Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus -FASTILY 00:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dear Friends - Final Fantasy VIII.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Teggles (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Currently used in Final Fantasy concerts and Music of the Final Fantasy series, both broader topics. Displays an orchestra band performing in a specific concert and one of Final Fantasy characters on video screens. May not be contextually significant to comply with WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - most of these FfDs are for secondary album cover arts that have snuck in to articles covering multiple albums over the years; I disagree with the policy there but it is the consensus and I'm not going to try to overturn it. In this case, however, it's being used to demonstrate the way the concert has an orchestra with lighting and a video screen corresponding to the music, and is the only non-free image in either article. It's a perfectly fine instance of fair use. --PresN 15:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per PresN's rationale. Haleth (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Easily fails WP:NFCC#8. Lacks contextual significance and can easily be described by text alone even with sourced critical commentary as outlined by WP:NFC#CS and WP:FREER. ✗plicit 14:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JBchrch talk 02:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's showing what a "Final Fantasy concert" actually looks like, especially in terms of the placement and positioning of the screens. Like how there's 9 screens, with bigger ones and smaller ones, etc etc. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 15:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I believe it is informative in a way that cannot be shown by text alone, thus falling under fair use. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 March 28. ✗plicit 00:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minecraft city hall.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Topicscape illustrating 2D format.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Argey (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Could qualify for fair use if used in 3D Topicscape. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. While it could be used in 3D Topicscape, I think it would make more sense to use one of the 3D (hence the application's name) examples available on its homepage. This 2D example could arguably be replaced by a self-made free alternative. ✗plicit 00:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:TSC.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TeijeT~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No indication that uploader is the copyright holder of the website shown. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tovutiafrica.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kewaga (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No indication that uploader is the copyright holder of the website shown. Even assuming {{PD-simple}} applies, the image is of low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tattoo in body.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by talk:Archivaldo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Very obviously just a jpeg of the Chinese character 系 superimposed onto a woman's body; the character is a crunchy rescaled image and clearly an entitely different quality to the rest of the photo. It's a low-quality image that doesn't accurately display genital tattooing, and therefore doesn't add anything to Wikipedia. Looking at the uploader's Talk page, this isn't nearly the first image they've uploaded that's been listed for deletion. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 21:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies; I appear to have fucked up the User tag here, as they're listed on Wikimedia Commons, but not on Wikipedia. The user notification template also didn't work on their Wikimedia Commons Talk page; the instructions for manual notification didn't make this clear, so I've had to notify them with a manually-written message.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 21:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.