Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drierite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Calcium sulfate#Other uses. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drierite

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been around for many years but there are still no independent sources. It is a drying agent containing Gypsum. Nothing notable there and nothing notable in this article. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 17:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. ~~Delete~~ No independent sources that show any notability. I generally consider redirects with brand names like this, but I don't really see a obviously fitting article to redirect to either. DMacks pointed out below that it is mentioned (unsourced) at Calcium sulfate#Other uses, so that's probably the best place for now. It technically should redirect to [Anhydrite] based on the definition, but I'm fine if it redirects to at least one of the two articles. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Calcium sulfate#Other uses. It's a fairly common name in chemistry (and some related fields) for this use-case of this chemical even if the brand-name itself isn't notable. DMacks (talk) 23:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the problem with brand names is finding articles on the history to distinguish them from the tens of thousands of mentions in Google Scholar and Google Books. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.