Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Albacore

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship. Please do not modify it.

Successful -Barras (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Albacore (talk · contribs · count)

RfA of Albacore
global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted
This RfA is currently semi-protected. If you are unable to edit it, direct your comments to the talk page.
Last comment by: ShakespeareFan00.

End date: 17:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, everybody. I have come here to nominate Albacore (talk · contribs) for adminship. Albacore has amassed over 3000 edits since he became active here in last August, and has written and improved several articles. Apart from writing content, he has also tagged over 150 pages for deletion and is active in anti-vandalism work. He is active in Did you know, Simple Talk and Requests for deletions. If he becomes an admin, I believe it would be a net positive for the wiki. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: Accept. Albacore (talk · changes) 17:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Support as nominator. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
2. Sure. Content creation looks great. QD's look good. Most of his reports to VIP look good. I can't find any real issues. Should be a good admin. Good luck! --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk
3. Yup. Goblin 23:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Yottie![reply]
4. A civil, sensible user who helps out in many areas of Simple, so...I don't see why not. :) I hope you succeed, trust you to do well, and wish you all the best, Albacore. Warmly, —Clementina talk 08:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
5. With sufficient edits, I believe he is good to go for the flag (although one-third was concentrated on the first month of his career in Wikipedia). Good luck Albacore! Hydriz^Talk_Bot 08:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
6. Sufficient active, has done gnomish things and also article work. QDs look good as well as the VIP reports. No issues here. Good luck! -Barras (talk) 09:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
7. A great editor who will only benefit the wiki with the mop. Grunny (talk) 10:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
8. A careful editor who is a positive contributor to Simple in all ways. Gotanda (talk) 11:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
9. Per Clementina. wiooiw (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
10. Support. Kansan (talk) 00:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
11. Support. Frozen Windwant to be chilly? 00:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
12. Why not? /fC 04:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
13. --vector ^_^ (talk) 08:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
14. Support Seems like a kind, sensible, and generally active-enough editor. I trust him to use the tools wisely and well. ♥ingly, Bella ^{tête-à-tête} 12:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
15. fr33kman 04:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
16. Support. Good track record, level of trust, and experience. Tools will help in VIP work. Will make a good sysop. Mìthrandir 18:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
17. Yep ----Addihockey10 ^e-mail 18:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
18. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
19. The last I saw of him he was a hard worker. Support. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.