User talk:SL93/Archive 5

User:Joe Chill has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Joe Chill's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Joe Chill! Peace, Rlevse 00:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC) A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

PS you should archive some of this talk page ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 00:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

I have re-opened the above AfD, as references had been added to the article since the last comment was left, and no one had addressed these new references.

Your input at the discussion would be most welcome! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)ps: apologies for not notifying you earlier when I notified all the other participants in the AfD - I overlooked your name on it! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

While I've tried twice now on WT:CSD to introduce speedy essay reasons to no avail, it is still quite apparent that this is a problem. I guess there's nothing that can be done. Anyway, I see you often on my AFDs for essays, and I'm sure I've commented on some of yours. If you ever have an AFD that goes unnoticed and you need a vote, let me know. It seems we have similar thoughts on such matters. Cheers. — Timneu22 · talk 15:21, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Note that I've replied on my talk page, and I'm no longer watching this page. Easier to keep the conversation in one place. Thanks again. — Timneu22 · talk 15:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey I just wanted to tell you that you have the single most bad-ass username of anyone on wikipedia. If you are ever in buffalo NY sometime let me know and I will buy you a beer. Peace 67.246.175.103 (talk) 05:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

--Nomination--Thank you for your support!

Cheers,Bruinfan12 (talk) 12:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)You my my day!

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

-- Cirt (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know that the above AfD, which you participated in, has been relisted due to some significant sourcing being done since you commented. If you have time to review the changes made, it would help form a consensus one way or another - if you feel it's still insufficiently notable, by all means say so. ~ mazca ^talk 11:34, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

I've been away for a while and come back to find the article had been deleted at your request. I'm not going to cry over split milk nor do I want to get into I flamewar but I am curious as to why when the talk page learly showed that it had been put up for deletion immediatly after it was created and on appeal kept (I'm not going to recreate it as I don't have the time to log in every day to continuously appeal deletions).

The article The Imp (television series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. This "series" of one minute long shorts is not even listed at IMDB.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xajaso (talk) 18:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2B (magazine), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2B (magazine) (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lionel (talk) 00:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Your input has been missed. Hope all is well. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

• • Seconded, thought I hadn't seen you around for a while, good to see you back :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

-- Cirt (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Crissal Thrasher at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mikenorton (talk) 05:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Joe, I noticed that the hook and the related sentences in the article were a really close paraphrase of the source, a tightrope that we all walk I know, but this does need addressing. Mikenorton (talk) 05:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Mikenorton. --Orlady (talk) 05:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

This article i created was deleted back in the summer, as I was away from wikipedia for a long time I did not notice this happening.Yes it is fair that there is no notable online resources that covered the previous event. I will rectify this in getting resources saved for the one in 2011. But to re-instate the article is the evidence I will provide at the end of this comment suffice? It is a "draft" calendar for 2011 DTL clay shooting in the UK for championships, drafted by the UK governing body Clay Pigeon Shooting Association It clearly shows the location for the event in 2011 at Culbann C.P.C.

http://www.cpsa.co.uk/userfiles/file/Calendar2011.pdf

Thanks for any help.--Weeman com (talk) 19:12, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

The article The Imp (television series) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Imp (television series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Xajaso (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 18th Street Singers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 18th Street Singers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

	Tough as Nails Award
	I present you, Joe Chill, with the Tough as Nails Award for standing your ground and keeping calm in the face of personal attacks. I commend you for this excellent endurance! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 21:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I wasn't always that way. I remember when I use to get in huge arguments because of personal attacks. Now, I just find no reason to reply and report the user where necessary. Joe Chill (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello Joe Chill. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Deliver Us From Evil (Espion Series), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to books. Converted to PROD instead. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

But it is only available online. Joe Chill (talk) 22:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

I think you've identified a gray area. A7 says it applies to web content, but not to books. So where do ebooks fall? I'll start a discussion at WT:CSD. Feel free to join in. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Alright. I'll join in. Joe Chill (talk) 23:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Response from the Author: Hi there. Thank you for your comments, but it is a book, an e-book granted, but still a book. I had received an email from someone that was trying to find the book and they suggested adding some brief details to Wikipedia. I was eager not to use Wikipedia as an advertising slot so left it with a simple explanation of the book synopsis and that it isn't out in paper form yet. I puposely did not include information about where to buy it etc. As far as I can tell the criteria mentioned states that "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." I have not written an article about me, only the book.

