IEEE 802.11g-2003

GenerationIEEE
standard
AdoptedMaximum
link rate
(Mbit/s)
Radio
frequency
(GHz)
Wi-Fi 8802.11bn2028100,000[1]2.4, 5, 6, 7,
42.5, 71[2]
Wi-Fi 7802.11be20241376–46,1202.4, 5, 6[3]
Wi-Fi 6E802.11ax2020574–9608[4]6[a]
Wi-Fi 620192.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5802.11ac2014433–69335[b]
Wi-Fi 4802.11n200872–6002.4, 5
(Wi-Fi 3)*802.11g20036–542.4
(Wi-Fi 2)*802.11a19995
(Wi-Fi 1)*802.11b19991–112.4
(Wi-Fi 0)*802.1119971–22.4
*Wi‑Fi 0, 1, 2, and 3 are named by retroactive inference.
They do not exist in the official nomenclature.[5][6][7]

IEEE 802.11g-2003 or 802.11g is an amendment to the IEEE 802.11 specification that operates in the 2.4 GHz microwave band. The standard has extended link rate to up to 54 Mbit/s using the same 20 MHz bandwidth as 802.11b uses to achieve 11 Mbit/s. This specification, under the marketing name of Wi‑Fi, has been implemented all over the world. The 802.11g protocol is now Clause 19 of the published IEEE 802.11-2007 standard, and Clause 19 of the published IEEE 802.11-2012 standard.

802.11 is a set of IEEE standards that govern wireless networking transmission methods. They are commonly used today in their 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11ac and 802.11ax versions to provide wireless connectivity in the home, office and some commercial establishments.

802.11g is fully backward compatible with 802.11b, but coexistence of the two methods creates a significant performance penalty.

Descriptions

802.11g is the third modulation standard for wireless LANs. It works in the 2.4 GHz band (like 802.11b) but operates at a maximum raw data rate of 54 Mbit/s. Using the CSMA/CA transmission scheme, 31.4 Mbit/s[8] is the maximum net throughput possible for packets of 1500 bytes in size and a 54 Mbit/s wireless rate (identical to 802.11a core, except for some additional legacy overhead for backward compatibility). In practice, access points may not have an ideal implementation and may therefore not be able to achieve even 31.4 Mbit/s throughput with 1500 byte packets. 1500 bytes is the usual limit for packets on the Internet and therefore a relevant size to benchmark against. Smaller packets give even lower theoretical throughput, down to 3 Mbit/s using 54 Mbit/s rate and 64 byte packets.[8] Also, the available throughput is shared between all stations transmitting, including the AP so both downstream and upstream traffic is limited to a shared total of 31.4 Mbit/s using 1500 byte packets and 54 Mbit/s rate.

802.11g hardware is fully backward compatible with 802.11b hardware. Details of making b and g work well together occupied much of the lingering technical process. In an 802.11g network, however, the presence of a legacy 802.11b participant will significantly reduce the speed of the overall 802.11g network, as airtime needs to be managed by RTS/CTS transmissions and a "back off" mechanism.[9] Some 802.11g routers employ a back-compatible mode for 802.11b clients called 54g LRS (Limited Rate Support).[10]

The modulation scheme used in 802.11g is orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) copied from 802.11a with data rates of 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 54 Mbit/s, and reverts to CCK (like the 802.11b standard) for 5.5 and 11 Mbit/s and DBPSK/DQPSK+DSSS for 1 and 2 Mbit/s. Even though 802.11g operates in the same frequency band as 802.11b, it can achieve higher data rates because of its better modulation from 802.11a.

