

The article Jacob deGrom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jacob deGrom for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Tyler Austin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Muboshgu. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Thilawa of Yamethin.
Message added 07:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Finn (Star Wars) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Muboshgu. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Captain Phasma.
Message added 08:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request to revisit the discussion per discussion about alt hooks there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Also see question about a double hook. Yoninah (talk) 10:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

That shade of orange, the team's primary color, is not compliant. In other words, it violates WP:COLOR/WP:CONTRAST. It may be easy for some to read, but not the visually impaired. Thanks, ❄ Corkythehornetfan ❄ 19:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Full Frontal with Samantha Bee at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Could you help me by taking a look at the DYK for Jonas Åkerlund (politician). It had bern reviewed but the review doesnt show, and I am only available via a mobile phone for the next 24 hrs so editing is limited. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll take a look. I do need more QPQs. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: I fixed it. The reviewer edited the template in a way they shouldn't have, which messed it up. It now appears on t:tdyk properly. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Eric Lindros trade at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Giants2008 (Talk) 02:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Tyler Austin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bagumba (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

I attempted to add a reference to an online video posted by MSNBC back in 2013.... I am pretty new to WP editing, and must have done it incorrectly.. my bad. It appears I am no longer able to edit anything on the page. Sorry for my errors... is this something you can do?

The section I wanted to edit was:

Position on reproductive lawMain article: Fetal heartbeat bill § ArkansasRapert authored a bill to ban all abortions in Arkansas after twelve weeks of pregnancy.[5] In 2013, a federal judge stopped the law from being implemented, saying it was likely unconstitutional.[6]

I would like to add"Senator Rapert garnered nationwide attention on the issue when Rachel Maddow from MSNBC News picked up the story. (referencing the following link: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/arkansas-gop-struggling-to-keep-up-with-america-17218627693) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoliticalWhistle (talk • contribs) 12:50, January 24, 2016‎

If you want to make an edit to the page, you need to make an edit request at Talk:Jason Rapert. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)