Also my apoligies for deleting the Speedy deletion thing on the page, if this is wrong. The information about this is a little contradictory and as I can't find either the button or tag it seemed the only option. AnniMation (talk) 07:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok, honey. Thanks for letting me know. Stephanie J Stone (talk) 00:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello Joe Chill. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Barbie World Mixtape, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 only applies if the artist has no article, but Nicki Minaj does. Consider PROD or AfD - it seems unlikely that an "unofficial mixtape" released on the internet meets WP:NALBUMS. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

That part seems to be a hoax. The original speedy deleted article said that it was fanmade. Joe Chill (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe Chill. Thanks for your great contribution to the "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Cyber" page. I think we need more articles like your "Chill of the night". Cdccyber (talk) 02:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

I like the article Chill of the Night!, but it would be nice to get it past Start Class. It's hard to do for a children's animation episode. Joe Chill (talk) 03:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

The title is a reference to the Skull and Crossbones. That the filmmakers chose to capitalize the "B" in crossbones only added to confusions and led some reviewers to incorrectly seperate the word into two parts for their reviews. The correct title is just as you have it in your article. Good job. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

I have added some reliable sources for the article. Can I remove the proposed deletion tag? Bekiroflaz (talk) 09:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

You added some good sources. Go ahead. Joe Chill (talk) 12:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello. You've placed an AFD on Mixxx. I agree, the current sources do not establish notability. I'm not really familiar with cite requirements for software, especially since so much of the information on this programs is in blog format.

This link, for example: Mixxx Debuts As Number One In The Mac App Store Apparently, it was the number one free download for a while in the Apple App store. I suspect that it's similarly popular with Linux users, since it's in most repositories. If I can find any sources, I'll add them to the article, but any help, and/or specific criticism would be appreciated.Grayfell (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

You asked if it seems like a reliable source for software information. I read the Lifehacker article, and looked at their site. They would not be a RS if it were a blog full of anonymous postings. But to the contrary, it has staff writers, editors, and identified contributions, all of which help establish it as a RS. It would still fail if it were a non-credible spam site, or if they promoted some dubious and extreme positions. Again, to the contrary, various RS news organizations have cited them favorably. Time in 2005 listed them as a top website which "dispenses sound tech advice." I re-read WP:RS, and see lots of discussion of books , newspapers, and scholarly journals, but little about exclusively on-line sites. So I checked RS noticeboard and noted that CNET, an online computer news site, was judged to be a reliable source because it has an editorial staff and identified staff writers, so there is presumably fact checking. The same judgement might then be applied to Lifehacker, and it looks like a RS to me. You might bounce it off Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Thanks for tipping me off to an interesting website. Edison (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe!I am willing to become your newest adoptee! Thank You for your offer! --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 16:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Gourami Watcher's talk page.
Message added 11:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for your AfD participation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Hatton. Since you made your initial comments, the article has been substantially revised by the editor who requested that it be restored after previous PROD deletion. Please reevaluate the article and see if your !vote in that AfD reflects your assessment of the updated article. Jclemens (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe, sorry to see that you've had a lot of frustrating experiences lately. It can be very difficult dealing with other editors that are attacking or criticizing you, especially since the threshold for something being considered a "personal attack" is rather high these days. Whenever I get frustrated with dealing with other editors, I try to concentrate on just writing articles and stay away from the more dramatic areas of the project (like DYK and AN/I). Or if I'm having a serious problem, I'll ask another editor I trust to intervene on my behalf. Anyway, just wanted to say that I empathize with your frustrations and offer my assistance if you need anything. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 22:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement and advice. Joe Chill (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe Chill, I was interested to see your notice pf approval of a DYK hook which could appear on our main page here immediately below my recently posted copyright concern raised with that same editor, originating from a different current DYK submission. Have you reviewed my concerns, and extended that review to the artice you've just OK'd? I found some problems in that one too, but waiting for the intial response from the editor. Franamax (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I reviewed the sources a second time while expanding an article. Is there any actions to be taken to stop these copyright violations? Joe Chill (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Well... I just randomly started looking at what's underneath the DYK noms and tried three. One looked OK, one used print-only sources and I didn't compare to that editor's other work, and the third submission was a hit (HTV 2), massive copying. I left them a TP notice after looking at three of their articles, and flagged one up at WP:CP. I looked at a few more and I have enough concern I'm thinking about filing at WP:CCI, but I'm waiting for their response first. I'm only poking a nose into DYK but I'd really have to say that reviewers could be doing more than checking the hook. It wasn't all that hard to spot this, but maybe we could talk more about ways to check this stuff? Or put another way I guess, why didn't you catch it? :) Franamax (talk) 01:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