Technical description

Of the 52 OFDM subcarriers, 48 are for data and 4 are pilot subcarriers with a carrier separation of 0.3125 MHz (20 MHz/64). Each of these subcarriers can be a BPSK, QPSK, 16-QAM or 64-QAM. The total bandwidth is 22 MHz with an occupied bandwidth of 16.6 MHz. Symbol duration is 4 microseconds, which includes a guard interval of 0.8 microseconds. The actual generation and decoding of orthogonal components is done in baseband using DSP which is then upconverted to 2.4 GHz at the transmitter. Each of the subcarriers could be represented as a complex number. The time domain signal is generated by taking an Inverse Fast Fourier transform (IFFT). Correspondingly the receiver downconverts, samples at 20 MHz and does an FFT to retrieve the original coefficients. The advantages of using OFDM include reduced multipath effects in reception and increased spectral efficiency.[11]

MCS index(read as little endian)RATE bits R1-R4Modulation
type
Coding
rate
Data rate
(Mbit/s)
111101BPSK1/26
151111BPSK3/49
100101QPSK1/212
140111QPSK3/418
9100116-QAM1/224
13101116-QAM3/436
8000164-QAM2/348
12001164-QAM3/454

Adoption

The then-proposed 802.11g standard was rapidly adopted by consumers starting in January 2003, well before ratification, due to the desire for higher speeds and reductions in manufacturing costs. By mid-2003, most dual-band 802.11a/b products became dual-band/tri-mode, supporting a and b/g in a single mobile adapter card or access point. [citation needed]

Despite its major acceptance, 802.11g suffers from the same interference as 802.11b in the already crowded 2.4 GHz range. Devices operating in this range include microwave ovens, Bluetooth devices, baby monitors, and digital cordless telephones, which can lead to interference issues. Additionally, the success of the standard has caused usage/density problems related to crowding in urban areas. To prevent interference, there are only three non-overlapping usable channels in the U.S. and other countries with similar regulations (channels 1, 6, 11, with 25 MHz separation), and four in Europe (channels 1, 5, 9, 13, with only 20 MHz separation). Even with such separation, some interference due to side lobes exists, though it is considerably weaker.

Channels and frequencies

Graphical representation of Wireless LAN channels in 2.4 GHz band. Channels 12 and 13 are customarily unused in the United States. As a result, the usual 20 MHz allocation becomes 1/6/11, the same as 11b.
IEEE 802.11g channel to frequency map [12]
ChannelCenter frequency
(GHz)
Span
(GHz)
Overlapping channels
12.4122.401–2.4232, 3, 4, 5*
22.4172.406–2.4281, 3, 4, 5, 6*
32.4222.411–2.4331, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7*
42.4272.416–2.4381, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8*
52.4322.421–2.4431*, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9*
62.4372.426–2.4482*, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10*
72.4422.431–2.4533*, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11*
82.4472.436–2.4584*, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12*
92.4522.441–2.4635*, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13*
102.4572.446–2.4686*, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13*
112.4622.451–2.4737*, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13*
122.4672.456–2.4788*, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14*
132.4722.461–2.4839*, 10, 11, 12, 14*
142.4842.473–2.49512, 13

Notes:

  • Not all channels are legal to use in all countries. In particular, no countries in the world permit the use of channel 14 for 802.11g. Channels 12 and 13 are avoided in the United States due to a misinterpretation of regulations.
  • Overlaps noted with an asterisk (*) indicate overlap only in the 22 MHz width, while 802.11g only requires 20 MHz (the actual occupied bandwidth is even lower, 16.25 MHz). As a result, such overlaps have minimal performance implications.

Comparison

Click on "show".

