Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from RichardWeiss! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome SqueakBox 04:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Citing studies out of context

Please provide the reference to the vitamin C study you cited. I'd like to check to see at what dosage level they claim vitamin C is ineffective at. Also, did you read the study, the database abstract, or an article citing the study through the abstract? Where does your info come from?  The Transhumanist   05:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

DIC

See the differential interference contrast microscopy page for my reply to your message. - Zephyris Talk 11:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I wish I could inherit a DIC microscope... :( - Zephyris Talk 19:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
im afraid not.... - Zephyris Talk 19:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Scholary Papers

1913 advertisement for Encyclopædia Britannica, the oldest and one of the largest contemporary English Encyclopedias.

Information should be free, yet researchers protect it. --Parker007 00:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the praise, and I'm always happy to receive a second barnstar (nudge, wink). The biggest thing the muscle pages could use is references, I've got a BSc in Kinesiology, but my textbooks are 5-10 years old and unfortunately I'm still not considered a reliable source. Did you have a look at the Isometric exercise page? It could arguably be merged into the muscle contraction page, but it might be too long has a bunch of extra info only relevant to itself. Do you do any strength training? There's a whole whack of pages that could always use a look-through.

Regards debates, the only thing I'm interested in from sincere contributors is more references! I can usually hold my own since I've got the background, but if you notice something I say is wrong, please correct me.

WLU 00:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)