You're right that I should have caught it, but I was focused on another article as well. I guess that might answer your question about why copyvios and other errors get through onto the main page. Maybe copyvios get through because of lack of concentration. I would like to say that may be the case for the most part, but the comments from members about not trying hard enough to do good reviews and copyvios slipping through onto the main page makes me think of something far worse - laziness. Joe Chill (talk) 01:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Y'know, I don't doubt your or pretty much anyone else's dedication to making things better, and to keep the main page working well. Me, I'm not all that good at answering to a time clock. :) I think you hit the nail on the head though about being able to concentrate and do a through job, rather than just try to get all the jobs done. I've said for a while now that DYK should slow down the rotation - and by extension, put some additional selectivity into main page DYK appearances. (Which yes, will cause it's own problem of deciding which new articles are "best") I don't fault you at all for trying, but hey, it's Wikipedia, I can fault you all day for your results. ;) Copyright violators we can deal with, once they come to general attention. People taking the time to check, just like people willing to deal with DYK, much rarer commodity. We need to help each other. Franamax (talk) 02:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe, I saw you proposed deletion of GNU Gatekeeper, because you think it is non-notable. I am so surprised why you made such a proposal.

GNU Gatekeeper is a very famous free / open source software in the VoIP world. It's the key component of an H.323 network. The project started 12 years ago, and still well maintained. A new version is just relesed 3 weeks ago. Over 60% of the users use it in production. Please see the survey result of 2010.

For the wikipage of GNU Gatekeeper, I created it in Feb 2009. From the history I saw at least 8 individual named editors and over 10 anonymous editors helped to improve and maintain this item. The last updated date is Jul 28 2011. The key point is I don't know any of these editors. They helped to improve the page I created just because they think the GNU Gatekeeper item is important enough to be well maintained. The fact simply proves this item is notable enough.

From your page I didn't see you have any strong background about VoIP or free / open source software. If you have any suggestion to improve this item, please kind let me know. But please don't just say it's non-notable since this is totally not true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwhuang (talk • contribs) 02:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Just passing by this user talk page and had a quick look at the article. It seems an eminent candidate for deletion. I don't see one single reference there to independent verifiable and reliable sources that say why this particular software is important. We need more than what's there - what have other (non-developer, non-user) people had to say about the software? If the sources are silent, then so are we. Franamax (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Joe, Franamax, do you have any background about the VoIP and H.323? If not, how could you judge the key component in this field is not important? As a reference, the H.323 page cites GnuGK as an example application. I didn't involve any editing of the H.323 item, so it is totally independent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwhuang (talk • contribs) 03:31, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Try to read and understand WP:N and WP:RS. Wikipedia articles can't be used as references for other articles. I am uninterested in explaining further because I know where these software notability debates end up. It is a Wikipedia classic - significant technical information vs Wikipedia notability, not having background in it vs a lot of background in it, and important vs notable. I had a three day debate with a software editor that got other editors involved and it was a big mess. Even when the debate isn't that bad, it is the same three principles that I mentioned. I am not interested in that. Joe Chill (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Consider it a sweet treat for being brave. Well done you! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Good, someone already gave you a cookie :-) I agree. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

It's a long time ago, but I guess that I had a request from the anon, now logged in, or another editor interesting in improving the article. I usually agree to requests to sandbox deleted text if it seems reasonable, in this case it looks as if I then promptly forgot about it. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, the button I thought I was pressing was blocking one of the users that you CSD'd their page...my bad, totally sorry for the inconvenience. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at DeltaQuad's talk page.
Message added 20:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- DQ (t) (e) 20:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

With catching all these attack pages. To my mind they are the most important pages to delete quickly.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I use Wikipedia's advanced search function to only search user pages for words that are common in vandalism and attack pages. Joe Chill (talk) 22:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I am hoping that someone doesn't complain about me giving admins too much work to do. It is just that I put myself on clean-up duty in order to help in an area where not many editors work with. Joe Chill (talk) 22:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

