Turmerick

It was not a racist rant she is a liar, it was an anti-racist remark taken out of context on purpose, that Elen of the Roads purposely overreacted to . Again it was anti-racist!!!!!!!!!! My remark on the talk page of Kazars was "there were Greek people in the Khazar Empire therefor all Greeks are related Khazars and we must kill them" I was obviously in a TALK PAGE not the main page, trying to show the insanity of using books named 'The Jews The World's Foremost Problem' as a historically accurate source. The administrators like Elen were defending as acurrate (I have since won and the page NOW says those books are anti-semitic) and I quote from the source 'Jews are Mongoloid... and Kazaraian who rule the world" that is not an historical source! Elen of the Roads thought I was 'racist' for pointing that out by saying "there were Greek people in the Khazar Empire therefor all Greeks are related Khazars and we must kill them" (Imeant to say 'sic' at the end, on the talk page! I never ever wrote anything else even remotely 'racist' in my editting!!!! or putting the Jews on Racial trial as they have been for a while. I THINK ELEN OF THE ROADS SHOULD NOT BE AN ADMINISTRATOR! and I definitely should not have been blocked again I have no antigreek thoughts in my entire life that's a joke, and the context was a obvious, and as idiots like Mrs. Roads would have said if the same thing were written but in reality not as I wrote it about Jews they are not a race anyway. I WAS FIGHTING RACISM, on a page that had racism in the TALK section again there is no mentioning of Greeks on the page this is a joke a page quoting racist sources agreed by everyone to be racist I was fight ing it and got accused of racism by somebody who should NOT BE AN ADMINISTRATOR.

If your comment was taken out of context and misinterpreted, then surely you can calmly explain that without resorting to personal attacks against the admin who blocked you! Parody, sarcasm, and similar devices often do not work well in the pure text medium of talk pages, as we do not have the usual visual clues and body language to guide us. I can see how your comment (with the "sic" missing) could be seen as a racist attack, and even if not intended that way, it was at the very least a careless way to make your point. So rather than exploding on the person who saw it as such, I think you need to reflect on your own failure to make yourself clear. So step back a bit, calm down, and try to see your comment as other people would have seen it - and then come back and request unblock again without the anger! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for my anger! I had an angry tone, because I was blocked for months for doing nothing wrong. Again there was nothing racist about my remarks in their context (conversation). I felt the page was racist and forgot to put a 'sic' that i had originally intended. I wrote, NOT, Elen of Roads that Wikipedia should not be used for hate, that same day. My lack of making my sarcasm clear was accidental, now the accusation is anger not racism. I am actually not angry, I just hate the racism on that page, and for me to get accused of exactly what I can prove I was fighting is wrong. And I stand by my claim Ashkenazi Jews are not anything other than the Jews originating in France and Germany (they mixed with Russians later) as they have always claimed and that page is not scholarship but racism. Because the claims of Mongoloid blood has nothing to do with Mongolians who are fine and good, it has to do with hate. One complex racist lie after another is required to make the Khazaar"theory" work, and people's ignorance about Jewish history helps the racist lie along. I have since read Keostler's original work on the subject, he claims a minority of Ashkenazi Jews are related to Khazaars and I know that is extreme the number is negligible. And though the Jews should not be put on genetic trial for the 10 time in human history, they did and again are not Khazaars, over 2% (well it makes sense only one Kazaarian King converted). Keostler made it clear he wrote the book with an agenda to stop anti-semitism, and by making the Jews not semites they would be less hated, and he was never accused of being an historian of Jewish history, prior to the haters catching wind (he was a fiction novelist). Turmerick (talk) 10:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Declined due to lack of response to the question below. Feel free to post another request once you're ready to answer them. Max Semenik (talk) 20:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)