Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Runningblader

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Runningblader

Withdrawn January 27th

Vote for me :) Runningblader 22:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance:

Support

Oppose

• Weak Oppose I would suggest reading Wikipedia:Criteria for adminship before trying to request an adminship. I would also recommend learning the rules and policies of this Wiki. Razorflame 22:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose you have only been here for about two days, which doesn't show that you are knowledgeable of policy and need the tools, and the nomination. Please read Wikipedia:Criteria for adminship Oysterguitarist 22:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Oppose and suggest closure, as above Whitstable 22:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Instead of strongly opposing and suggesting closure, why don't you provide some helpful advice for this user and close it yourself? It's incredibly off putting for any user to have a load of opposes thrown in his or her face. Majorly (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for your input. Whitstable 23:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I've already told him good things on his talk page. I am awaiting his reply. Razorflame 23:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Period. --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 23:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.