That will never happen. If it did they deserve an immediate whack.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I added some references to Point Zero. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point Zero. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Debresser's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for helping and resolving this problem, I tried my best to be a roll backer but I want to be one as soon as possible because, I watch most of the articles such as terrorism and crime and I watch those pages in order to avoid vandalism. I really want to be a rollbacker in terrorism topics. Please reply as soon as possible.--Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion, we should rarely use CSD criteria in user space. Obvious exceptions are Copyvio and attacks. While the User:Ctwomen/Connecticut Women's Hall of Fame needs some work, that's exactly what user space drafts are for.--SPhilbrickT 15:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

It is a promotion only account. Compare the username Ctwomen to Connecticut Women's Hall of Fame and read the promotional language. Joe Chill (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

It was deleted even though I didn't tag it again. Joe Chill (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

For future reference in relation to the bewildering array of rules and policies at Wikipedia, you should be aware that the page was deleted for copyright infringement (it was a copy of the website), not for its promotional tone. --Orlady (talk) 15:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

I really have never understood it. I have tagged many user pages for deletion and sub pages that are obvious advertising which were deleted. In this case, it was obviously promotional, but my speedy was declined. I reported two vandalism accounts that were denied on the basis that they didn't edit in 30 minutes once an admin got to it. Also, it wasn't a copyvio because the organization created the user page so they owned the content. Joe Chill (talk) 15:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Uh, yes, it was a copyvio. The possible fact that the person adding the material is associated with the creator of the content doesn't change that. I support the removal of material from user space for copyvio.--SPhilbrickT 15:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

That still doesn't change the fact that it should have still been deletable as promotional content. This is the first time in a long while that an admin has actually denied my speedy deletion of a page like this. Joe Chill (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

We have policies , guidelines and informal procedures that are sometimes in conflict. For example, G11 technically applies to a user space draft, so I'm not surprised that you have tagged others and they have been deleted. My edit didn't say your tag was wrong, I just feel that a user space draft, especially when non-indexed, isn't creating any harm. We have informal rules allowing more leeway in user space drafts than in article drafts. This is a perfect example where the best course (had there not been a copyvio) would be to pitch in and help, rather than delete. A Hall of Fame has clear potential to be a viable topic, and I expect it will be. I understand why you thought the article was promotional, and in article space, I would have immediately agreed. (Although my recommended action would have been to move it to user space). Someday, I'll take on the bigger task, and make a case that the policy wording should be modified to reflect what many editors believe, but changing policy isn't a light task, and I'm not up for it at the moment. (Or perhaps I'll take it on, lose the argument and become convinced that I should be supporting removal)--SPhilbrickT 15:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

If you have any concerns that, say, in an RfA, someone will note this as an example of a mistaken tag, let me be perfectly clear. Your tag was not wrong. I invoked WP:IAR to achieve what I felt was a better course for the encyclopedia. I did miss the copyvio. In fact, I was fixing the flawed references, and so would have detected it a few minutes later, but it was caught by someone literally as I was editing it.--SPhilbrickT 15:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

I disagree about it being the best course of action. I am against helping people with promotional usernames advertise on Wikipedia. I am not ever going for RFA. An autopatroller and rollbacker is good enough for me. My reasoning behind not going for RFA is that it has a large chance of putting me to shame. I try to make people happy, but then an admin says that I have a feces fetish, an admin says that I have no understanding of Wikipedia policies, admins tell me that f off it not a personal attack if the other editor is disruptive, and inclusionist editors have many nasty things to say to me in AfD. I do understand your reasoning so I won't have a debate about it. Joe Chill (talk) 16:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

hi thanks for the welcome message. cheers. NorthFarWest (talk) 17:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Would you consider going through an adoption program with me? I would analyze some of your edits and help you learn many things which would assist you in your editing here on Wikipedia. Ryan Vesey Review me! 01:19, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

No thanks. I had an adopter before when I was Schuym1, but then he obviously got tired of me because he started ignoring my questions. Joe Chill (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I am also sorry you had a poor experience with the adoption program; however, I can assure you that I will stick with you through the program and assist you with any questions you have. That being said, you are under no obligation to go through the program. Ryan Vesey Review me! 01:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

If you would like to remove vandalism in a way that is less controversial (although I haven't been aware of much of the controversy of your edits) try using Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool in conjunction with Twinkle. You are able to screen recent edits and revert them if they are vandalism. Ryan Vesey Review me! 01:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, You tagged User:Prince Banks for speedy deletion as an attack page. However, it had actually been vandalized. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

