Wikipedia:Essays in a nutshell/Article writing

The following are summaries of essays written by users on Wikipedia. This list is incomplete. If you have an essay, or know of an essay that's not included, feel free to add it to the list. Wikipedia also has an introduction for aspiring contributors that provides information and resources on the basics needed to comprehend, comment on, and edit to Wikipedia.

Editing

EssayIn a nutshellShortcutsImpact
Advanced article editingThere are techniques that can make the editing of Wikipedia articles faster and more convenient.WP:EDITFASTLow
Amnesia testIf you can't write an article after leaving all your prior knowledge about the subject behind, it fails the amnesia test, and regardless of how many external links you can dig up that relate to the subject, those links don't satisfy notability guidelines.WP:AMNESIA, WP:FORGETLow
An article is the sum of its partsThe impact of any individual contribution should be considered in regards to the tone and perspective of the article as a whole.WP:PIECEMEAL, WP:PIECEUnranked
Avoid mission statementsMission statements rarely tell us much and should generally not be transcribed in full in Wikipedia articles.WP:MISSION, WP:SLOGANLow
Avoid prelimit of articles as if excluding many of 54 cardsDon't exclude details from articles if the complexity of the subject demands it.WP:54CARDSUnranked
Beef up that first revisionThe articles for deletion and speedy deletion processes would be greatly better off if editors put out solid, substantive drafts as the first mainspace revision of an article rather than just a few lines and the promise that an article will grow in the future.WP:BEEFLow
CherrypickingDo not cherrypick. When selecting information from a source, include contradictory and significant qualifying information from the same source.WP:CHERRYPICKING
WP:CHERRY-PICKING
WP:CHERRYPICK
WP:CHERRY-PICK
Mid
Contributing to WikipediaThe main page that provides information, links, videos and other resources on the basics needed to comprehend, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.WP:HOW
WP:CTW
High
Dictionaries as sourcesDictionaries and glossaries present special challenges and limitations.WP:DICTS
WP:DICTIONARIES
Don't overload your watchlist!A watchlist becomes harder to navigate the longer it is. Only watch articles that need watching.WP:OVERLOADUnranked
Don't teach the controversy(That doesn't mean what you think it means.) Instead, neutrally document the conflict.WP:DTTC
WP:NDTC
Edit countEdit counters are a useful tool, but remember that it's the quality of edits that counts, not the quantity.WP:EC, WP:EDITCOUNTLow
Editing on mobile devicesEditing on Wikipedia can be done on mobile devices, but beware of the challenges.WP:DEVICESUnranked
Editors are not mindreadersPut yourself in the shoes of other editors. How can they distinguish the incomplete, unreferenced article you've just created but plan to improve from one that will never be improved?WP:MINDREADERLow
EndorsementsIn light of BLP, commercial endorsements usually should not be reported in the present tense. Other care also should be applied.WP:ENDORSEMENT
WP:ENDORSEMENTS
WP:ENDORSE
WP:ENDORSED
Example cruftWriting an encyclopedic entry about a subject will involve generalizations. Avoid the temptation to engage in original research by finding every example of a phenomenon, or every exception to a phenomenon.WP:GENERALIZE, WP:EXAMPLES, WP:EXCEPTION, WP:EXAMPLEFARMUnranked
Featured articles may have problemsFeatured articles are not necessarily to be emulated; focus on our policies and guidelinesWP:ARTICLEPROBLEMLow
Minors and persons judged incompetentIn light of BLP, editing about minors and persons legally judged incompetent should be especially protective of their rights.WP:MINORS
WP:INCOMPETENTS
Give an article a chanceDon't be too hasty in nominating newly-created articles for deletion. Remember that some people don't have as much free time to edit as others and that we shouldn't bite the newbies.WP:CHANCELow
Not editing because of Wikipedia restrictionIf your planned article or editing would conflict with Wikipedia's standards, it's happened before. No website can be everything for everyone. Examples follow.WP:NOTEDITING
WP:NOEDITING
WP:NOTEDIT
WP:NOTWRITING
WP:NOWRITING
WP:NOTWRITE
WP:NOWRITE
Nothing is in stoneWikipedia is always bound to changeWP:STONELow
For publicists publicizing a client's workPublicists may want tips on legitimately reporting clients' achievements and have their articles stay in Wikipedia, not deleted.WP:PUBLICITY
WP:PUBLICIST
WP:PUBLICISTS
Robotic editingRobotic editing is the manual performance of the same or similar edit to multiple, perhaps numerous pages.Mid
There is a deadlineIf the preservation or survivability of the knowledge is at stake, contribute it to Wikipedia before it's too late.WP:TIADMid
There is no deadlineWikipedia is a work in progress. Don't rush to edit, it's not a competition.WP:TIND, WP:NORUSH, WP:DEADLINEMid
Vague introductionsExplain the subject of the article concisely in the lead. The lead should summarize the contents of the article.WP:VAIMid
Why Johnny can't wiki-readTechniques to improve the readability of articles.WP:JOHNNYUnranked
Wikipedia is a volunteer serviceThe editors on Wikipedia are mainly volunteers. Editors can contribute as much as they want, and however long they desire.WP:VOLUNTEERLow
Wikipedia is a work in progressWikipedia is constantly being improved and expanded, and it will never be finished.WP:WIP, WP:WNF, WP:NOTDONE, WP:NOTFINISHED, WP:WORKINPROGRESSMid
Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashionWikipedia grows organically, thus the quality of pages is varied.WP:ORGANIZELow
Write the article firstEditors are encouraged to write the article on a given subject before adding a link to the article on list pages, disambiguation pages, or templates.WP:WTAFLow
Writing better articlesA guide on layout and style, and how to make an article clear, precise and relevant to the reader.WP:BETTERMid