Frequency
range,
or type
PHYProtocolRelease
date [13]
FrequencyBandwidthStream
data rate [14]
Allowable
MIMO streams
ModulationApproximate
range
IndoorOutdoor
(GHz)(MHz)(Mbit/s)
1–7 GHzDSSS[15], FHSS[A]802.11-1997June 19972.4221, 2DSSS, FHSS[A]20 m (66 ft)100 m (330 ft)
HR/DSSS [15]802.11bSeptember 19992.4221, 2, 5.5, 11CCK, DSSS35 m (115 ft)140 m (460 ft)
OFDM802.11aSeptember 199955, 10, 206, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54
(for 20 MHz bandwidth,
divide by 2 and 4 for 10 and 5 MHz)
OFDM35 m (115 ft)120 m (390 ft)
802.11jNovember 20044.9, 5.0
[B][16]
??
802.11yNovember 20083.7 [C]?5,000 m (16,000 ft)[C]
802.11pJuly 20105.9200 m1,000 m (3,300 ft)[17]
802.11bdDecember 20225.9, 60500 m1,000 m (3,300 ft)
ERP-OFDM[18]802.11gJune 20032.438 m (125 ft)140 m (460 ft)
HT-OFDM [19]802.11n
(Wi-Fi 4)
October 20092.4, 520Up to 288.8[D]4MIMO-OFDM
(64-QAM)
70 m (230 ft)250 m (820 ft)[20]
40Up to 600[D]
VHT-OFDM [19]802.11ac
(Wi-Fi 5)
December 2013520Up to 693[D]8DL
MU-MIMO OFDM
(256-QAM)
35 m (115 ft)[21]?
40Up to 1600[D]
80Up to 3467[D]
160Up to 6933[D]
HE-OFDMA802.11ax
(Wi-Fi 6,
Wi-Fi 6E)
May 20212.4, 5, 620Up to 1147[E]8UL/DL
MU-MIMO OFDMA
(1024-QAM)
30 m (98 ft)120 m (390 ft) [F]
40Up to 2294[E]
80Up to 4804[E]
80+80Up to 9608[E]
EHT-OFDMA802.11be
(Wi-Fi 7)
Dec 2024
(est.)
2.4, 5, 680Up to 11.5 Gbit/s[E]16UL/DL
MU-MIMO OFDMA
(4096-QAM)
30 m (98 ft)120 m (390 ft) [F]
160
(80+80)
Up to 23 Gbit/s[E]
240
(160+80)
Up to 35 Gbit/s[E]
320
(160+160)
Up to 46.1 Gbit/s[E]
UHR802.11bn
(Wi-Fi 8)
May 2028
(est.)
2.4, 5, 6,
42, 60, 71
320Up to
100000
(100 Gbit/s)
16Multi-link
MU-MIMO OFDM
(8192-QAM)
??
WUR [G]802.11baOctober 20212.4, 54, 200.0625, 0.25
(62.5 kbit/s, 250 kbit/s)
OOK (multi-carrier OOK)??
mmWave
(WiGig)
DMG [22]802.11adDecember 2012602160
(2.16 GHz)
Up to 8085[23]
(8 Gbit/s)
OFDM[A], single carrier, low-power single carrier[A]3.3 m (11 ft)[24]?
802.11ajApril 201860 [H]1080[25]Up to 3754
(3.75 Gbit/s)
single carrier, low-power single carrier[A]??
CMMG802.11ajApril 201845 [H]540,
1080
Up to 15015[26]
(15 Gbit/s)
4 [27]OFDM, single carrier??
EDMG [28]802.11ayJuly 202160Up to 8640
(8.64 GHz)
Up to 303336[29]
(303 Gbit/s)
8OFDM, single carrier10 m (33 ft)100 m (328 ft)
Sub 1 GHz (IoT)TVHT [30]802.11afFebruary 20140.054–
0.79
6, 7, 8Up to 568.9[31]4MIMO-OFDM??
S1G [30]802.11ahMay 20170.7, 0.8,
0.9
1–16Up to 8.67[32]
(@2 MHz)
4??
Light
(Li-Fi)
LC
(VLC/OWC)
802.11bbDecember 2023
(est.)
800–1000 nm20Up to 9.6 Gbit/sO-OFDM??
IR[A]
(IrDA)
802.11-1997June 1997850–900 nm?1, 2PPM[A]??
802.11 Standard rollups
 802.11-2007 (802.11ma)March 20072.4, 5Up to 54DSSS, OFDM
802.11-2012 (802.11mb)March 20122.4, 5Up to 150[D]DSSS, OFDM
802.11-2016 (802.11mc)December 20162.4, 5, 60Up to 866.7 or 6757[D]DSSS, OFDM
802.11-2020 (802.11md)December 20202.4, 5, 60Up to 866.7 or 6757[D]DSSS, OFDM
802.11meSeptember 2024
(est.)
2.4, 5, 6, 60Up to 9608 or 303336DSSS, OFDM

See also

Notes

References

  • "IEEE 802.11g-2003: Further Higher Data Rate Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band" (PDF). IEEE. 2003-10-20. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2004. Retrieved 2007-09-24.