It looked like an attack page to me and was deleted as an attack page. Joe Chill (talk) 19:01, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I did check the history including the first version. Joe Chill (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I undeleted the page. Look at the history; IPs had vandalized the page. I'm going to RevDel the edits after you see them. I also notified the admin about deleting without reading the history. :P Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

The article that you asked me to take a look at, I'm still working on it, I had some things come up in real life that needed taking care of and I still intend on looking at it. Sorry about the long wait, I can do it tomorrow. Thank you for your understanding in advance. :-)  JoeGazz  ♂  22:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Alright. Mike Allen classed it as a B anyway. I also nominated it for Good Article status. Joe Chill (talk) 22:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, well in that case, I'll see if I want to review it or let someone else handle it. I hope it passes for you :)  JoeGazz  ♂  14:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Joe. I have Gorillas (video game) on my watch list, so I noticed that you recently reverted an edit by 203.206.207.51 and left a note on that editor's talk page about their "removal of content," asking them to provide an edit summary. The thing is, that edit had an edit summary: "cull external links". The external links section of that article had become a mess—mostly a bunch of links to various people's reimplementations of the program—and the anonymous editor was cleaning it up in accordance with the guidelines at Wikipedia:External links and WP:LINKFARM. I've redone the anonymous editor's "culling" and left a note on the editor's talk page saying that I think everything they did was appropriate. I am assuming that your revert was just a result of a little oversight—not seeing the edit summary, perhaps. If you do believe those links are useful to the article, though, and should not have been removed, please let me know or discuss it on the article's talk page. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

By the way, I just read your user page and noticed you live in Sioux City. I lived there for three years when I was younger (third through sixth grades), in the northern part of Indian Hills, just south of North High School. It's good to run across another Siouxlander! —Bkell (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

My reasoning was that the edit summary didn't exactly describe why they were being removed. The edit summary "cull external links" isn't all that descriptive. Joe Chill (talk) 05:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Ah, okay, I see. That makes sense. I agree, a more descriptive edit summary would have been nice. —Bkell (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Joe - The paragraph that I removed from the Carcosa was duplicated verbatim later in the same section of the article. It was a relic of the section's former formatting as a trivia list. 69.174.87.20 (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Then please use an edit summary when you remove content. Joe Chill (talk) 19:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

I demand an explanation for removing my edit in the Pamela Conti article I updated. I didn't remove anything that isn't included in the infobox I created for the article, which I created years ago as Pakhtakorienne.

I thus ask you to undo the reversion. 84.123.86.155 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC).

Ok, master. Since you demanded me to tell you why I reverted your edit, I will. You removed a lot of content and references. You could have avoided it by signing into your account or adding an edit summary. Sorry, master, I shall not revert my edit. You can do it yourself because I need to make your bed, clean the house, and polish your shoes. Joe Chill (talk) 23:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at GTBacchus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cheers. -GTBacchus^(talk) 08:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Hehe. Figures the guy with "Chill" in his name nominates a popsicle article for deletion. :D Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I think you need to look again at the Gnews link. The first 4 pages were nothing but false positives or ads. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Strange Son at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 12:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Malcolmxl5's talk page.
Message added 21:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Bomb Pop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, The Tristian (rapper) wikipedia page is not for advertisement/promotions. Tristian is a christian rapper. *[http://www.givenglorytogod.com/tristian.php What improvements dose the article need? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.251.156 (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe! Sorry for not replying-- it has been a busy summer.

Anyway, there are pictures of mummies owned by museums. I'd like to use them for some articles that lack pictures of them, but the museums are in Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands. Could you give me an idea on how to do this? --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 15:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much Joe :-) --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 16:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

I notice that you posted a message to my talk page and then removed it. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to respond to it as I normally answer the simple stuff first. Did you get your question answered elsewhere? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Really? Because I changed the hook from you and the DYK reviewer falling hook-line-and-sinker for a marketing campaign, you remove your praise? Listen, tomorrow its National Euphonium Day in Canada. Does it have any more legitimacy than this gimmick? Nope. It's just someone randomly declaring something. As far as your research shows, it was never "celebrated" again by the company. The word "halitosis" was a fake marketing word, until it began to catch on, and be accepted by the broader culture. Now, it's even recognized by my spell check. If that happened to their national day, hooray, it would be a legitimate hook. But it didn't happen, so it wasn't. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