Formatting and style

EssayIn a nutshellShortcutsImpact
98 percent table width anomalyTables in class wikitable or infobox, wider than 98%, trigger bottom scroll bars. Use margin-right:0 or infobox margin-left:0 to avoid the scrollbar and allow full width.WP:98WIDELow
Advanced footnote formattingRemote footnotes can be added for pronunciations or examples. Footnotes can be indented, line-split and shortened by deferring details into References or External links. Due to a WP quirk, the 1st footnote on a page might not indent properly. Beware websites violating copyrights.Low
Advanced table formattingTechniques to improve the display or editing of wikitables in WikipediaWP:ADTABLELow
Advanced template codingTechniques to improve the display or editing of templates in Wikipedia.WP:ADTEMPLATELow
Advanced text formattingTechniques to control or adjust the alignment of text on a page.WP:TYPESETLow
Autosizing imagesTechniques to auto-size, or scale, any image ("thumb" or "frameless").WP:Autosizing, WP:Scaling, WP:AUTOSIZE, WP:SCALELow
Avoiding text gapsText gaps may appear on certain browsers, but not on others. Be careful to avoid accidentally creating them.WP:TEXTGAPUnranked
Avoiding Wikipedia quirksThere are many quirks on Wikipedia, but they have workarounds.WP:QUIRKLow
Bare URLsSimply copying and pasting the URL of an online reference is not helpful in the event of linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources.WP:BURL, WP:BURLSUnranked
Don't draw misleading graphsGraphs should accurately represent the context of the data.Low
Don't leave giant breaks between sectionsAvoid whitespace and fix it if spotted.WP:GIANTBREAKSLow
EmersonIf you quote "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" at someone, odds are you are making a fool of yourself, since it has nothing to do with writing-style consistency, but political inflexibility. Plus you're just being an uncivil WP:JERK on purpose.WP:HOBGOBLIN
Graphs and chartsHow to create and use graphs and charts on Wikipedia.Unranked
Overlink crisisAvoid overlinking Wikipedia pages, especially in navboxes or infoboxes.WP:LINKCRISISLow
Common-style fallacyWikipedia has its own set of policies and guidelines for article content and naming (which are distinct from each other). Facts on a subject are drawn from reliable sources, but no particular subset of them (e.g. news publishers) dictates how Wikipedia must write. Style is a matter of Wikipedia community consensus, based on general-audience style guides, not mimicry of any particular genre (or trademark).WP:COMMONSTYLE, WP:CSFUnranked
Specialized-style fallacyWikipedia has its own set of guidelines for article layout and naming. Facts on a subject should be drawn from reliable sources, but how content is styled is a matter for the Wikipedia community and with everyone in mind, not just for specialists who usually write for academic journals or other single-field publications and their limited audiences.WP:SPECIALSTYLE, WP:SSFUnranked
Walled gardenArticles should have outgoing and incoming links to the wider encyclopedia. Don't create a group of articles that exclusively link to each other.WP:WG, WP:WALLLow

Stubs and short articles

EssayIn a nutshellShortcutsImpact
An unfinished house is a real problemAn unfinished article is not a harmless thing. As such you should make it accurate and readable before saving.WP:REALPROBLEMLow
Don't demolish the house while it's still being builtAn article too short to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub and edited, and expanded, rather than simply deleted.WP:INSPECTOR, WP:DEMOLISH, WP:DONOTDEMOLISHLow
Don't hope the house will build itselfA little planning and a little effort is all that is needed to prevent an article from being deleted.WP:BUILDERLow
Make stubsWhy make a red link, when you can make a stub?WP:MAKESTUBSLow
One sentence does not an article makeOne sentence "articles" and "essays" should be deleted as not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.WP:1S, WP:2S, WP:1 SENTENCE, WP:2 SENTENCESLow
Put a little effort into itWhen creating a new article, even if it is a stub, try to put in at least a little bit more than just the absolute minimum.WP:PUTEFFORT, WP:LITTLEEFFORTLow

Use of templates

EssayIn a nutshellShortcutsImpact
A navbox on every pageNavbox templates can be useful as a tool for navigation.WP:NBFILL, WP:ANOEPLow
Alternatives to the "Expand" templateAvoid using {{expand}} templates. There are alternatives.WP:ALTEXPAND, WP:EXPANDALTSUnranked
Avoid template creepDon't overuse templates. Keep it simple, stupid!WP:ATC, WP:TCREEPLow
Clarify the cleanupUse a specific cleanup template other than {{cleanup}}.WP:CTC, WP:CCLEANUPLow
Navigation templateA navigation template is a template that links between multiple articles belonging to the same topic. There are two types of navigation templates, navigation boxes, or navboxes, and sidebars.WP:NAVHigh
Not everything needs a navboxNavbox templates can be useful as a tool for navigation, but use them sparingly.WP:NENANLow
Responsible taggingIf you identify problems in an article but don't have the knowledge or time to fix them yourself, please take care to only add the most relevant and specific tags, and leave an explanation on the talk page so that others can understand what the problem was and determine if they can do anything to fix it.WP:RESPTAGMid
Tag bombingAdding multiple tags without explaining the reason is disruptive.WP:TAGBOMBLow
Tagging pages for problemsIt is important to clearly and concisely identify problems with Wikipedia pages to allow other editors to fix them.WP:TAGGINGLow
Templates are lazyWe have templates. They're great. Don't use them when you don't need to.WP:LAZYLow
Too many boxesBe Free. Think outside the Box.WP:NOBOX, WP:UNBOXUnranked