If you look in Google Books, you will see that it is listed in multiple event books. SL93 (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the project! --Kumioko (talk) 18:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating the article. I spend most of my time writing so I don't always have the time to nominate for DYK. It's much appreciated! SFB 19:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

We're not in disagreement about Guy Williams, Jr. missing on WP:ENT, being somewhat slack on WP:GNG, and not meriting an article. But as he was covered in depth by 'The New York Times and New York Daily News and is sourcable in connection with his father,[1] might you agree that a redirect to Guy Williams (actor)#First artistic steps, where he is already mentioned in just that context, would make sense? Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Like my students, everyone needs a fresh start every once in a while, although not always with a new name. Best of luck in the future! Bearian (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of New Zealand Young Farmers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Imzadi 1979 → 01:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

I may userfy this, time permitting, at a future time, to re-create it. Bearian (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

As it says above, thanks. :) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Worth County Courthouse (Northwood, Iowa) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BabelStone (talk) 00:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi SL93, I have reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Potato Valley Cafe and there are several issues that should be addressed. Could you please see my comments and reply at the nomination page? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 20:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:A Mind of Its Own.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

An article you PROD'd has been restored following a request at WP:REFUND. You may fix the issues in the article, or may choose to submit it for WP:AFD (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Joe! Sorry I haven't talked to you for a while, but I have a new question for you. I would like to have a "menu" or something on my user page that would link my contribs, talk, etc, but I have no idea on how to do it. I saw this on User:CactusWriter and a few other editors. I'd appreciate your reply :-)
--GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 17:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

The article S&Man you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:S&Man for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Why have you nominated me for speedy deletion? I don't even know how to contest it.--Santahul (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bundle (software distribution) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundle (software distribution) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pnm (talk) 20:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Ukexpat's talk page.
Message added 02:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ukexpat (talk) 02:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi SL93, long time no see. I've reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Kurt and Sid and there is a small issue with the hook. Could you please see my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Don't mention it. That sort of stuff happens to me all the time. Dahn (talk) 00:02, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

• A couple bigger issues with Template:Did you know nominations/One of Our Thursdays Is Missing (but easily fixable). The original there is pretty good, but I have another suggestion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of William Arms Fisher at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Orlady (talk) 01:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 08:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Could I ask why you have closed Template:Did you know nominations/The Chimes, Uxbridge as having had no response since 15 November, when the lack of response came from the reviewer rather than myself, the nominator. I asked the reviewer a question that day which would affect how I progressed with preparing the article, to which I have not received a reply. The reviewer returned two weeks later to state no work had been carried out, still neglecting to reply. I have asked another user to complete the review, so would you therefore please reopen it. The nomination was also closed by mistake earlier today. Harrison49 (talk) 23:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I've answered your question at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#How_to_close_DYKs. Harrison49 (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Would you mind reviewing the nomination and letting me know what you think? Harrison49 (talk) 23:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I've made a few changes to the article and feel it is now ready. Would you mind having a look? Harrison49 (talk) 16:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

How do you mean? Harrison49 (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment and support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. I'm glad you're still with us. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your comment got me thinking and looking. The information in the stub article IS already at Chaos and Creation in the Backyard#Special Edition DVD, and I just added a citation. A redirect will do veru well. Thanks for the clue. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

"Delete: No notability has been shown since the article was deleted in the last AfD."

Could you please check our page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarWind_Software

again as we've removed ALL product information and left only valuable references (including hard copy ones).

Is this enough or should we do something more? Can we stay? :)

Thank you very much for cooperation!

AK47

213.238.8.10 (talk) 00:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

The above AfD has been nulled due to sockpuppet-related issues. You're welcome to comment at the new one - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srivatsa Ramaswami (2nd nomination). Cheers, m.o.p 06:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

I hate to tell you this, but you've created an AFD page for this that doesn't link from the article. Not sure what's gone wrong there. :) Paul MacDermott (talk) 23:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

It wasn't taking me to the page before, but it seems to be working ok now. Paul MacDermott (talk) 23:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

You added a deletion notice to Orpie, but there is no actual AFD page. Ma^t_chups 19:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I guess it's a caching problem--when I open Orpie, it has a red link to the AFD page (still, and even after refreshing), but it lets me click through. Ma^t_chups 22:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of StarWind Software. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hu12 (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In Cassin's Sparrow, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Flanks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Orlady (talk) 05:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 08:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)